lol. The fact that LaStooge is replying only proves my original point even more.
Trump Bans Transgender Athletes from Women's Sports
- Thread starter onomatopoeia
- Start date
Not even.
Trans issues were determined to be a good wedge issue/moral panic to whip up, and since the "evil Trans in the bathroom" ploy didn't work well, they pivoted to "trans women in sports" because it has a superficial veneer of "fairness" and "protecting women" that sold better.
typical, the loonie left hurls an insult and runs away without providing a logical counter argument
keep running
Lol. Now I’m “the looney left”. As if I am an entire political spectrum. LaStooge strikes again!
Caring about women's sports isn't the issue.
I don't care about women's sports either. Watching women play sports is extremely boring and aggravating. Most women, especially the staunchly independent bossgirl liberal ones, don't care about women's sports for the same reasons.
The issue is women's independence and autonomy from misogynists that want to impose themselves onto women's sports.
I wish. But this is how they/them actually think.
It really depends on the sport. I'm not sure why you are making blanket statements.
It would probably behoove the crowd upset by Trump's action to start differentiating on the issue.
It's likely the IOC will move to ban athletes who have undergone make puberty from women's Olympic sports.
Some of this crowd is not strong in differentiating issues, so let me help you.
Your beef should be with the President getting involved with deciding this issue instead of athletic governing bodies. That would be a valid beef, but those here advocating for transgender athletes in women's sports are fighting and feigning for a losing cause. This even though a few progressive members have idealistic views of being part of a cause that will inevitably find change with social attitudes. You know that crowd. They aren't wrong. They're on the right side of history.)
It's likely the IOC will move to ban athletes who have undergone make puberty from women's Olympic sports.
Some of this crowd is not strong in differentiating issues, so let me help you.
Your beef should be with the President getting involved with deciding this issue instead of athletic governing bodies. That would be a valid beef, but those here advocating for transgender athletes in women's sports are fighting and feigning for a losing cause. This even though a few progressive members have idealistic views of being part of a cause that will inevitably find change with social attitudes. You know that crowd. They aren't wrong. They're on the right side of history.)
Last edited:
hey if the shoe fits, wear it Cinderella
this garbage is obviously not right oriented and certainly not centralist
do we need to define new political positioning in multiple dimensions now because the left are ashamed of their history of failure?
please provide clarity so i don't offend anyone unintentionally
Amazing this is the hill they choose to die on.
They need a new compass because they can't find the moral high ground anymore.
It's textbook crazy.
Yet you have no problem with others also making blanket statements in this thread because it fits your narrative. Typical rightie hypocrisy from the master of hypocrisy, WyattTwerp.
Now that there is an EO there is nothing to worry about...Glad you agree
The EO will be rescinded in the future and will be challenged in court and most likely get blocked just like the trans male prisoner EO got blocked.
It can also not be enforced at the local level.
But if the optics will get you to sit down, then great.
Scott Jennings is Right on the Money
Scott Jennings critiques the Democratic Party's handling of 80/20 issues, highlighting how they often side with the minority view, losing the public's suppor...
www.youtube.com
That is democracy.Scott Jennings is Right on the Money
Scott Jennings critiques the Democratic Party's handling of 80/20 issues, highlighting how they often side with the minority view, losing the public's suppor...
If the 80% want the 20% to be hurt in some way, democratic principles suggest you side with the 20%.
Otherwise it is majoritarianism.
I know MAGA aficionados don't like democracy.
