Yeah, and it better be on an email witnessed by an agent of the court. You're definitely a chick with a chip on her shoulder.
Report: Five members of Canada’s 2018 WJC team told to surrender to London Police
- Thread starter bazokajoe
- Start date
What a stupid thing to say...sounds like you're getting frustrated of being outsmarted
For Christ's sake, the girl was nude. She already agreed to sleep with a few, gave blowjob to others. Do you think an idiot needs to go to jail because he put his bags on her face?? That's stupid, I agree. But that is not an assault.
She did not agree to sleep with anybody except the original guy...it is sexual assault, absolutely, you can't rub your dick and bag in another person's face because you want too...and, I'm not sure if convicted if any of them are going to jail.
You don't know that, her contradictions and behavior would suggest otherwise.
Pretty sure...evidence show's McLeod calling the players in the room for a 3-way without her knowledge.
Read this again...
The Law of Consent in Sexual Assault - LEAF
Canada has a broad definition of sexual assault. It includes all unwanted sexual activity, such as unwanted sexual grabbing, kissing, and fondling as well as rape. Sexual activity is only legal when both parties consent. Consent is defined in Canada’s Criminal Code in s. 273.1(1), as the...
www.leaf.ca
Doesn't mean she didn't consent.Pretty sure...evidence show's McLeod calling the players in the room for a 3-way without her knowledge.
Read this again...
The Law of Consent in Sexual Assault - LEAF
Canada has a broad definition of sexual assault. It includes all unwanted sexual activity, such as unwanted sexual grabbing, kissing, and fondling as well as rape. Sexual activity is only legal when both parties consent. Consent is defined in Canada’s Criminal Code in s. 273.1(1), as the...
Did she say NO?
Did she say she was forced to stay or that they convinced her to stay.
Odd behaviour for someone not up for it.
If you're gonna bring contradictions and behavior into this the players don't exactly come out looking great.
No, it's to consider the evidence equally the same.
Not point out all the contradictions on one side while ignoring all the contradictions and behaviour on the other side.
Not as bad as her, that's why you're so worried the players are going to walk.
Wrong on every point...
-no evidence she consented for every guy to do everything
-She doesn't have to say NO, the players had to ensure she said YES
-Yes, she did say she was convinced to stay, a couple times
-Odd behaviour for players...getting a blowjob with 10 people in the room, and 3 of them did it!
If she was crying it was likely after the deed was done and she had sobered up. Realizing what she had done. Including cheating on her then fiance.
Pretty sure...evidence show's McLeod calling the players in the room for a 3-way without her knowledge.
Read this again...
The Law of Consent in Sexual Assault - LEAF
Canada has a broad definition of sexual assault. It includes all unwanted sexual activity, such as unwanted sexual grabbing, kissing, and fondling as well as rape. Sexual activity is only legal when both parties consent. Consent is defined in Canada’s Criminal Code in s. 273.1(1), as the...
The Women's Legal Education & Action Fund defines sexual assault more 'broadly' than does the Criminal Code of Canada.
The defense doesn't need to prove she consented, the Crown has to prove that she didn't consent to the acts. Her testimony isn't enough.
The Crown should have never pursued this case given the evidence that they had.
You're assuming things that aren't facts.
Maybe she was crying because she wanted to leave and the players wanted her to continue
You made your mind up about this case even before she testified. You're a #metoo disciple.
