.....from the persecution of Arab Zionists.
.....from the persecution of Arab Zionists.
Which is why Israel's goal is to prevent Oct. 7 from happening again.
I'm glad we agree. They need to prevent Arab Zionism from raising it's ugly head again.
Arab Zionism is a valid and real concept. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
I am more consistent and I'm less prejudiced.Are you still thinking you're smarter than the UN, Amnesty, HRW et al with your 'citizenship' qualifier?
Those are the goals of Hamas. Arab Zionism.Nah, its mostly colonization, apartheid and genocide.
GenocideJew(nocide) bugs my ass.
And the people who do it.
These threads go on because Arab Zionists like you keep defending the heinous acts of terrorist groups like Hamas on Oct. 7 to further their Zionist goals of creating a Muslim state in the current Israel and ethnically cleansing that land of any and all Jews.That's why these threads go on, because zionists keep defending more and more heinous shite.
If you read the reports you'd understand how idiotic your statement looks.I am more consistent and I'm less prejudiced.
You object to people creating certain new definitions but gladly accept new definitions for things like apartheid when it can be used to demonize Israel.
Including the Arab Zionists? The ones who claim Israel as their historical birthright and therefore need to drive the Jewish infidels from their land. Arab Zionism is disgusting. They are the new Nazis who want to provide a final solution to the Jewish problem.Yes, zionists.
You are the 5 year old lying on the floor stomping their hands on the floor yelling, "genocide, apartheid, colonialism, etc." until you get your way.It makes you sound like 5 year old kid
S. Africa created their own definition without the help of even one other country. Their definition never applied to citizens of any other country.There was only ever one definition of apartheid. The one per international law.
So - they got the very short end of the stick. Various European diseases did an effective job of ethnic cleansing for the colonists, superior killing technologies did the rest. The land was a whole lot better off under the Hurons, who were unable to implement any kind of effective immigration policy. Imagine if all the treaties over the years had been between equal parties?Ontario was only 0% white and 100% Huron and Algonquin. So?
Nice.South Africa never created any definition of apartheid. The only ever official definition of apartheid, as a crime against humanity, was defined per international law.
I support a one state solution where Jews, Palestinians and people of other religions and tribes, live in a constitutional secular democratic republic.
Ridiculous. The policies that they entered into law created the definition. They set the parameters. Whatever ways they treated the blacks and browns differently, that was their policy and the named it apartheid. They created the term apartheid.South Africa never created any definition of apartheid. The only ever official definition of apartheid, as a crime against humanity, was defined per international law.
That is very honourable of you. Unfortunately it's not what Hamas supports. It wants to drive the Jews out of the land, take it for their own, have a non-secular state and they will use whatever means possible, including violence and genocide, to achieve their goals.I support a one state solution where Jews, Palestinians and people of other religions and tribes, live in a constitutional secular democratic republic.
More and more people see the one state solution with equal rights the only answer to the status quo, one state apartheid solution in place now.Nice.
No one in the ME supports that btw. But you do you.
Your ignorance is astounding.Ridiculous. The policies that they entered into law created the definition. They set the parameters. Whatever ways they treated the blacks and browns differently, that was their policy and the named it apartheid. They created the term apartheid.
Are you saying that the world was against and boycotted apartheid but they didn't know what it was?
Meanwhile Egypt has improved their border wall. I wonder what do they know that “more and more people” don’t?More and more people see the one state solution with equal rights the only answer to the status quo, one state apartheid solution in place now.
Not at all.Your ignorance is astounding.
Read the reports by Amnesty, HRW, B'tselem and the UN or just shut up.
Your ignorant views are just noise.
If you feel that the new parameters that the UN arbitrarily decided to include, are more important, fine, accept them but just give it a different name. IT IS NOT APARTHEID AS LAID OUT BY S. AFRICAN POLICIES. THEY MADE THE POLICIES AND THEY GAVE IT THE NAME. Deal with it.I think there is an exception for all chosen people, they can do no wrong and slaughtering lesser humans is part of their path of righteousness.
It was written into law. That was how they defined it, even if they didn't submit it to the Oxford dictionary. The world used those inscribed laws as the basis for imposing those sanctions. "We do not approve of this apartheid that you are practising. Get rid of it or else."South Africa, simply implemented policies for racial segregation and they never defined it.
So do all the Muslim extremist groups. Israel doesn't.South Africa, simply implemented policies for racial segregation and they never defined it. It is even more ridiculous to expect them to define something in such a negative fashion that they were pushing as morally correct. That is like expecting the Israelis or the Nazis to define their mass murders as "genocide".
There was no official definition of what constituted apartheid until 1973 when for the very first time, the UN International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid defined apartheid as: “inhuman acts committed for the purpose of establishing and maintaining domination by one racial group of persons over any other racial group of persons and systematically oppressing them". Of course, none of the white countries, signed and ratified it at the time, which is absolutely disgusting, but not surprising.
Eventually, the Rome Statue of the ICC, decided to define the crime of apartheid as a crime against humanity, in 1998, while adopting this one and only official definition of apartheid. It does not matter how many times you bob and weave around the issue, but there is only one definition of apartheid, and that is as per international law. And per that law, Israel is an apartheid, racist and genocidal ethno-state, that was illegitimately formed, illegally occupying Palestinian lands and is in violation of several international humanitarian laws, for which they are being rightly called out.
Palestinians are not Hamas. Hamas are Palestinians. So unconditionally cease fire. Take out Hamas leadership via covert ops. Work on a 2 state or a 1 state solution. A 1 state solution should be a secular, constitutional, democratic republic. A 2 state solution should involve going back to the 1948 or 1967 borders and removing ALL settlements in those freed up lands, and allowing FULL political, military, economic and moral sovereignty for the Palestinians.
No one in the middle east supports genocide either. Oh wait, I take that back. The Israeli Zionist Jews do.
"More and more people" = you and your buddies at the Feminist trans inclusive activists committee on Palestinian liberation and climate struggle.More and more people see the one state solution with equal rights the only answer to the status quo, one state apartheid solution in place now.
And you saying something is not to be taken seriously.Writing into law is not a definition.