Israel at war

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,806
22,230
113
  • Like
Reactions: Klatuu

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
9,798
9,551
113
Arab Israelis live peacefully though and as modern citizens. Palestinians are not allowed to progress because of the misadventures of their leaders, and the oppression from Isarel. Very sad.
misadventure is when one slips on a banana peel. When you vote to be governed by terrorists and absorb their ideology it should be called something different, no?
 

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
9,798
9,551
113
Terrorist is a western word. They dont call them or consider them that. I mean generally speaking, one mans terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. But they live in such an oppressive environment, they see Hamas as the only ones standing up for them. They feel the entire world supports Israel but no one except Hamas supports them. It is why Hamas enjoys support.
well, Dagestani Muslims support them

edit - axis of evil become more obvious - Russia and Iran with its proxies hamas and hesbolla are on the same side.
which side are you all on?
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Kautilya

Klatuu

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2022
5,822
3,370
113
Israeli women have freedom to make whatever videos they like. Muslim women would be stoned to death for that video.

Oppression of women is your thing, obviously. I suspect that you must be anti-abortion, anti birth control, women should not work and just be baby factories.

You are brainwashed.
The IDF is putting out these videos of female soldiers while 1400 Israelis are dead? No wonder they were routed by Hamas on Oct 7. Canada certainly doesn’t treat its female soldiers in this way. Nor does the US or any other country, Sad Shack.
 

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,435
1,761
113
It worked dropping Fat Man and Little boy killing mostly civilians forcing Japan to surrender and ending WW2. I know it's not the same circumstance as what you're asking but I suspect that was his thought.
Palestinian civilians have been harbouring hamas terrorists for decades.
Sleep with dogs don't be shocked when you catch flees.
The nuclear attacks on Japan are actually the perfect example to demonstrate the rules of war.

First, the attacks were not punitive. It was not simple retaliation or lust for war. If they were, they would be a war crime.

Secondly, the attacks pass the proportional proportionality analysis. In the case of Hiroshima, the military objectives were the neutralizing of the 2nd General Army, the 59th Army, the 5th Division, the 224th Division, 5 anti-aircraft batteries under the 22nd separate and 45th separate anti-aircraft battalions and the 121st and 122nd anti-aircraft regiments, it was the location of a supply and logistics headquarters, it was a stepping off port for the movement of troops, and it had factories for the manufacture of aircraft, ships, bombs, rifles and handguns. Those are clearly defined military objectives. Hiroshima housed over 440,000 soldiers with only about 340,000 civilians, and the end goal was to end the war without engaging in a land invasion which would necessarily include bombing and naval bombardment and was estimated to cost millions of military and some number more then that civilian lives on the Japanese side alone.

For Nagasaki, it was a naval industrial hub housing almost all of Japan's naval manufacturing as well as a supply and logistics port. Despite these military objectives, the loss of life was still considered, primarily it was one of the least populated cities with military objectives and of all potential targets had the largest number of people involved in military manufacturing at over 90% of all persons present. At the time of the raid, it was estimated that less than 300,000 people were in the area, and that primary goal again factored in the millions of lives that would be lost in the event of a land invasion.

The result was a significant shortening of the war, the decimation of Japanese military manufacturing, particularly naval manufacturing, the neutralization of an entire General Army and several smaller units, and the savings of millions of lives that would be lost in a land invasion, at the expenditure of about 600,000 civilians. The Japanese Imperial Army had told the allies they would need to defeat 20 million Japanese soldiers, and civilian losses are always higher, so 600,000 civilians and 500,000 soldiers were compared to 40+ million Japanese and some dozen or more million allied soldiers. Under proportional proportionality analysis, the bombings were not war crimes.

The post I replied to had said Israel was attacking civilians deliberately in order to get to them to give up their support of Hamas. If so, that is indeed a war crime. That is not a defined military objective as it is pure reciprocity. It's also illogical and insane to think killing someone's family and destroying their home is going to get them to hate your enemy. They're just going to hate you. Israeli is creating more Hamas support, not reducing it. It's also never worked in history. It's a losing strategy. Either Israel has lost their mind, that's not the objective at all, or they are simply killing Gazans for the sake of killing Gazans. It was too be one of those three. It's possible there's some objective we don't know about, and possibly that would pass the proportional proportionality analysis, but no military expert that's studied this that I follow can find that. The conclusion in military circles is clear: Israel is engaged in war crimes.

I admire Israel for trying other means for decades.
I don't necessarily disagree with you. I do, however, still disagree that they are justified in committing purely punitive attacks against a civilian population in direct violation of the Geneva and Hague Conventions, and I think it's lunacy to believe that the result will somehow be less support for Hamas.
 
Last edited:

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,435
1,761
113
I'd phrase it this way.

