Spuds said:
But, & that's a big but, if they are not able to contribute, then keep them out.
Why?
In a country as wealthy and privileged as ours, why should what "they can do for us" be the only criteria upon which we judge someone's suitability to come to Canada? What is so wrong with making a humanitarian decision, as opposed to a simple economic one?
It seems that anyone who claims refugee status is allowed into the country.
Really? Do you have any facts to back that up?
"we don't have the funds to start tracking them down"
We agree on this point. The process should be faster and those who are rejected out should be kicked out, no matter what! To do otherwise undermines public faith in the entire process and taints the reputation of legitimate refugee claimants.
...idiotic, keep them out in the first place.
Why? Just because a small percentage abuse the system, others shouldn't be penalized.
An example, I was talking to a fellow from Cuba a while ago, he moved here with his wife and new born baby about three years ago. In telling me his story he said that he didn't speak the language, his wife still doesn't, and he runs a cleaning business. He had no particular skills, so that is what he does.
I fail to see anything wrong with this situation. We've allowed a family to escape from a Communist dictatorship, and they've become hard working taxpayers. What's the problem with that?
Now, can a Canadian not clean?
Sigh. Are you really that ignorant?
I don't think this kind of xenophobia even merits a response.
under no circumstances should we allow immigrants to enter from a country that we are fighting.
What country would that be?
The last time I checked, Canada wasn't at war with any country.
Even if we were, why should that preclude accepting people fleeing persecution in said countries? Doesn't that just make sense?
I call it bullshit, these guys are killing our boys. keep them out.
What guys?
Keep who out?
It's time we stopped this political correct bullshit
What bullshit? Are you hyperventilating?
and started showing some backbone.
Huh?
It's a sad state of affairs when a person cannot voice an opinion that is unpopular without being labelled a racist.
If the statement is racist then it deserves to be identified as such. The relative popularity (or lack thereof) of the statement is immaterial.
it's what you do that amkes you the person you are, not were your from.
Really? Virtually everything you've argued above contradicts that statement.
ask any vet still living, 90% will tell you that we should close the doors.
Yes, because Lord knows that you've conducted a scientific sample with an unbiased questionnaire.
What people?
guys with obvious ties to trerrorism.
Okay, so you're back on the Khadrs and off your generally anti-refugee rant?
The Khadrs are scum, but they are
Canadian citizens. They are not refugees seeking asylum, they are CANADIANS. Not landed immigrants - CANADIAN CITIZENS.
If they have terrorist ties, they should be charged, tried, and upon conviction, locked up to rot.
To use those jerks as the basis for your anti-refugee rantings, however, is spurious and bigoted.