I'd feel a little more comfortable securing the canadian border. The cartel have said they'll fight the soldiers at the Mexican border.
Try to keep up with the flow of the conversation. I wasn't bragging. It's not like I originated a thread talking about my education.Translation, blah blah blah blah. Posting you have a dr in front of your name, we're so proud. Lol
the tariffs may /may not workThe real play here is he wants jobs back from Mexico and Canada, but it's almost impossible to do this.
Canada (we shall put it first) | USA | |
Total tax burden on workforce (income tax, sales tax, property tax) | 46.1% | 24.7% |
% of workforce in Govt | 20.1% | 13.3% |
GDP per capita (USD) | 53 K | 81 K |
Effective Corporate tax rate | 15% | 21% |
payroll taxes | similar | similar |
Public debt per capita Federal & Provincial | 60K (Ontario) | 104 K |
I never called you woke, that was another one of your fans. You're confused again. You get confused easily. Once again I suspect dementia. And again you failed to provide any example of my spelling mistakes but instead made a spelling mistake of your own. I would expect higher intelligence from a doctor but then again you're as much of a doctor as Dr. Dre.First, I'm poorly educated. If I'm educated, then I must have taken social sciences. If I have a doctorate then I must be woke. If I'm not woke I must have bought my degree.
Once again this quote below shows how typical you are of a trump cultist with trump Devotee Syndrome, tDS. Please admit what you've become since trump captured your imagination and your heart.
The logic of a Trump supporter: "He didn't say that. And if he did, he didn't mean that. And if he did, you didn't understand it. And if you did, it's not a big deal. And if it is, others have said worse!"
View attachment 403513
He's as much of a doctor as Dr. DreTranslation, blah blah blah blah. Posting you have a dr in front of your name, we're so proud. Lol
I did not divert in the slightest. I listed what I believe are common traits of tDSers. You said that none of them applied to you and asked me to show an example, which I clearly did and you could not meet my challenge. I said that you believe everything that trump says, yet you cited zero examples of where you did not believe trump. There was a clear uninterrupted flow to the discussion with no diversion on my part. Now, since you failed, it is you diverting and wanting me to prove something else.So you have zero examples to share and decided to divert the conversation in an entirely different direction......wait a minute....this is Justin isn't it? I'm going to insist you provide some examples of my spelling mistakes. Put up or shut up as the kids say.....
I wasn't talking about rights....every people no matter what they believe in have rights....all I'm asking you is, do you believe there are only 2 genders....transgender belongs to the gender they were born with...yes or no?I know you didn't, but I believe that you included a post that he sent to me originally claiming I was poorly educated.
More than 2? Not at all. But I believe that transgender people deserve more rights than right-wingers are willing to give them. BTW, the right to compete against female athletes in sports, is not a right that I agree with. I very strongly disagree.
Ok just to appease your pathetic little self, I don't believe Trump when he said he didn't get peed on by Russian hookers. Feel better? Now provide any example(you can't) of my spelling mistakes? Do that and you'll be my 'favourite' leftie loserI did not divert in the slightest. I listed what I believe are common traits of tDSers. You said that none of them applied to you and asked me to show an example, which I clearly did and you could not meet my challenge. I said that you believe everything that trump says, yet you cited zero examples of where you did not believe trump. There was a clear uninterrupted flow to the discussion with no diversion on my part. Now, since you failed, it is you diverting and wanting me to prove something else.
I did put up and you had no examples of where you don't believe trump. You believe everything that he says. Since I put up the first time and you flunked there is no need to put up for you again unless you admit that you do believe everything that trump says. Are you willing to do that? Better yet, you should just admit that the whole list is correct.
Another suggestion is stop trying to outdebate me. You're not doing yourself any favours. Remember, trump said that he loves the poorly educated.
0.000000000000000000000000000000000001 mg per week (I assume I inhale it in the atmosphere to some extent)Yes it is for many. We can make a better assessment if you tell us your current daily dosage.
What ever you say Doc Btw how much do those fake diplomas go for? Thinking about sprucing up my office....Keep moving the goalposts as much as you like. Now it's not that I bought a degree, it's that I don't have one at all. The girls are cuter than you.
View attachment 403520
I don't get pendanic spelling Nazi. Why does it bother you so much? Do you beat your kids if they spell something incorrectly?Haha your inability to read between the lines is adorable. Also, you spelled 'favorite' wrong dummy.
