Duh. Wouldn't that be, by definition, an ethnostate?
The Nazis wanted a state for Aryans. ISIS wants a Caliphate. I wouldn't support them either.
"Iran cannot have nukes" Trump warns
- Thread starter oil&gas
- Start date
The Nazis wanted a state for Aryans. ISIS wants a Caliphate. I wouldn't support them either.
LOL. Who cares. He has been discredited and marginalized.
I got banned for a month because of all of the over the top arguments I got into with him, but as he posted more and more, those arguments helped expose his lies and hypocrisy as he got routinely painted into corners by contradicting himself and was unable/unwilling to respond on so many occasions when I challenged him. The more he posted, the more he ruined his own reputation. Nowadays, people don't take his posts seriously. Instead they are simply mocked. That is why, since my return I do not engage him as I previously did. He's a shadow of his former self.
As well, he got banned for a month as did I and in that time the whole board could see how much more civil the Politics Forum was in his absence. For the most part, it is mission accomplished for me.
I didn't at all like getting banned, but there are some good things that came out of it.
Why are you so proud and anxious to expose your anti-Semitism?4,431 dead and 31,994 wounded ... So far.
Casualties of the Iraq War - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
This was my question.
Bush went in because of the belief of the existence of Saddam's WMDs.
Seriously, think before you post such BS.
Glad to see you are justifying Israel's response to Oct. 7
Their survival is under greater risk than that of Iran.
It could very well be an ethnostate, but it is not Zionism. Zionism refers specifically to one ethnicity. Jews. D'uh.
You intentionally co-opted the term "Zionism" to mean something that it isn't. Even if the concept is similar to another cencept, that does not make them the same. You are trying to use "Zionism" in a way that helps you demonize it. Sorry. That will not pass.
You are trying to tell us that rain is the same as snow because they are both precipitation. D'uh indeed.
You should stop because each time you respond, you are making yourself look sillier and sillier.
Last edited:
They only started developing nukes after Trump got in
It is expected Israel will respond to October 7.
Whether the response was justified or how much of it was justified is for the ICJ to rule on.
However, I do not agree that Israel was facing an existential threat on October 7.
It was a terrorist attack. Thats about it.
Israel has been under an existential threat since its' conception and until every one of its' neighbours acknowledges in writing that they they recognize Israel's right to exist.
Even still, Israel must prepare its' readiness to defend itself as if no such acknowledgements were ever made. That is Israel's lot. They can never let their guard down.
One lapse in readiness could mean their extinction. They actually got lucky with the failure of Oct. 7.
The ICJ, nor anyone else, is qualified to speak as to how much Israel values its' own existence.
I understand that. But you cannot use Zionism in the context of any other ethnicity than Jews and Israel. That is my point.
But the present US government is unhinged and follows no rational methods of diplomacy. The President today is an unhinged grifter who has only one burning desire... to be notorious ( whether for good or bad deeds, it doesn't matter and if it's bad, he just calls it good)
You know, if you wanted peace you could push for Israel to stop invading other countries and taking their land.
That makes Israel an existential threat to Palestine, Lebanon and Syria directly, and an existential threat to Egypt, Iran and Yemen indirectly.
Why won't you accept Palestine's right to exist?
The world does, why won't you?
Are you actually stooping to editing someone's post?
Is that how desperate you are?
I mean only trolls and cowards do that right?
And they do that because they really have no argument.
So?
