CupidS Escorts
Vaughan Spa

Israel at war

Previous Thread Next Thread
C

Conil

Well-known member
Apr 12, 2013
4,434
1,312
113
This is why you can't trust the UN. They should shut them down and let the 160 Muslim countries (or whatever the numbers) have their own group.

UN agency staff celebrated Oct. 7 Hamas massacre of Israeli civilians

Teachers at Palestinian schools run by the UN agency responsible for Palestinian refugees celebrated Hamas’ Oct. 7 massacre against Israel and are part of a “national strategy to commit acts of terror,” the head of a watchdog group told The Algemeiner following the release of the group’s new bombshell report on the matter.

At least 14 teachers at schools run by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) publicly celebrated the Hamas atrocities on their social media accounts, with one calling the morning of Oct. 7 an “unforgettable glorious morning,” a report released on Monday by the Institute for Monitoring Peace and Cultural Tolerance in School Education (IMPACT-se) found.

The report also identified at least 100 Hamas terrorists who are graduates of UNRWA’s educating system. It highlighted Amer Yaser Nazmi Sada, whose diploma was found in the vehicle of one of the terrorists who participated in the Oct. 7 slaughter of Israeli families. The diploma, granted to Sada in 2018 upon his graduation, was signed by the chief of UNRWA’s vocational program in Gaza, Farid Ajmi’an Abu Adhira.

One UNRWA employee in Gaza, Mahmoud Abu Adhm, uploaded several posts supporting the massacre by Hamas, the report showed. In one, posted three days after the attack, Abu Adhm urged the Palestinian terrorist group to kill Israeli hostages, citing Islamic texts: “Do not walk past a captive who has not been given amnesty without striking off his neck so as to terrorize the enemy.”

IMPACT-se CEO Marcus Sheff told The Algemeiner: “When you teach young people to cut the neck of the enemy, do not be surprised when you see acts like that.”

“When you teach young people that Jews should be exterminated, do not be surprised when that is what they attempt to do,” he added.

In another instance, the official Facebook page of an UNRWA elementary school in the West Bank city of Nablus posted a video of a school rally held on Oct. 26 featuring a young boy, accompanied by what seems to be an UNRWA administrator, calling for victory for Hamas’ “jihad warriors” in Gaza and evoking the defeat of the Jews at Khaybar at the hands of Muhammad’s forces in 628 CE….

www.algemeiner.com

UN Agency Staff Celebrated Oct. 7 Massacre, Part of ‘Terror Strategy’ at Root of Hamas Attack, Watchdog Says - Algemeiner.com

Teachers at Palestinian schools run by the UN agency responsible for Palestinian refugees celebrated Hamas' Oct. 7 massacre against Israel and are part of a "national strategy to commit acts of terror," the head of a watchdog group told The Algemeiner following the release of the group's new...
www.algemeiner.com www.algemeiner.com
 
  • Sad
Reactions: mitchell76
C

Conil

Well-known member
Apr 12, 2013
4,434
1,312
113
More Hamas style behavior

France: Muslim disrupts mass with screams of ‘Allahu akbar’

A mass celebrated by a priest in the Saint-Éloi church in Dunkirk (North), Sunday November 5, was disrupted by an individual who distinctly shouted “Allah Akbar” twice, Le Figaro learned from a police source. The individual in question, who was on the right wing of the church, shouted during the “Our Father” and then at the end of the mass. According to the priest, this man seemed “disturbed.”
Of course. That’s always the excuse from authorities who don’t want to admit the reality of jihad.

An open investigation
“An investigation was opened as soon as these facts were revealed to the police on Monday November 6,” confirms the public prosecutor of Dunkirk, Charlotte Huet. “The investigations aim in particular to collect testimonies in order to identify the perpetrator, who is currently unknown,” continues the prosecutor.
According to the latest available figures, collected during a parliamentary mission, 1,659 anti-religious acts were recorded in 2021. Among them, there were 857 anti-Christian acts, 589 anti-Semitic acts and 213 anti-Muslim acts.
Click to expand...
www.lefigaro.fr

Dunkerque : une messe perturbée aux cris d’«Allah Akbar»

Une enquête a été ouverte, lundi, afin d’identifier l’auteur des faits.
www.lefigaro.fr www.lefigaro.fr
 
C

Conil

Well-known member
Apr 12, 2013
4,434
1,312
113
Lesbians' for Gaza. Really? They clearly don't now what happens to Gays in many Muslim countries. In Lebanon they would send guys to doctors to see if their butt was enlarged. I thought Lebanon is more advanced than that.

 
  • Like
Reactions: drewstar and mitchell76
F

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
97,101
25,413
113
shack said:
This is hate speech.
Click to expand...
How is this hate speech, shack?

Squeezer, like you, keeps arguing that giving Palestinians the vote would end Israel.
That is an admission that the both of you think that Israel can only exist as an apartheid state without equal rights.

Unless your goal is genocide or ethnic cleansing.
Oh, right, I forgot about your goals.

Maybe you do have another final solution in mind.
 
C

Conil

Well-known member
Apr 12, 2013
4,434
1,312
113
He gets emotional recalling the video of the massacre of October 7 that was screened at the Israel consulate in Toronto. The article is also very good. I bet if we see the video, we'll understand why Israel is not stopping.

