Faced with two sources and direct quotes you still keep pretending that you are right.Sorry but you haven't responded to my points above, you are just a farting idiot with nothing to stay. Your post, a complete repetition of your previous post, without any indication that you even comprehended the reply, is just ignorant sputter. You don't win arguments by blindly repeating points that have been disputed, which is what you are doing. You are a hateful moron too stupid to figure out how to continue this discussion with facts and reasons.
Keep on hating Gryfin, nobody respects you.
The content you cannot reply to is in post #58 above you sputtering idiot.
and once again, this is from the source that you supplied as your supportUpon entering the Town Hall meeting, they declared their inability to endorse the proposed truce agreement and requested the evacuation of Haifa's Arab citizen's (which in any case had been ongoing under duress the whole day) because of Stockwell's refusal to protect their lives and properties.
Obviously you didn`t read the quote above.You plainly don`t understand what you are reading.
Obviously if
a) The Palestinians refused to sign a truce (because they wanted that jurisdiction clause), and
b) The British weren`t going to come running to help them
then clearly Haganah was going to execute a fully lawful attack on the militants garrisoning the town, in which attack the lives and properties of Palestinians would no doubt be put in danger, because that is more or less what happens when a city turns into a battlelfield--it becomes a dangerous place to be.
That, however, is not an ethnic cleansing unless you are so fucking stupid that you think any war in which civilians are hurt is an ethnic cleansing.
The key here is that they WERE willing to stay under a circumstance that they very clearly named.
They declared their inability to endorse the proposed truce agreement because of Stockwell`s refusal to protect their lives and properties.Upon entering the Town Hall meeting, they declared their inability to endorse the proposed truce agreement and requested the evacuation of Haifa`s Arab citizen`s (which in any case had been ongoing under duress the whole day) because of Stockwell`s refusal to protect their lives and properties.
Those were ordinary, uninvolved citizens who were killed in the market.The orders to the attacking units on 21 April were "to kill any Arab you encounter…set on fire all flammable objects…and force open doors with explosives". The Cormeli Brigade`s full force was unleashed on a civilian population of some 75,000 crowded into an area no more then 1.5 square kilometres. When the Haganah Command learned that the Arab authorities were calling upon the civilians to gather for shelter in the old market place, three-inch mortars, according to the official history of the Carmeli brigade, were ordered to shell the market place. "When the shelling began and shells fell inside the market a great panic ensued. The crowd broke into the port and pushing aside the police who guarded the gate it stormed the boats and began to flee the city."
The article makes clear that their reason for not signing the truce was the lack of the jurisdiction clause. They make clear in other statements that they want to leave voluntarily because the British won't protect them from the Haganah attack.They declared their inability to endorse the proposed truce agreement because of Stockwell's refusal to protect their lives and properties.
Go ahead, provide the full context and quotes that prove your point.The article makes clear that their reason for not signing the truce was the lack of the jurisdiction clause. They make clear in other statements that they want to leave voluntarily because the British won't protect them from the Haganah attack.
Re-read post #37. It's indisputable that the Arabs were intent on signing the truce if their jurisdiction clause had been added.Go ahead, provide the full context and quotes that prove your point.
You keep backing yourself into the same corner, lickspittle:Sorry but you haven't responded to my points above, you are just a farting idiot with nothing to stay. Your post, a complete repetition of your previous post, without any indication that you even comprehended the reply, is just ignorant sputter. You don't win arguments by blindly repeating points that have been disputed, which is what you are doing. You are a hateful moron too stupid to figure out how to continue this discussion with facts and reasons.
Keep on hating Gryfin, nobody respects you.
The content you cannot reply to is in post #58 above you sputtering idiot.
Actually, the post above yours obliterates your point. We have the Haganah confessions.Nope. See above.
Nope. As I pointed out there is no reason to think that Arabs leaving being caused by Haganah operations is anything other than Arabs refusing to live under Haganah jurisdiction.Actually, the post above yours obliterates your point. We have the Haganah confessions.
That's funny, I see 73% of departures directly caused by Israeli's. Another 22% departed as a result of fear. Only 5 % as a result of Arabs calls to leave.Nope. As I pointed out there is no reason to think that Arabs leaving being caused by Haganah operations is anything other than Arabs refusing to live under Haganah jurisdiction.
Your are assuming stuff not in the text.
The really sad part is the ethnic cleansing is continuing today with the eradication of the Beduin's traditional homes and lands.That's funny, I see 73% of departures directly caused by Israeli's. Another 22% departed as a result of fear. Only 5 % as a result of Arabs calls to leave.
Nowhere do I see Palestinians leaving simply because they refuse to live under Haganah jurisdiction - so who is assuming stuff not in the text?
Looks like case closed.
Lickspittle...stop painting yourself into a corner.It doesn't say that the Israelis evicted them or cleansed them. It says they left as a result of Israeli operations. That is pretty vague.
I would assume that means Israel captured the territory they lived in, and they decided they did not want to be part of Israel, so as a result of the operation they decided to leave.
That is exactly what happened in Haifa.
You certainly have no reason to make any other assumption. If you do not want to make any assumption you would say you do not know from that quote what about the Israeli action caused them to leave.
All sputter, no content.Nope. As I pointed out there is no reason to think that Arabs leaving being caused by Haganah operations is anything other than Arabs refusing to live under Haganah jurisdiction.
Your are assuming stuff not in the text.
Lets see what the Haganah confessed again:Is that your "strategy" now? Ignore what other people write, pretend you haven't been refuted, and mindlessly repaste debunked quotes over and over?
I guess your hate has led to a complete mental breakdown.
You have failed to respond to the points in post #58. But I guess you have nothing to lose by mindlessly repeating yourself after you have been debunked and refuted--you never had any credibility here anyway.
