Israel at war
- Thread starter Butler1000
- Start date
Isn't that an interesting admission.
Yes.
It's a tragic misunderstanding of what voting is about given the system they are voting in.
Why do you think its a misunderstanding of the system if they find there is an issue that means they can't support a politician.
Why do you blame the voters instead of the politician, does Harris understand the system she is in?
Palestine isn't a recognized state. How can someone be deported from something that doesn't exist?
How can someone be so wrong, so continually?
Palestine is not a sovereign state. Palestine does not have a vote at the UN.
Only because Israeli is illegally occupying and trying to colonize and settle Palestine.
Israel needs to abide by the ICJ ruling and end the occupation.
And to pay restitution.
How much will the restitution for the Gaza genocide be?
Last edited:
ANOTHER HASBARA ATTACK DOG AT NYT CASTIGATED BY JOHNS HOPKINS PROF
Mainstream Media's Leading Warmonger: NYT Columnist Bret Stephens
The New York Times has always favored Israel in its editorial writings, but no Times’ columnist compares to Bret Stephens, whose writings are chauvinistic and bellicose., Stephens, a former editor of the Jerusalem Post and a supporter of all Israeli policies, left the Wall Street Journal to...
www.counterpunch.org
Which really means, "Shut up and vote for who the Elites tell you to. We know better than the unwashed masses"
Yeah, why have carefully worked out diplomatic policy platforms when you should just immediately let whatever whahoos crash your rally, scream at you and then do whatever they order you to do??
Good point, bro! You always hit the nail!
Aiding a genocide for AIPAC cash is hardly a carefully worked out diplomatic policy when its given you the label 'Genocide Joe', made the US globally hated and lead the middle east very close to starting a major war.
Backing someone who is about to be issued ICC warrants for genocide is not a smart move diplomatically.
Thank you for agreeing that Palestine is not a sovereign state. The reasoning is irrelevant as to the accuracy of my statement.
And once again, Geno, if they'd only accepted that land that they were offered in 1948, things would be a lot different. Bad decisions by bad leaders have repercussions. The Palestinians have been the masters of their own demise.
Harris clearly understands the system she is in.
As we've discussed before, you don't.
To be fair, you are not remotely alone in this.
Ah, we are back to you claiming superior insight.
You are on record for arguing:
1) You need third parties for democracy
2) If you vote for a third party you don't understand democracy
3) Its pragmatic to vote for aiding genocide
Look at this list.
It's clear you aren't ever going to understand the issue, or even what I am saying on it.
You are on the record articulating those positions.
Feel free to clarify your statements.
I would if I thought you would learn something, but you've made it very clear you aren't going to.
I can lead a horse to water, but I can't make him drink.
Last edited:
