Royal Spa
Toronto Escorts

The election litigation thread

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,820
2,280
113
Yes, it's stupid but true.
Rudy and his crack team of investigators had to withdraw all the affidavits in their suit in Pennsylvania.
The only one still referring to them is you.

SS
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,462
5,653
113
This is the NHL version of the Elections. ENJOY!!

If Sports Start Playing Out Like The 2020 Election:

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,614
17,841
113

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
46,945
8,119
113
Toronto
Trump fears Giuliani, other lawyers in Biden vote challenge are ‘fools that are making him look bad’

Gee, I wonder who put them in an impossible situation. And then he blames them. Nothing is ever his fault.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
70,636
69,606
113
Maybe dutchie could become trumps lawyer
It's too late. The Orange Doof caved in and authorized the transition. Like a huge, foul-smelling, orange carp hooked and wriggling on the deck of the fishing boat, he slapped his obese, bloated tail one last time, horked up a gob of Stormy's pubic hair that had lodged behind one of his rotting molars for almost a decade and finally..... thankfully.... mercifully died.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,614
17,841
113
Trump fears Giuliani, other lawyers in Biden vote challenge are ‘fools that are making him look bad’

Gee, I wonder who put them in an impossible situation. And then he blames them. Nothing is ever his fault.
Couldn't be him, he only hires the best people.
It must be Hillary's fault.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
46,945
8,119
113
Toronto
I'm surprised that he doesn't get the crap beat out of him.
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,820
2,280
113
Here's an election thought experiment. I say this up front so Frank can just skip over this post.

Imagine an election process as follows. There are two candidates running. You go into a booth and mark your ballot. You then take your ballot to an election official who tosses a coin - heads, your vote is recorded as marked, tails - it is flipped to the other candidate. Note that this process involves no fraud, and is not weighted to favour either candidate.

Question - as a voter, are you satisfied with this process? Do you consider it to be reliable way of executing a democratic election?

Question - as a candidate, are you satisfied? The law of probability dictates that if this process is carried out enough times, eventually half of the coin flips will be heads and half tails, thereby nullifying the effect of the process on the result of the election. How small, in percentage, would the margin of victory have to be for you to lose confidence that the effect of the coin flip was nullified? 1%? .5% Smaller?
 

Fun For All

Well-known member
Feb 9, 2014
11,214
5,488
113
Here's an election thought experiment. I say this up front so Frank can just skip over this post.

Imagine an election process as follows. There are two candidates running. You go into a booth and mark your ballot. You then take your ballot to an election official who tosses a coin - heads, your vote is recorded as marked, tails - it is flipped to the other candidate. Note that this process involves no fraud, and is not weighted to favour either candidate.

Question - as a voter, are you satisfied with this process? Do you consider it to be reliable way of executing a democratic election?

Question - as a candidate, are you satisfied? The law of probability dictates that if this process is carried out enough times, eventually half of the coin flips will be heads and half tails, thereby nullifying the effect of the process on the result of the election. How small, in percentage, would the margin of victory have to be for you to lose confidence that the effect of the coin flip was nullified? 1%? .5% Smaller?
^^^That was just silly...
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,614
17,841
113
Here's an election thought experiment. I say this up front so Frank can just skip over this post.

Imagine an election process as follows. There are two candidates running. You go into a booth and mark your ballot. You then take your ballot to an election official who tosses a coin - heads, your vote is recorded as marked, tails - it is flipped to the other candidate. Note that this process involves no fraud, and is not weighted to favour either candidate.

Question - as a voter, are you satisfied with this process? Do you consider it to be reliable way of executing a democratic election?

Question - as a candidate, are you satisfied? The law of probability dictates that if this process is carried out enough times, eventually half of the coin flips will be heads and half tails, thereby nullifying the effect of the process on the result of the election. How small, in percentage, would the margin of victory have to be for you to lose confidence that the effect of the coin flip was nullified? 1%? .5% Smaller?
S
 
  • Like
Reactions: drc75

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,820
2,280
113
^^^That was just silly...
If that's as much thought as you are prepared to give it, that explains why you are misinterpreting some of the issues being raised in these election suits. Of course, it doesn't help that some of the decisions being rendered similarly misrepresent these same issues relating to election reliability (not the same as fraud).
 
Toronto Escorts