Yes it is for many. We can make a better assessment if you tell us your current daily dosage.Isn't fentanyl a self correcting problem in the long run?
Yes it is for many. We can make a better assessment if you tell us your current daily dosage.Isn't fentanyl a self correcting problem in the long run?
Translation, blah blah blah blah. Posting you have a dr in front of your name, we're so proud. LolI'll concede that he was right when he said that he loves the poorly educated. Forget elite colleges and private schools and discuss government funded schools. Do you think that the US has a better educational system than Canada? All Ontarian kids get basically the same education. Inner city Phiile, Baltimore, Boston, Buffalo, Detroit, Chicago, Patterson NJ and all of the poor southern states and so many more districts are all under-funded. All of the rural kids work the mines and fields and never get a good education. Those kids will almost never have a chance.
These are the people that voted trump in. Even these people know how to put an "X" beside trump's name. It is not a display of intelligence.
Actually, I am. I have a post-graduate degree and Dr. in front of my name.
You post those laugh emojies after so many of my posts as well as the laugh reactions. You haven't figured out how laughable your comments are. You are laughing at yourself. trump loves the poorly educated.
Canada doesn't explicitly prohibit ATT, Verizon and T-Mobile from competing in Canada.The point you were trying to make was that Rogers, Bell and Telus are not allowed to operate in the U.S.
If Deutsche Telecom could come to the U.S. and build one of the U.S.' largest carriers, so could a Canadian telecom.
If you actually believe Canada organically has three local telecom companies in an open investment environment, you are not making the connections.
Try to keep up with the flow of the conversation. I wasn't bragging. It's not like I originated a thread talking about my education.Translation, blah blah blah blah. Posting you have a dr in front of your name, we're so proud. Lol
the tariffs may /may not workThe real play here is he wants jobs back from Mexico and Canada, but it's almost impossible to do this.
Canada (we shall put it first) | USA | |
Total tax burden on workforce (income tax, sales tax, property tax) | 46.1% | 24.7% |
% of workforce in Govt | 20.1% | 13.3% |
GDP per capita (USD) | 53 K | 81 K |
Effective Corporate tax rate | 15% | 21% |
payroll taxes | similar | similar |
Public debt per capita Federal & Provincial | 60K (Ontario) | 104 K |
I did not divert in the slightest. I listed what I believe are common traits of tDSers. You said that none of them applied to you and asked me to show an example, which I clearly did and you could not meet my challenge. I said that you believe everything that trump says, yet you cited zero examples of where you did not believe trump. There was a clear uninterrupted flow to the discussion with no diversion on my part. Now, since you failed, it is you diverting and wanting me to prove something else.So you have zero examples to share and decided to divert the conversation in an entirely different direction......wait a minute....this is Justin isn't it? I'm going to insist you provide some examples of my spelling mistakes. Put up or shut up as the kids say.....
I wasn't talking about rights....every people no matter what they believe in have rights....all I'm asking you is, do you believe there are only 2 genders....transgender belongs to the gender they were born with...yes or no?I know you didn't, but I believe that you included a post that he sent to me originally claiming I was poorly educated.
More than 2? Not at all. But I believe that transgender people deserve more rights than right-wingers are willing to give them. BTW, the right to compete against female athletes in sports, is not a right that I agree with. I very strongly disagree.
0.000000000000000000000000000000000001 mg per week (I assume I inhale it in the atmosphere to some extent)Yes it is for many. We can make a better assessment if you tell us your current daily dosage.
I don't get pendanic spelling Nazi. Why does it bother you so much? Do you beat your kids if they spell something incorrectly?Haha your inability to read between the lines is adorable. Also, you spelled 'favorite' wrong dummy.
There was a whole lot more going on in Germany. To make your point, it's important to ignore all these preceding events.he did fuck up with this blackmail it seems. Nevertheless…
For a dictator to implement Nazi-like policies—meaning extreme authoritarianism, militarization, suppression of dissent, and potentially genocidal policies—a combination of factors is required, not just raw percentage support. However, historical examples suggest a rough threshold of support needed among key societal groups.
Key Considerations:
1. Elite Support (Military, Police, Bureaucracy, Business, Media)
• A dictator needs the backing of the security forces and administrative machinery. Even with only 30-40% popular support, control over these institutions can allow for oppressive policies.
