Now you are pivoting from the definition of hate speech, a federal crime in Canada, to the definition of genocide. You make yourself look silly.
Just make sure you maintain your anonymity.
Pro Hamas in the west - and their adventures
- Thread starter mandrill
- Start date
Just make sure you maintain your anonymity.
You can define race by religious beliefs, hammy.
What's your point?
Oh right, your cultural genocide through your refusal to accept that Palestinians are also a race.
That's another example of 318.
Do you think ignorance will work as your defence of pushing genocide, hammy?
My point is that you and I have both now said that Kautilya is dead wrong when he declares that Jews are not a race. The 2 posts of yours I reposted a while ago show that, when you referred to Jews as a race.
And now you reaffirm it once again by directly contradicting him with this post above. He is adamant that Jews are not a race because Judaism is based on religion and you just said the opposite. You just said that religion is a very valid measure by which to define a race.
Thanks for your support.
Please Geno, we were talking about the definition of hate speech and here you are again talking about genocide. You keep showing how my nickname for you is soooo PERFECT. Nobody refers to genocide more than you.
A reminder, hammy.
Promoting genocide is a federal offence that could land you up to 5 years in jail.
The UN has reported Israel is committing genocide and you are willfully promoting this genocide.
318 (1) Every one who advocates or promotes genocide is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.
Definition of genocide
(2) In this section, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy in whole or in part any identifiable group, namely,
(a) killing members of the group; or
(b) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction
What's the UN's policy on hostages?
I know article 3 of the Geneva Convention prohibits taking hostages...but can't find anything from the UN. Can you help? You seem to know the UN policies very well.
A reminder Geno. We were originally talking about hate speech. Why does that not interest you anymore?
You have to go through the hundreds of resolutions that Israel hasn't abided by first, then add in the UN reports saying the occupation is illegal, Israel is apartheid and committing genocide. Then you can get to the UNSC ordered ceasefire that Israel ignored that would have lead to the hostages being released.
You fell on your face there, skoob.
You think promoting genocide isn't also hate speech, hammy?
How about promoting apartheid and the targeting and killing of 25,000 women and children?
So you're justifying hostage taking despite it being against the Geneva convention and think that months later they aren't being released because Israel won't let them?
Are you really that broken you can't see the stupidity in your thinking?
You're bringing up the Geneva Conventions, skoob?
Under the Geneva Conventions Israel does not have a right to self defence against the people they occupy, they have a moral duty for their well being.
The blockade is against the Geneva Conventions, that's a 17 year infraction, a large part of why Hamas is rebelling against the illegal occupation.
Taking hostages is a war crime, as are 'administrative detentions' by Israel and arresting children.
If you back the Geneva Conventions explain why you think Israel is exempt.
I'm not avoiding that discussion at all.
Promoting genocide is hate speech, hammy.
Making false accusations of a group for the sole purpose of fomenting hatred against that group is the very definition of hate speech.
Every accusation is an admission, hammy.
You keep making false accusations against Palestinians in or to justify what the UN has called 'genocide'.
The accusation of genocide is being debated again at the ICJ.
