I tried it for first time and became neurotic. Hard to explain but I knew I was stoned so I knew I had to wait it out. I was aware of the neurosis so I new enough not to drive . Horrible experience. Anyone else has this happen?
Never a great idea to drive, so at-least you made a good decision.
This has not ever happened to me. I also recommend a high CBD strain over a high THC strain should you ever want to try again.
That's misleading. For all intents and purposes people didn't even know how to grow cannabis in the 60s-80s. Marijuana has only recently been perfected. The LSD, however, was dosed way higher and easily accessible. You win some, you lose some.
You could absolutely be right, but I understand it a little differently.
If I'm correct LSD is just LSD. It's neither strong nor weak, it just is. What's different is the amount of LSD that people are taking.
I think we're saying the same thing in terms of dosing, but I definitely disagree on the implication that it's quality, a chef's craftsmanship or it's availability is in decline.
I wish I remember this useless knowledge exactly as it was written when I learned it, but back in the day, cooks, even Owsley, were a lot less scientific in-terms of dosage. The blotter paper absorbed the chemical in a far less predicatable way. Different chemists cooked in different ways but generally, it had a tendency to dramatically weaken days after being applied to blotter paper (as much as 30% within the first few days). So, cooks tended to use a large chunk of blotter paper to offset doseage weakening over time. If you got on it fast, or the cook applied too much LSD onto the medium, BAM! Acid test acid.
Nowadays, I'm told, it's a pretty standard dose on micro dots blotter paper no matter where you are - assuming you actually bought acid. Whereas tabs in the 60s and 70s were often the size of your thumbnail, now you could fit 8 micro dots in the same space. The new medium and application practices have stabilized LSD dosage strength, and it now remains at the same level of effective strength for months, maybe even years.
You can't really compare a standard blotter tab from the 60s or 70s to a micro tab today. Some tabs would be much stronger than what's around, some would be much weaker on a tab for tab basis. The difference is that most LSD, if it actually is LSD, today is predictable in-terms of strength from one chemist's kitchen to another (or from one tab to another on the same sheet).
If you've ever thought the acid was better by comparison, there's a good chance you didn't take enough of the new stuff. At $3 - $7 a hit for a micro tab in today's dollars, double-dosing won't break the bank, but it might ruin your day
If we're talking liquid LSD, totally different animal. Who knows what was added to make it safe for human consumption in any amount greater than a small drop?
As far as accessibility goes, I think you'd be surprised by how little it's changed. Especially if you hang out with people seedy enough to still do drugs. Inarguably, teenagers do less drugs now, so the market most actively covered by news media has largely disappeared. As a result, we hear about it a lot less.
There aren't a lot of concerned parents ranting about this and other drugs these days, but there are still a ton of people with jobs raving on them on their weekends in this city and most others.
Or so I'm told...