2. Active Loyalist Base
• In Nazi Germany, the Nazi Party never had a majority in free elections. Hitler came to power with about 33% of the vote in 1932 but later consolidated control by outlawing opposition and using force.
• A dedicated 25-35% of the population providing active ideological and logistical support (militias, informants, enforcers) can make up for lack of majority consent.
3. Passive Acquiescence
• Many citizens don’t need to actively support dictatorship; they just need to tolerate or rationalize it. Fear, propaganda, or economic stability can ensure that even if only 20-30% strongly support the regime, another 40-50% may remain passive, unwilling to resist.
4. Suppression of Opposition
• If opposition is crushed early—through censorship, arrests, and fear tactics—the need for majority support diminishes. If 10-20% of the population is willing to openly resist, but the regime neutralizes them quickly, dictatorship can sustain itself even with minority backing.
Estimated Thresholds for a Nazi-Like Regime
• Hardcore Supporters (Ideologically Committed): ~25-35%
• Passive Acquiescence (Going Along to Avoid Trouble): ~40-50%
• Active Resistance (Willing to Risk Lives to Oppose): <20%
Thus, a dictator could enforce Nazi-like policies with as little as 25-35% committed support, provided the rest of society is neutralized through fear, propaganda, or apathy. Majority approval is not necessary—control over key institutions and suppression of dissent are far more critical.
Do you self flaggalate when you make a spelling error?(Oh dear I am SURE I did not spell that one right) lolWhat kids?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
All of them.
Remember that one of the core traits of trump Devotee Syndrome, tDS, is the inability to recognize reality. You can't see what you are. You can't see that your in a cult.
OK, here's a challenge back regarding that list.
If you don't believe everything he says, show us posts where you told us that you believe he's lied. I predict that you have never, ever, ever, ever, never ever, never never claimed that he lied.
By definition, if you say that you don't believe everything he's said, then you must have examples of him lying. Which times were those.
p.s., I hope I didn't keep you waiting very long. That was about 20 minutes, but you can now see that all of traits belong to you.
Last time you asked if I thought that there were more than 2 sexes and I said clearly said "no". Why are you now asking me again the exact same question but with slightly different wording. Was my 1st response unclear or is there some valid reason that I have to answer again?I wasn't talking about rights....every people no matter what they believe in have rights....all I'm asking you is, do you believe there are only 2 genders....transgender belongs to the gender they were born with...yes or no?
I was stating no opinion on either trump or Trudeau. There was no attempt at comparison either.the very same argument could be made of Trudeau
both are narcissists, both have scandals , both are vindictive and both can be nasty and both lie
Canadians have no say wrt Trump being elected and need to face the reality he is not going anywhere for 4 years
Canadians may still have a say wrt Trudeau
if you want to go further
ones a builder of economic value, while the other is hell bent on killing our resource sector.
Shouldn't your name be "dave'snot here". That's what Cheech keeps asking.There you have it folks, the 'doctor' has spoken.![]()
You're just making arguments to dismiss what we all see on the ground. We also don't need you to explain the capital requirements of telecom.Canada doesn't explicitly prohibit ATT, Verizon and T-Mobile from competing in Canada.
Becoming a Telecom provider involves network infrastructure, spectrum licenses and regulatory approvals which are often very cost prohibitive..
That holds good for both the US and Canada.
As for DT, they did not come to the US organically. They acquired T-Mobile's predecessor several years ago.
So again not sure how this helps your case.
It is not like the US allows laissez faire expansion even amongst the big 3 domestically.
For example mergers are subject to FCC review and conditions.
I didn't make an argument that the U.S. has a big foreign competitor organically. I basically said Canada's big three telecoms were not organically established without the help of a closed market.As for DT, they did not come to the US organically. They acquired T-Mobile's predecessor several years ago.
So again not sure how this helps your case.
This is a curious case of whataboutism. The U.S. has direct foreign investment in our telecom sector. Canada does not. Of course, telecom mergers and expansions are regulated in the U.S. like they are everywhere.It is not like the US allows laissez faire expansion even amongst the big 3 domestically. For example mergers are subject to FCC review and conditions.
He's quebecois.You do it quite frequently. Maybe you should invest in spell check