Wouldn't be surprised if it hits 10+%What’s the prediction for tax hike percentage if Chow gets in?
Wouldn't be surprised if it hits 10+%What’s the prediction for tax hike percentage if Chow gets in?
Yeah. I could see that.Wouldn't be surprised if it hits 10+%
Mark Saunders is tweeting it'll be 25% at least.Yeah. I could see that.
I could also see her office get stoned and torched if it happened.
Mark Saunders, is that the guy that assured us that there was no serial killer hunting queer men in the village? That Mark Saunders? Definitely trustworthy /sMark Saunders is tweeting it'll be 25% at least.
He sounds trustworthy
I'm sorry, but the actual annual property tax plus the Building Fund Levy increased by an average of 2.23%/year over the total of Tory's 9 budgets.Property tax increases under John Tory
2015 2.75%
2016 1.30%
2017 2.50%
2018 2.10%
2019 3.58%
2020 4.24%
2021 0.70%
2022 4.40%
2023 7.00%
AVG 3.17%
You can't argue that Tory's increases were too low and that's why we have underfunded city services. There are underfunded city services because left wing kooky policies have driven businesses out of the city.
It must be hard going through life being this stupid.Maybe from your perspective since you are extreme left. But in reality his policies have been centre to centre left. Largely because he has to placate the lefties on council. Here's the council makeup of Tory's first term in office
![]()
Toronto City Council 2014–2018 - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Out of the 44 councilors and 1 mayor on Kirk's Wiki link list, I count:It must be hard going through life being this stupid.
Tory didn't placate to the left leaning councillors on council. He basically stacked all the important positions on council, like committees, with right leaning ass kissers so that left leaning councillors barely had a voice at all.
There's nothing "left" about cutting services year over year by under funding them through keeping property taxes at or below inflation.
The only centrist thing about Tory is that he would try and come across as being socially progressive. Talk is cheap however. You can talk about how great equity and inclusion is but if you go on to starve the programs that help marginalized communities live a better lives, all that talk means nothing.
So, just who is going to pay for:Nothing wrong with keeping taxes low. People are already paying through the roof for houses and mortgages what with all the interest rate hikes and you want to jack up property taxes too? In the wake of a possible (some would argue ongoing) recession when jobs are tenuous? What you want people to end up on the streets? This is why left wing nonsense never makes anyone's life better. It is all about "feel good" initiatives and the only people paying for it are the citizens in the form of increased taxation.
That's what's given us homeless living in parks, TTC falling apart, roads in poor repair and services declining.The 1st two were funded by the federal government, were they not?
So cut spending and non essential feel good initiatives out of the budget. Everytime you need money you will just take money off of the people who are already facing financial pressures, which leads to more spending?
What you are proposing does not make financial sense. It is just a slippery slope.
JFC, tell me you failed Econ 101 without telling me you failed Econ 101...What you are proposing is: Increased spending, therefore increased taxation, which results in less money to go around, which results in inflation...
This is the exact definition of penny wise and pound foolish. We either spend now or kick the can down the road and spend more later, which is exactly what has been going on for the last 12+ years of Conservative rule in Toronto.We need to cut spending on things we don't need to be spending, reduce taxes, put more in the hands of the people, which will reduce inflation and interest rates, and therefore defaults and therefore homelessness.
It is no different than how you would cut out expenses if you needed to save more.
What we need to do is stand up to the thug and make the province pay for all Metrolinx adventures, their fair share of transit and health care.What you are proposing is: Increased spending, therefore increased taxation, which results in less money to go around, which results in inflation and interest rates hikes, which puts more pressure on people with increased mortgages and other expenses, which results in defaults, which results in more homelessness, which results in more spending, which results in more taxation.....and round and round we go.
We need to cut spending on things we don't need to be spending, reduce taxes, put more in the hands of the people, which will reduce inflation and interest rates, and therefore defaults and therefore homelessness.
It is no different than how you would cut out expenses if you needed to save more.
Poor John, he looks 10 years older in less than a year. The ordeal has taken its toll.
"The 1st two were funded by the federal government were they not?"The 1st two were funded by the federal government, were they not?
So cut spending and non essential feel good initiatives out of the budget. Everytime you need money you will just take money off of the people who are already facing financial pressures, which leads to more spending?
What you are proposing does not make financial sense. It is just a slippery slope.
Surely, there must have been benefits that also accrued to the good citizens of Toronto (e.g. jobs, sale of goods and services, etc.)Wealth, I might add that was accrued by them because they were the beneficiaries of the wealth created by being based in Toronto.
There.Toronto did receive some funding from the province etc, But regardless of that with what you are proposing there will always be shortfalls as no amount of taxes will help bridge the gap with increasing spending. It's like trying to lose weight while eating cheeseburgers every day. Toronto has a spending problem. The only way is to cut spending. If not, Toronto will be unaffordable for a majority of its residents and the situation will get worse in the coming years.
Nothing could be further from the truth.They will ALL raise taxes if they win. It's only a couple that are honest about it and admit they will.
Canadians can talk until they are blue in the face about budget cuts and balanced budgets, but when it comes time to cut programs they raise a fuss. Canadians like their social programs.
In some of my numbers I did include the building fund levy so I have revisedI'm sorry, but the actual annual property tax plus the Building Fund Levy increased by an average of 2.23%/year over the total of Tory's 9 budgets.
Now, when removing the Building Fund Levy of 1.5%, because it is not a property tax supported levy that is directed to the city's operational budget for city services, but directed solely to it's capital budget, then the actual average property tax increases to support operational city services drops to 1.5%.
So yes, hell yes Tory certainly did underfund the City of Toronto's operational budget which is directed towards city services over his miserly 2 and 1/8th terms.
Especially appalling as the city's population grew substantially over that time and Tory's operational budgets did not meet the needs of an ever-expanding city, did not account for inflationary growth and did not meet the basics for the quality of life of it's citizens, all of which continued the decay and decomposition of the city started by Mel Lastman, hyper-driven by Rob Ford, for nine effin years and driven to the fiscal and financial abyss by Tory.





