With all due respect, Marner is a great 2-way player but from your Habs bias, you don't see it. After Bergeron is gone, Marner will be winning Selkes (he's nominated for one this year). But you might be right it may not fit Chicago's timeline, but then again Bedard could end up being a bust and Marner be could hoisting a cup with the Hawks. We know what we are getting with Marner, Bedard isn't a guaranteed NHL superstar.
It's a terrible trade idea that makes no sense for Chicago based on where they are.
I make no comment on Marner.
Instead you say I am bias.
Thankfully you added that 3rd round pick - because that's really going to sway things. Maybe add a 4th as well next time and I will say brilliant trade!
With the value - Marner is a very good player, but Bedard has more upside. That is not really debatable. Sure he can fail to meet it, but the odds are very high that he reaches where Marner at, and the odds are quite good that he takes it another tier.
And are you calling Marner a guaranteed superstar right now or even ever? A superstar is a top 5 player in the league, and no Marner is not that (he is never been higher than 19th in the Hart). He is really good though. Oops, that must be my Montreal bias.
As for the timeline.
Bedard costs $10m less for the next 3 years (that's a lot of additional cap moves for Chicago)
Bedard has contract control for 7 years -- Marner for 2.
Bedard will be about 22 or 23 when Chicago starts to build up a strong supporting core. Marner will be about 30-31. That's pretty significant.
But they that 3rd round pick!