Congratulations on your 1-week anniversary of joining this board, Dave!!![]()
He will be rebranding within a week. Jimi to Jimiagain to Davenotthere to FILL IN THE BLANK >_____________ lmao
Congratulations on your 1-week anniversary of joining this board, Dave!!![]()
the game is not overThere is no bigger picture. He agreed to every term we said we would do two months late.
He folded.
Lets add it all up.You're walking blind without a cane mate.
Well, if I ever passed you by on the street, I would lift my leg and Pee Pee on you. I hope you will thank me for my gift since you do support Pee Pee.You're so cute. You remind me of a golden retriever.
What's the bigger picture?No I don't agree with that. Not at all. Its amazing how you can't see the bigger picture here.
He blinked, It's over. Anything other antics going forward, Canada and the rest of the world will be ready.the game is not over
It's always weird when someone tries to tell you what you are saying even after you clarified it. I've been saying the Canadian telecoms grew organically, but there is no foreign competition. How can I say it so you won't quibble with the words? Rogers, Bell and Telus are protected from foreign competition.What do you mean they did not develop organically?
You can explain the lack of foreign investment in Canadian telecom and banking anyway you want. Perhaps, it's just a market overlooked by larger American, European and Japanese telecoms and banks. Rather I think there are regulatory impediments that close access to the market. I wasn't the first one to point it out on this thread.Sounds like mental gymnastics to me frankly.
What are you talking about?He blinked, It's over. Anything other antics going forward, Canada and the rest of the world will be ready.
This was a severely stupid threat made. This isn't the 1950's anymore.
We should fucking cut their gas supply of just to show them we're not playing.
You're right. That was rich. But as I demonstrated earlier, all of you tDSers share common traits so I feel like it's all one guy. But I don't mind because all of these posts have such little logic and/or facts, it's not a problem.I never called you woke, that was another one of your fans. You're confused again. You get confused easily. Once again I suspect dementia. And again you failed to provide any example of my spelling mistakes but instead made a spelling mistake of your own. I would expect higher intelligence from a doctor but then again you're as much of a doctor as Dr. Dre.![]()
![]()
![]()
Not a serious answer. Something political. So you still have no examples of disagreeing with what he says.Ok just to appease your pathetic little self, I don't believe Trump when he said he didn't get peed on by Russian hookers. Feel better? Now provide any example(you can't) of my spelling mistakes? Do that and you'll be my 'favourite' leftie loser![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
it would be great if you were rightHe blinked, It's over. Anything other antics going forward, Canada and the rest of the world will be ready.
the threat is still thereThis was a severely stupid threat made. This isn't the 1950's anymore.
and what you expect would happen next ?We should fucking cut their gas supply of just to show them we're not playing.
How do you expect people to take your posts seriously? You dispute a spelling error by committing another one.I don't get pendanic spelling Nazi. Why does it bother you so much? Do you beat your kids if they spell something incorrectly?
You want to relive the same outcome all over again? Sure. Nothing changes.What are you talking about?
Even if this is over, 2026 starts the review process.
You sound like Tojo after Pearl Harbor.
Dave, you should congratulate mandrill on being a top poster on TERB. He and his former friend comfortably hold down the top two spots for posted messages. He always takes time out of his day to welcome the new members.Congratulations on your 1-week anniversary of joining this board, Dave!!![]()
Unlike you somebody showed some actual wittiness when they called me "shack of sit". That was a good one. Not juvenile.Shouldn't your name be shit shack? For obvious reasons.
Actually, it would be unfair to hold you to the same intellectual level, so I'll give you a pass.I answered your question with a question because I know you hate that.
Regulatory impediments exist in every country for various reasons.Rather I think there are regulatory impediments that close access to the market.
Factor | USA | Canada |
---|---|---|
Direct Foreign Ownership Cap | 20% (strict limit, no exceptions) for companies holding FCC licenses | 20% direct cap for large telecoms |
Indirect Foreign Ownership Cap | 25% (FCC can approve higher case-by-case) | 33.3% indirect cap for large telecoms (46.7% total limit) |
Approval for Exceeding Cap? | Direct ownership: No exceptions Indirect ownership: FCC can approve above 25% | No exemptions for large carriers Small carriers (<10% market share) have no limits |
Workarounds for Foreign Investors? | Use U.S. holding company to bypass 20% direct limit | Use indirect ownership, but strict total cap |
National Security Review? | CFIUS + Team Telecom (DOJ, DHS, DOD) | Investment Canada Act + CSIS/Public Safety Canada |
Foreign Ownership in Major Carriers? | Allowed with FCC approval (e.g., Deutsche Telekom owns 50%+ of T-Mobile US) | Not allowed for large carriers (Bell, Rogers, Telus all Canadian-owned) |
Foreign Investment in Spectrum? | Allowed with FCC approval | Requires CRTC & ISED approval (often restricted) |
Foreign Investment in Infrastructure? | Allowed with conditions | Highly restricted, especially in rural areas |
Government Justification? | National security & competition | National security, cultural protection, sovereignty |