Actually it didn't.Yes, you can call it whatever you want. Most people are no longer interested in dredging up sexual abuse cases against rich and powerful men from twenty-five years ago. I'm sorry but that's true. That moment in time came and went.
PS- I believe the Carroll civil case also exceeded the original statute of limitations. Do you believe there should be statutes of limitations for legal proceedings? Do you think statute of limitations should be applied discriminatively based on the accused?
People call him a rapist because they are interested in holding people accountable.
The statute of limitations did exceed in the civil case but the ASA made this possible.
My opinion is that there should be no statute of limitations at all for crimes such as rapes, sexual assault, murder etc.,