KINSELLA: It was up to journalists to expose Hamas' delight in savagery


Don’t make it about you.
That’s one of the first things we learned in journalism school. First-person writing wasn’t completely outlawed — but, if your story had “I” and “me” in it, you had to have a very good reason.

And: what you feel, as a writer, was irrelevant. What matters is how the people you’re writing about feel. Their feelings matter a lot more than yours.

Journalists and writers started to violate these rules in the early 70s. Tom Wolfe, Truman Capote, Hunter S. Thompson, Joan Didion, Ta-Nahisi Coates, James Baldwin and others started to place themselves in their stories — and they started to sell lots of books and magazines and newspapers.

Some, like George Plimpton, even got into the boxing ring so he could write more vividly about boxing. The new approaches had different names: Participative Journalism, New Journalism. Traditionalists didn’t like it, but the first-person approach attracted converts.

Sitting in a darkened room at the Israeli Consulate in Toronto this week, watching unspeakable horrors unfold on a screen, I — sorry — remembered these journalism rules. They created a dilemma.

torontosun.com

KINSELLA: It was up to journalists to expose Hamas' delight in savagery

Most of us present broke one of the most important rules of journalism. We wrote in the first person, and we wrote what we were feeling.
torontosun.com torontosun.com
 
L

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
10,375
10,372
113
Kautilya said:
I dont see a problem with posters, but I also do not see a point to it. What use is posting posters of hostages here in the west when they are being held in Gaza? Also why aren't there posters of dead Palestinian children or the 1000s being held in custody without trial?

Anyway, yes I do believe targeting Hamas' leadership would work the same way it did when Al-Qaeda and ISIS leaders were targeted. The groups still exist but are weaker.

And yes Israel means to punish Gaza and take land. Hence the bombing to get people to leave, under the guise of fighting Hamas. Without Hamas, where would Bibi be in his political career. So he is perhaps secretively thanking his stars there was a terror attack lol, or he was about to be flushed down the political sewer as it were.
Click to expand...
Well as far as I am concerned you and other virtue signallers in this thread and elsewhere just help the evil in this world, first and foremost Iran.
Every pro Palestinian demonstration or action helps Iran and also helps Russia.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: mitchell76, Kautilya, mandrill and 1 other person
mandrill

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
80,737
106,283
113
Kautilya said:
I realized there is no point debating with people whose reasons for supporting Israel are one of the following:

1. They are Jewish. - toguy5252, xmontrealer and perhaps basketcase (who has been mostly absent from this thread, may be because the deaths are getting to him) etc., fall in this category.
2. They are simply supporting Israel, because of group dynamics - siding with the majority. I suspect Mandrill falls in this category, because he initially literally said that Israel is indiscriminately bombing the Palestinians. lol.
3. They are racist and hate Muslims or experience selective empathy based on skin colour, culture and religious belief. These are the ones who stereotype and gloat on the deaths of the Palestinians. You know who they are.
4. They are white and think they need to be "good white people" and support the Jews because apparently antisemitism is the biggest kind of racism there is. Because you know, the holocaust. These are the ones who constantly keep deluding themselves talking about how Israel is defending itself, or that Hamas is their focus when evidence and past behaviour is glaringly the opposite. The majority like - shack, squeezer, Leimonis etc., fall in this category I suspect.

None of these can be rationalized with.

You can only argue with people who are interested in making fact based decisions and are willing to change their minds. That is something you can address, but not the others.
Click to expand...
You don't really take in anything that you read and don't like, do you? 😼
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leimonis
B

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,722
5,659
113
Kautilya said:
I realized there is no point debating with people whose reasons for supporting Israel are one of the following:

1. They are Jewish. - toguy5252, xmontrealer and perhaps basketcase (who has been mostly absent from this thread, may be because the deaths are getting to him) etc., fall in this category.
2. They are simply supporting Israel, because of group dynamics - siding with the majority. I suspect Mandrill falls in this category, because he initially literally said that Israel is indiscriminately bombing the Palestinians. lol.
3. They are racist and hate Muslims or experience selective empathy based on skin colour, culture and religious belief. These are the ones who stereotype and gloat on the deaths of the Palestinians. You know who they are.
4. They are white and think they need to be "good white people" and support the Jews because apparently antisemitism is the biggest kind of racism there is. Because you know, the holocaust. These are the ones who constantly keep deluding themselves talking about how Israel is defending itself, or that Hamas is their focus when evidence and past behaviour is glaringly the opposite. The majority like - shack, squeezer, Leimonis etc., fall in this category I suspect.

None of these can be rationalized with.

You can only argue with people who are interested in making fact based decisions and are willing to change their minds. That is something you can address, but not the others.
Click to expand...
400,000 Yemeni Killed, 200,000 Syrians, countless Libyians, 8 years of war between Iran/Iraq, There is lots more.

Who is being selective about who commits war crimes exactly?
 
  • Like
Reactions: drewstar and mandrill
The Oracle

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
28,142
56,563
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
  • Sad
Reactions: xmontrealer and mitchell76
You must log in or register to reply here.
Ashley Madison
Previous Thread Next Thread
Toronto Escorts
Top Bottom