Ashley Madison

Vance insults UK and French military - much anger happens

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
23,784
2,198
113
was he wrong? Americans are pissed. They have the biggest NATO contribution then the EU members of NATO promises the world to Zelensky and drag US with them...
Nooo it was the US that wanted this and dragged NATO poodles with them. The Euros were dumb and too weak to oppose Bidens war. And EVERYTHING the Biden admin predicted about the war was WRONG. They thought they could bring Russia to its knees and Russians would turn against Putin. If anything it really illustrates just how incompetent the Biden admin is and how shitty US Intel is. Trump is correct to completely raze the CIA and all the Intel agencies and the DOD as well.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,959
5,553
113
That's probably 39 operating tanks more than Russia at this point.
And they only have WWII style airplanes. I am surprised Latvia has not gone to Moscow yet.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
78,820
97,935
113
GlPH9O3XUAAbNEA.jpg

The Brit right wing tabloids now have a major war on JD Vance.

The one thing you never do in the UK is EVER insult the British army. It's like wiping your ass with the Bible in Texas.

These same newspapers were telling their readers how great Trump was a few days ago.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mitchell76

versitile1

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2013
3,445
1,512
113
 

boobtoucher

Well-known member
May 25, 2021
336
482
63
Amazing how susceptible people are to propaganda. I'm starting to think half of you are bots.

NATO and the UN were created by the US to protect US interests. What Trump is doing is kicking everyone out of HIS pool party because they didn't pay for the water.

The peace and prosperity afforded to the US, and the world, over the last 80 years is a result of global alliances, partnerships, and trade. Disrupting that makes the US worse off, full stop.

Finally, google shit. NATO has been working with Ukraine since 1991. NATO offered Ukraine membership in 2008. So for the entirety of Trumps first term, he didn't care that Ukraine was a NATO partner. What is the most likely reason he cares about it now? Does trump, who let millions of americans die of COVID, suddenly care about the lives of a few thousand Russians and Ukrainians? Cross-reference your answer with his cuts to USAID, which will lead to millions of unnecessary deaths.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
23,784
2,198
113
Germany, Britain and France have 2x Russia's population and 6 times Russia's GDP.

All they need to do is commit and Putin is toast.
It will take them years to rearm to fight Russia. And if they win they get nuked. 🤷‍♂️ RUssia has 2m troops, therefore to attack Russia you need 6m. You would need to recruit, train and arm these guys. That is a MASSIVE undertaking. Then you will need to stockpile mountains of ammo in places RUssia cannot attack it. As soon as the war starts, Russia will attack all NATO air bases with Oreshnik. They will start sinking Allied shipping destroy all European oil and gas production and pipelines. Russia has thousands of S400 SAMs whereas NATO has a handful of AD systems. Russia will also take out all internet and sat system. In the first 3 weeks about 100T of damage will be caused...without nukes.
 
Last edited:

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
23,784
2,198
113
Weird flex considering how Trump wears his suits.
Its more of a sack and tie then a suit. I dunno why those guys can't get suits with good materials. Perhaps they don't wanna look to sharp to annoy the MAGA crowd. Macron, (although I dislike him) wears the best suits of all the leaders.
 

boobtoucher

Well-known member
May 25, 2021
336
482
63
Its more of a sack and tie then a suit. I dunno why those guys can't get suits with good materials. Perhaps they don't wanna look to sharp to annoy the MAGA crowd. Macron, (although I dislike him) wears the best suits of all the leaders.
The man paints himself orange. His view of fashion is to cover up his slovenliness, not to look nice.

It will take them years to rearm to fight Russia. And if they win they get nuked. 🤷‍♂️ RUssia has 2m troops, therefore to attack Russia you need 6m. You would need to recruit, train and arm these guys. That is a MASSIVE undertaking. Then you will need to stockpile mountains of ammo in places RUssia cannot attack it. As soon as the war starts, Russia will attack all NATO air bases with Oreshnik. They will start sinking Allied shipping destroy all European oil and gas production and pipelines. Russia has thousands of S400 SAMs whereas NATO has a handful of AD systems. Russia will also take out all internet and sat system. In the first 3 weeks about 100T of damage will be caused...without nukes.
The point is not to fight Russia. The point is to push Russia out of Ukraine. If they happen to break russia's army in the process, so much the better.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
23,784
2,198
113
The man paints himself orange. Clearly his v


The point is not to fight Russia. The point is to push Russia out of Ukraine. If they happen to break russia's army in the process, so much the better.