They have no choice but to target areas populated by civilians where they KNOW Hamas is operating and using those civilians as shields.

Israel knows that the world is watching and holding Israel to a higher standard. They have to be certain of what they are doing.
You can phrase it any way you want. It's a war crime and murdering someone's family and destroying their home is not going to make them love you and hate your enemy.

Israel has some of the best special forces in the world. They could deal with suspected Hamas positions without indiscriminately bombing civilians hoping some of them are Hamas members.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,619
4,820
113
You can phrase it any way you want. It's a war crime and murdering someone's family and destroying their home is not going to make them love you and hate your enemy.

Israel has some of the best special forces in the world. They could deal with suspected Hamas positions without indiscriminately bombing civilians hoping some of them are Hamas members.
So there were no homes, no kids in the Nuke attacks on Japan?

And you actually think there was no payback involved for Pearl Harbour?
 

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,435
1,761
113
So there were no homes, no kids in the Nuke attacks on Japan?
You can go back and read I my post were I explain the nuclear bombs dropped on Japan and the civilian losses and why it's different than Gaza, but I know you won't because I've dealt with it before. I'm open to discussions with people that have proven they act in good faith, but that isn't you. Troll somewhere else.

And you actually think there was no payback involved for Pearl Harbour?
I think you've quoted the wrong post. Regardless...

Nowhere did I say that. Like I said: troll elsewhere. You've made it clear you're not interested in a good faith debate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kautilya and Klatuu

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,619
4,820
113
You can go back and read I my post were I explain the nuclear bombs dropped on Japan and the civilian losses and why it's different than Gaza, but I know you won't because I've dealt with it before. I'm open to discussions with people that have proven they act in good faith, but that isn't you. Troll somewhere else.


I think you've quoted the wrong post. Regardless...

Nowhere did I say that. Like I said: troll elsewhere. You've made it clear you're not interested in a good faith debate.
Its not trolling. You are trying to claim the civilian casualties in Japan were justified because of proximity to miitary targets, yet claim Palestinian casualties in proximity to Hamas military targets are not.

Its that simple.

And btw urban warfare against an entrenched and prepared opponent is the worst bloodiest kind there is. Special forces are not the answer. They have to go building to building, clear, check for IEDs and tunnels, continue. With no Iron dome for rockets Hamas will use. And Hamas will use innocents as shields and bait. This is going to a long bloody battle that will result in 10 of thousands of casualties on both sides.
 
Last edited:

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,435
1,761
113
Its not trolling. You are trying to claim the civilian casualties in Japan were justified because of proximity to miitary targets, yet claim Palestinian casualties in proximity to Hamas military targets are not. Its that simple.
Yes, misrepresentating arguments is simple.

And btw urban warfare against an entrenched and prepared opponent is the worst bloodiest kind there is.
One of us is a military veteran qualified to speak on that subject, the other is a troll speaking out of his ass.

Special forces are not the answer. They have to go building to building, clear, check for IEDs and tunnels, continue.
Why do they have to go building to building checking if Israel knows where the targets are? The only reason they'd have to go building to building is if Israel doesn't know where the targets are, in which case you've lost the argument that they're not just bombing civilians hoping to hit Hamas but rather are bombing military targets.

With no Iron dome for rockets Hamas will use.
Why don't they have Iron Dome?

And Hamas will use innocents as shields and bait. This is going to a long bloody battle that will result in 10 of thousands of casualties on both sides.
But it would cost far fewer lives if they didn't indiscriminately bomb civilians.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,619
4,820
113
Yes, misrepresentating arguments is simple.



One of us is a military veteran qualified to speak on that subject, the other is a troll speaking out of his ass.



Why do they have to go building to building checking if Israel knows where the targets are? The only reason they'd have to go building to building is if Israel doesn't know where the targets are, in which case you've lost the argument that they're not just bombing civilians hoping to hit Hamas but rather are bombing military targets.



Why don't they have Iron Dome?


But it would cost far fewer lives if they didn't indiscriminately bomb civilians.
I don't believe you are a military person.

The above assessment pretty much proves it. Every military expert I've seen discussing this is saying what I'm saying above. They have a Marine General in Israel advising them now. Israel is indeed moving in with heavy vehicles and going building to building.

Cripes, did you ever stop to think that the enemy built all those tunnels so they can move and ambush? With entrances in residential homes, shops and schools? There literally is no safe zone, no place that can go unchecked.

Hamas has designed a nightmare scenario with 300 miles of tunnels and fanatic fighters ready to die. All fully stocked with arms, and supplies for months. Trained to know where and how to inflict maximum casualties if they can before dying. Their goal here isn't peace, or negotiations. Its to kill as many Jews as many military personal as possible, while filming it all and editing it for propaganda.

Thats the reality of what is happening.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts