Steeles Royal

Israel at war

Klatuu

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2022
6,576
3,958
113
The demographics are what they are.

You think the native American population would be as small without the white man's diseases? At a certain point, you have to go with the current situation.
That’s just a nonsensical word salad.

Talk about the depopulation of the indigenous Palestinian population. There is ample scholarship and documentation available.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
96,043
24,619
113
No government or army is going to agree not to target terrorists who deliberately surround themselves with human shields.

It would mean that HAMAS - or AQ or ISIS or any rightie neo nazi group - could do 7 October and then retreat into a human shield. It would make it impossible for legitimate governments to protect their own citizens.
But Israel does not have the legal right to self defence against the people they occupy in the first place.
The occupation is illegal
The blockade is illegal
Every settlement is illegal
Apartheid is illegal

You can't then use the claim that there are human shields to kill civilians.
If shack held you at gunpoint as a human shield the cops in Toronto would not be justified in killing you both to get squeezer.
Same in Gaza, you can't kill 70% women and children and then claim you were only aiming at Hamas.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
96,043
24,619
113
But the targets were NOT the civilian population. They were HAMAS. Who used human shields.
Even if that were the case then its still the war crime of disproportionate response.
If that were the case.

Not to mention the seige that has blocked all food, water and power.
That is clearly targeting all the people in Gaza including civilians.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
22,224
17,289
113
But Israel does not have the legal right to self defence against the people they occupy in the first place.
The occupation is illegal
The blockade is illegal
Every settlement is illegal
Apartheid is illegal

You can't then use the claim that there are human shields to kill civilians.
If shack held you at gunpoint as a human shield the cops in Toronto would not be justified in killing you both to get squeezer.
Same in Gaza, you can't kill 70% women and children and then claim you were only aiming at Hamas.
Of course not, Israel should open the gates and welcome Hamas and its fighters in for some coffee and crumpets.

ps...Squeezer would never be in the open or among the civilian population. It's the brothels that would have to be deeeeeep underground for everyone's safety.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,838
102,810
113
That’s just a nonsensical word salad.

Talk about the depopulation of the indigenous Palestinian population. There is ample scholarship and documentation available.
You miss my point, which is that you have to deal with the current population mix - which is 73% Jewish - if you're going to realistically and pragmatically discuss the future and its alternative choices.

Can I make it any simpler for you? Or is even this still a "word salad"?
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,838
102,810
113

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,838
102,810
113
But Israel does not have the legal right to self defence against the people they occupy in the first place.
The occupation is illegal
The blockade is illegal
Every settlement is illegal
Apartheid is illegal
All that stuff is perfectly legal, except perhaps for the settlements, which are - unfortunately - winked at by the Israeli government.
You can't then use the claim that there are human shields to kill civilians.
If shack held you at gunpoint as a human shield the cops in Toronto would not be justified in killing you both to get squeezer.
Same in Gaza, you can't kill 70% women and children and then claim you were only aiming at Hamas.
But Shack wouldn't routinely go out to mass murder and rape and then surround himself with women and children and yell "Fuck you, war criminal!" at the police who try to arrest him.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
79,838
102,810
113
There is no requirement for "demographic balance" which is basically justifications for ethno-states. Can you imagine Trudeau saying that? Or Biden? Or anyone else in any other part of the world?

Just bring everyone under 1 government, give them equal rights and perhaps work toward a system where Israel becomes a full constitutional, secular democracy.

But the goal of the Israeli state is to take as much from the Palestinians as possible and push and squeeze them into as small a land area as possible. Which is the crime here.
But that wouldn't work, would it?

Because the Palestinians hate the Jews and are influenced and dominated by extremist Islamic groups like HAMAS.

If shit like 7 October didn't take place, you might have an argument.

Look at the Muslim regimes in the Middle East and tell me if you love them:..... Iran - repressive, vicious, fundamentalist Islamic theocracy; Saudi - repressive, vicious, fundamentalist Islamic monarchy; Syria - repressive, vicious, dictatorship, riven with civil war; Lebanon - recovering from decades of sectarian strife; Turkey - repressive, vicious, fundamentalist Islamic pseudo democracy.

It's not as though Israel is right next to France and Belgium. peaceful, tolerant, democratic countries.

And all those Muslim countries hate Israel. How long would it take before Palestinians vote to drive out the Jews, if they had the vote in Israel?
 

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
10,247
10,141
113
But that wouldn't work, would it?

Because the Palestinians hate the Jews and are influenced and dominated by extremist Islamic groups like HAMAS.

If shit like 7 October didn't take place, you might have an argument.

Look at the Muslim regimes in the Middle East and tell me if you love them:..... Iran - repressive, vicious, fundamentalist Islamic theocracy; Saudi - repressive, vicious, fundamentalist Islamic monarchy; Syria - repressive, vicious, dictatorship, riven with civil war; Lebanon - recovering from decades of sectarian strife; Turkey - repressive, vicious, fundamentalist Islamic pseudo democracy.

It's not as though Israel is right next to France and Belgium. peaceful, tolerant, democratic countries.

And all those Muslim countries hate Israel. How long would it take before Palestinians vote to drive out the Jews, if they had the vote in Israel?
But why let reality stand in the way of virtue signaling?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

Klatuu

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2022
6,576
3,958
113
You miss my point, which is that you have to deal with the current population mix - which is 73% Jewish - if you're going to realistically and pragmatically discuss the future and its alternative choices.

Can I make it any simpler for you? Or is even this still a "word salad"?
Still a word salad. Deal with the forced depopulation of the original Palestinian inhabitants and all that follows from it. Its real. It’s fully documented and resources are at your fingertips. It’s covered by international human rights law. It will explain why the percentage of Jews is 73%. It will explain why millions of Palestinians lost their homes and property.

There is nothing real or pragmatic about ignoring it. It’s racist and delusional.
 
Last edited:

Paprika

Well-known member
Jan 1, 2020
367
459
63
Still a word salad. Deal with the forced depopulation of the original Palestinian inhabitants and all that follows from it. Its real. It’s fully documented and resources are at your fingertips. It’s covered by international human rights law. It will explain why the percentage of Jews is 73%. It will explain why millions of Palestinians lost their homes and property.

There is nothing real or pragmatic about ignoring it. It’s racist and delusional.
Many people lose their homes and property in every war, like those Syrians. No point arguing who is an "original inhabitant". If they had won in 1948, the jews would have lost their homes and property.

Would you fight for the human rights of those original inhabitants of Carthage after they got destroyed by Rome? Would you move back to Africa where your ancestor was an "original inhabitant".

Don't bring up "international human rights law" unless somebody could somehow enforce it.
 

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
10,247
10,141
113
There was no call to action for violence there. Intifada means "civil uprising". A civil uprising is not a call to action for violence and even more importantly it is not a call to action for violence, IN CANADA. So no laws were broken here.
Civil uprising my fucking ass


The following is a partial list of civilian casualties in the Second Intifada.

According to the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism, 887 (78 percent) of the 1,137 Israelis killed in attacks from September 2000 – 2005 were civilians.[1] Another 8,341 Israelis were wounded during this period, including 5,676 civilians and 2,665 security forces personnel.[2] The majority of casualties were caused by suicide bombings, though Israelis have also been killed by planted bombs, shootings, stonings, stabbings, lynchings, rockets, and other methods of attack.[2]

According to B'Tselem, in the ten years from 2000–2010, of the 6371 Palestinians killed by Israeli forces, at least 2996 did not participate in hostilities when killed, and 1317 were minors. Out of 1083 Israelis killed, 741 were civilians (124 minors).[3]
 
Toronto Escorts