That is the exact same task. You need to realize, with only a tiny % of its GDP Russia can keep Ukraine is ruins for decades. They can arm various factions and keep a civil war going forever. EVEN if they left. So forget it. They view this war as existential, does not matter what the West thinks. They offered options for Ukraine to remain intact ex-Crimea but those were broken by Ukraine. They refused to even speak to the eastern Rebel leaders. Now Z refused to negotiate with Russia. Ukrainians know how to go all in with a pair of 2's.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
23,784
2,198
113
The allied powers.
What does that have to do with anything at all in this thread?
75% of German army deaths were caused by the USSR. So imagine how many more of the other Allies would have had to die if the USSR did not inflict those losses on the Germans. Or even worse, if there was no eastern front. The USSR not fighting, getting defeated or not being so deadly on the battlefield would mean half the people in this forum might not exist. Think about that for a second. Maybe we would be typing in German!! But OTOH that would be FKKs in Toronto lol.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
4,543
4,421
113
75% of German army deaths were caused by the USSR. So imagine how many more of the other Allies would have had to die if the USSR did not inflict those losses on the Germans. Or even worse, if there was no eastern front. The USSR not fighting, getting defeated or not being so deadly on the battlefield would mean half the people in this forum might not exist. Think about that for a second. Maybe we would be typing in German!! But OTOH that would be FKKs in Toronto lol.
Why dont you start thanking Nazi Germany while you are at it, because had they not opened the eastern front by invading the USSR, the USSR wouldn't have entered the war and remained happy with occupied Poland that they acquired via collusion with the Nazis in the first place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
23,784
2,198
113
Why dont you start thanking Nazi Germany while you are at it, because had they not opened the eastern front by invading the USSR, the USSR wouldn't have entered the war and remained happy with occupied Poland that they acquired via collusion with the Nazis in the first place.
Well we can be grateful Hitler was an idiot. But ultimately he needed oil and Russia was the only place he could obtain it on the continent in volumes he needed. If the Russians did not fight with such determination, then they would have lost and the West would be left to deal with Germany, with unlimited resources.🤷‍♂️
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
4,543
4,421
113
Well we can be grateful Hitler was an idiot. But ultimately he needed oil and Russia was the only place he could obtain it on the continent in volumes he needed. If the Russians did not fight with such determination, then they would have lost and the West would be left to deal with Germany, with unlimited resources.🤷‍♂️
Yeah and had the Germans won it would have resulted in the same. Hypotheticals.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
23,784
2,198
113
Yeah and had the Germans won it would have resulted in the same. Hypotheticals.
What is not hypothetical is that the USSR played the largest role in defeating Germany. They also played a big role in liberating many colonized countries in case you are wondering why there is this DNA level hatred for them in the West.
 

Bucktee

Well-known member
Jan 26, 2024
1,330
1,761
113
View attachment 414592

The Brit right wing tabloids now have a major war on JD Vance.

The one thing you never do in the UK is EVER insult the British army. It's like wiping your ass with the Bible in Texas.

These same newspapers were telling their readers how great Trump was a few days ago.
They're called tabloid for a reason.

But they're just as good a source as CNN, I suppose.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
4,543
4,421
113
What is not hypothetical is that the USSR played the largest role in defeating Germany. They also played a big role in liberating many colonized countries in case you are wondering why there is this DNA level hatred for them in the West.
Not disputing that.
What is also not a hypothetical is that the Soviets were one of the most oppressive, authoritarian and brutal regimes that ever existed killing more of their people than the Nazis ever did.
This is why most Western nations hate them.
If you doubt that then ask the former SSRs why they hate the Russians.
Helping defeat the Nazis does not buy you license to be oppressive.
General Zhukhov's comments were therefore deflection and propaganda.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts