Get ready Kamala fans...this is just the beginning
- Thread starter Butler1000
- Start date
She did today just before boarding her plane. Trump is in trouble Mitchy, big trouble.
Elon Musk gets BAD NEWS over Trump-linked scam PAC
Here you go Mitchy, don't worry. She is on the ball and will do things her way when and where she decided to do so.
I've opened the door now LET US IN!!!!!!!!!!! The WOKE train is coming into your living room and you're going to LIKE IT!!!!
Here's the thing because you and another member today said he has no real policies. His detractors seem to bounce from he has no real policies to OMG Project 25 is going to take us back decades. I don't think they both can be true at the same time. Keenly listening to partisan rhetoric is a fun exercise in mental acuity.
If you said the Biden Administration has lots of policies. I would totally agree with you. They have lots and lots of policies. They have policies about things that even politically active people have never contemplated. Many here might see this in your own Trudeau Administration. They have a policy for every ill and every perceived ill affecting Canadians.
Now, we can't really have a reasonable discussion about a statement that Trump has no policies. It routinely devolves from mentioning his policies followed by non sequiturs criticizing the very policies that one initially claimed don't exist.
That's going to be tampons don excuse when he loses again - rigged election because kamala shouldn't have been allowed to run. This guy is digging hinself in a hole to chiner. His attacks at kamala are not only insulting to minorities but all women.
Pretty damn stupid thing to say. She graduated law school Donnie got someone to write his exams at Waldo
I don't think he gives a shit about Project 25. If he is elected, he will probably go along with P 25 because many of his allies foster that imbecile, wacko pile of shit. But he DGAF. His policy is that he's amazing and he deserves to win.
Not really, Earp. But you do you.
Have it your own way, Earp. If you need to end our dialogue on your own little bang, go ahead.
Why, they have never had to pay almost $1B for lying to their audience.
https://x.com/MeidasTouch/status/1821642233571123578
Not for $1 billion, but they have been sued before for making false news reports
https://thenationaltriallawyers.org...after-275-million-lawsuit-with-nick-sandmann/
CNN Hit With Defamation Lawsuit in Florida Over Alleged False Narrative About Afghanistan Evacuations | Daily Business Review
“The Most Trusted Name in News” is in the hot seat for sensational reporting that allegedly failed to include basic due diligence to ensure its accuracy, according to new claims in a federal lawsuit.
www.law.com
It's on appeal and a far cry from almost $1B and still more is coming for lying FOX FAKE NEWS as the other voting company which has yet to be settled.Not for $1 billion, but they have been sued before for making false news reports
https://thenationaltriallawyers.org...after-275-million-lawsuit-with-nick-sandmann/
CNN Hit With Defamation Lawsuit in Florida Over Alleged False Narrative About Afghanistan Evacuations | Daily Business Review
“The Most Trusted Name in News” is in the hot seat for sensational reporting that allegedly failed to include basic due diligence to ensure its accuracy, according to new claims in a federal lawsuit.
Degrading women and minorities are what drives a lot of his base, just saying...
Facts are facts, only righties like them alternative facts. Obviously, some are amused by things they can't understand...
Sandmann settlement is not on appeal. CNN paid that one out
Technically no one voted for Biden, either.
They voted for delegates who were obligated to vote for Biden if he didn't drop out.
Yes, 1968 provoked reform because people didn't like the system being all insiders.
But it is still convoluted and indirect. It's still a mish-mash of popular vote, votes from registered members, votes from insiders, and so on.
The perception of the primary process is very different from the reality. (Which is also true of the presidential vote as well.)
They are different in details, of course.
I do think that LBJ - who was very sick and had a weak heart - was already looking for a way not to run. The Vietnam negotiations gave him that option.
(The fact the polling was shit also played a role.)
So how it all got provoked and when is very different.
Not at all.
Delegates vote for the nominee, not people.
That's the same as it ever was.
I have no idea how that would go.
Assuming Trump decided to step down, I doubt very much he would do what Biden did and support a successor and help push for an orderly transfer of power.
One of the reasons the GOP hasn't been able to get rid of Trump is that they haven't been willing to all get behind one person to be the focus of the party and take the succession.
I suspect it would be utter chaos.
But to be fair, I had no faith the Democrats would be able to have a smooth transition, which is the main reason I opposed Biden dropping out.
I was totally wrong there, so who knows?
I don't think that's fair.
Earp said this hadn't happened before and I drew the 1968 parallel.
Earp, not without reason, thinks the overall situation is too different for that to be a good comparison.
I don't even think he's particularly wrong, I think people view the primaries differently than before and the lateness of the withdrawal also changes the dynamic.
That said, I don't think mechanically it is all that different - it is mostly a question of perception.
(Which goes both ways. Humphrey's win was not viewed by the Democratic electorate at large the same way Harris's seems to be.)
Last edited:
