But you do follow ESPN romances involving Bryant and Tyson.Oh buzz off...I don't follow E-Hollywood romances...
But you do follow ESPN romances involving Bryant and Tyson.Oh buzz off...I don't follow E-Hollywood romances...
You came to a conclusion BEFORE there was any evidence, there's nothing worse than that.Listening to the evidence hasn't changed my mind, it's actually worse than I thought.
Ok, wrong on a few issues here...There's no crime in inviting friends over for some sex with some random bar fly, only if you proceed against her will.
No proof of that.
No proof that they forced her to stay.
Maybe that's why she never pressed charges, maybe that's why she texted her friend saying how her mom was making a big deal out of it, maybe that's why she initially said it was all her fault,
maybe that's why she refused a blood test for drugs
Why? I'm not on the jury...You came to a conclusion BEFORE there was any evidence, there's nothing worse than that.
Those weren't romances, they were crime stories.But you do follow ESPN romances involving Bryant and Tyson.
Says who? It happens all the time. It depends on the level of intoxication.You can't take advantage of drunk people
So was Amber Heard's accusations of her husband, and YOU called it a romance.Those weren't romances, they were crime stories.
No, but it does make you unreasonable and uncredible.Why? I'm not on the jury...
Ya, incidents like this happen every day? A drunken girl gets offered up for sex without her permission...if she was sober I bet she would have handled this differently.Says who? It happens all the time. It depends on the level of intoxication.
I seem unreasonable to you because I think you're wrong on every comment you makeNo, but it does make you unreasonable and uncredible.
What does that have to do with this? I told you I didn't follow it and you insinuated "sure I didn't"...again, buzz offSo was Amber Heard's accusations of her husband, and YOU called it a romance.
NO, I know you're unreasonable because you're willing lock people up without evidence, even in the face of evidence.I seem unreasonable to you because I think you're wrong on every comment you make
Same thing Tyson and Bryant have to do with it, which you brought up.What does that have to do with this?
You don't know any of that....if she was sober I bet she would have handled this differently.
Wrong again...if convicted I don't think they get jailNO, I know you're unreasonable because you're willing lock people up without evidence, even in the face of evidence.
Keep dancing.
Again...I don't know what Johnny Depp didSame thing Tyson and Bryant have to do with it, which you brought up.
Don't worry, you weren't on the jury.Again...I don't know what Johnny Depp did
So not being on the jury means I can't have an opinion?You don't know any of that.
Then again you're not on the jury.
Now you're just being a jerkDon't worry, you weren't on the jury.
I never said that, only that your opinion is worthless.So not being on the jury means I can't have an opinion?