How the Biden manipulation and the Kamala switch went down will be discussed by the Trump campaign. Nothing is going to change that. Win or lose, the Kamala campaign is not organic nor will it likely be perfectly executed. Obama was the last perfectly executed campaign. You just have to accept criticism of her campaign especially when it is a matter of fact.My point is that no one - aside from a handful of GOP-supporting political buffs - really cares that the way Harris got nommed was irregular. Shit happens and it happened in the Dem party this year. Once in a lifetime, maybe. But that's how shit rolls.
So maybe it's more useful to focus on the issues of the campaign than to continually suggest that Biden was coup d'etat-ed and Harris is somehow an improper choice for the nom.
I've admitted here the Democrats have done an excellent job of launching Kamala Harris' campaign. I however said the Democrats blew through several warning signs over the last seven months to get to this point. Seriously, someone close to Biden saved the Democrats in 2024 by scheduling that debate in June and not later.
It's far too early. Trump is not executing a great strategy. He should just shut up until after the Democratic convention. Harris is riding a Biden relief wave.I've got a question for you btw. Given Trump's very sparse campaign schedule and the wet splat that JDV has made, will Trump stay the course, or will he either pull out altogether or will he fight a half-hearted campaign and claim it was unwinnable when he loses in October?
As far as JDV, neither party really selected VPs that speak to the center. They are marginally regional sons of the old Blue Wall. And sure, I think Trump should have selected Rubio or Scott. He's probably kicking himself for listening to Don Jr.