What kids?I don't get pendanic spelling Nazi. Why does it bother you so much? Do you beat your kids if they spell something incorrectly?
There was a whole lot more going on in Germany. To make your point, it's important to ignore all these preceding events.he did fuck up with this blackmail it seems. Nevertheless…
For a dictator to implement Nazi-like policies—meaning extreme authoritarianism, militarization, suppression of dissent, and potentially genocidal policies—a combination of factors is required, not just raw percentage support. However, historical examples suggest a rough threshold of support needed among key societal groups.
Key Considerations:
1. Elite Support (Military, Police, Bureaucracy, Business, Media)
• A dictator needs the backing of the security forces and administrative machinery. Even with only 30-40% popular support, control over these institutions can allow for oppressive policies.
2. Active Loyalist Base
• In Nazi Germany, the Nazi Party never had a majority in free elections. Hitler came to power with about 33% of the vote in 1932 but later consolidated control by outlawing opposition and using force.
• A dedicated 25-35% of the population providing active ideological and logistical support (militias, informants, enforcers) can make up for lack of majority consent.
3. Passive Acquiescence
• Many citizens don’t need to actively support dictatorship; they just need to tolerate or rationalize it. Fear, propaganda, or economic stability can ensure that even if only 20-30% strongly support the regime, another 40-50% may remain passive, unwilling to resist.
4. Suppression of Opposition
• If opposition is crushed early—through censorship, arrests, and fear tactics—the need for majority support diminishes. If 10-20% of the population is willing to openly resist, but the regime neutralizes them quickly, dictatorship can sustain itself even with minority backing.
Estimated Thresholds for a Nazi-Like Regime
• Hardcore Supporters (Ideologically Committed): ~25-35%
• Passive Acquiescence (Going Along to Avoid Trouble): ~40-50%
• Active Resistance (Willing to Risk Lives to Oppose): <20%
Thus, a dictator could enforce Nazi-like policies with as little as 25-35% committed support, provided the rest of society is neutralized through fear, propaganda, or apathy. Majority approval is not necessary—control over key institutions and suppression of dissent are far more critical.
Do you self flaggalate when you make a spelling error?(Oh dear I am SURE I did not spell that one right) lolWhat kids?
All of them.
Remember that one of the core traits of trump Devotee Syndrome, tDS, is the inability to recognize reality. You can't see what you are. You can't see that your in a cult.
OK, here's a challenge back regarding that list.
If you don't believe everything he says, show us posts where you told us that you believe he's lied. I predict that you have never, ever, ever, ever, never ever, never never claimed that he lied.
By definition, if you say that you don't believe everything he's said, then you must have examples of him lying. Which times were those.
p.s., I hope I didn't keep you waiting very long. That was about 20 minutes, but you can now see that all of traits belong to you.
Last time you asked if I thought that there were more than 2 sexes and I said clearly said "no". Why are you now asking me again the exact same question but with slightly different wording. Was my 1st response unclear or is there some valid reason that I have to answer again?I wasn't talking about rights....every people no matter what they believe in have rights....all I'm asking you is, do you believe there are only 2 genders....transgender belongs to the gender they were born with...yes or no?
You're assuming that I make spelling mistakes. You know what happens when you assume? You make an 'ass' out of you(u), in front of 'me'.Do you self flaggalate when you make a spelling error?(Oh dear I am SURE I did not spell that one right) lol
There you have it folks, the 'doctor' has spoken.Last time you asked if I thought that there were more than 2 sexes and I said clearly said "no". Why are you now asking me again the exact same question but with slightly different wording. Was my 1st response unclear or is there some valid reason that I have to answer again?
I talked about rights because I felt your question was a test of whether I was woke or not. I've said that I'm not and gave my reasoning to reaffirm my position. Was there something improper? Did I break some rules?
What point are you trying to make?
I was stating no opinion on either trump or Trudeau. There was no attempt at comparison either.the very same argument could be made of Trudeau
both are narcissists, both have scandals , both are vindictive and both can be nasty and both lie
Canadians have no say wrt Trump being elected and need to face the reality he is not going anywhere for 4 years
Canadians may still have a say wrt Trudeau
if you want to go further
ones a builder of economic value, while the other is hell bent on killing our resource sector.