Here's an election thought experiment. I say this up front so Frank can just skip over this post.
Imagine an election process as follows. There are two candidates running. You go into a booth and mark your ballot. You then take your ballot to an election official who tosses a coin - heads, your vote is recorded as marked, tails - it is flipped to the other candidate. Note that this process involves no fraud, and is not weighted to favour either candidate.
Question - as a voter, are you satisfied with this process? Do you consider it to be reliable way of executing a democratic election?
Question - as a candidate, are you satisfied? The law of probability dictates that if this process is carried out enough times, eventually half of the coin flips will be heads and half tails, thereby nullifying the effect of the process on the result of the election. How small, in percentage, would the margin of victory have to be for you to lose confidence that the effect of the coin flip was nullified? 1%? .5% Smaller?