Trump on Joe Rogan
- Thread starter Butler1000
- Start date
Please point out any facts, NOT FICTION, that you have about John Kelly being a lobbyist or sitting on a board for the arms industry. Unless you can, then you are pretty much full of shit, right?
John F. Kelly - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
General John F. Kelly
General Kelly was born and raised in Boston, MA. He enlisted in the Marine Corps in 1970, and was discharged as a sergeant in 1972, after serving in an infantry company with the 2nd Marine Division,
www.defense.gov
Go ahead, show us, prove you don't just make shit up.
I disagree. They were plenty of votes to be mined in his audience. Lots of independent, 18-34 men who were voting for RFK, like Tulsi Gabbard, and could be swayed.
Ad with the margins in the swing states, changing 50,000 votes in Michigan or Penn with one podcast is a game changer. Especially this late.
Please point out any facts, NOT FICTION, that you have about John Kelly being a lobbyist or sitting on a board for the arms industry. Unless you can, then you are pretty much full of shit, right?
John F. Kelly - Wikipedia
General John F. Kelly
General Kelly was born and raised in Boston, MA. He enlisted in the Marine Corps in 1970, and was discharged as a sergeant in 1972, after serving in an infantry company with the 2nd Marine Division,www.defense.gov
Go ahead, show us, prove you don't just make shit up.
When 80 percent of US generals go to work for arms makers
The revolving door between the Defense Department and the weapons industry spins — a new report offers ways to slow it down.
responsiblestatecraft.org
80%
And your Wiki page lists Acuity international with him as a board member. Look at their link. I win.
You and I are in agreement. Not sure why you responded to my post specifically.
If you notice if you say anything that can be construed as even slightly critical of Harris, people feel compelled to immediately defend her or attack Trump. Some go to great lengths to try to take apart or contradict a basic observation. As I said before, with a week to go people are very sensitized.
Suggesting her campaign has not done a great job doesn't mean Trump has executed a great campaign. However, one will win and one will lose. The losing party will go into deep reflection.
Last edited:
effectively
Usage
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
adverb
- actually but not officially or explicitly.
"they were effectively controlled by the people they were supposed to be investigating"
Similar:
practically
virtually
in effect
Last edited:
Jill Stein is never going to win.
The Palestinian issue is not a big issue for Americans.
So any vote you give to other than Kamala, will help Trump win.
If Trump wins both Palestinians and Muslims are fucked.
You are, I think, understating the importance of Podcasts. I think they have a far wider audience, a younger demographic, and allow the opportunity to listen anywhere, anytime. There is also a perception of them being less partisan and more about getting the person to open up rather than canned answers.
This is the first year both candidates really used them, and moving forward I think some of them are going to become must do's. It will be interesting if any studies choose to try to see if they were effective.
It is an Issue for Arab-Americans. They feel they have nothing to lose. Right now the choice is, my family/friends are getting killed, or a travel ban. That's the ACTUAL COMPARISON IN POLICY.
You have other priorities. And vote accordingly. So do they. You have to earn votes, and are not entitled to all of them.
I don't think I am understating their importance. I listen to a few. I'm not a regular Rogan listener. If Rogan's guest is funny, interesting or I have a curiousity, I might check it out.
You might understand why I wouldn't mention which podcasts I listen to because that always starts off a round of shoot the messenger. One podcast I listen to often is balanced, but as you know if they aren't attacking Trump nonstop some will be upset with the format.
Their vote for Stein will adversely affect them and their families which is in contradiction to what they want.
Their reading of policy and their decision making is therefore ill informed.
It was the usual Rogan episode.
He is your friend and agrees with whatever you say and lets you speak.
In your opinion. In theirs right now family and friends are dead, displaced, maimed, and headed for more. A travel ban is inconvenient. Ten's of billions of their tax dollars to killing their own is a far more immediate and clear threat. Right now they consider this administration to be enabling the war. For a year. A war that could be ended by simply denying arms.
What could POSSIBLY happen vs WHAT IS AND HAS HAPPENED is clear. Add in her embracing the Cheney's that is a dog whistle that says under her it won't stop.
Questioning known lies isn't attacking its what reputable journalism is
All of those things will happen even more under Trump.
More Palestinians will die. More Muslims will suffer.
Added to that, there will be a travel ban
Trump is objectively worse for them just based on policy positions alone.
Joe Rogan Gives His Thoughts on How the Podcast Went With President Trump "He's got this ability to just keep going. This is what's crazy. The podcast was three hours long. The guy didn't pee before the podcast. He didn't pee after the podcast...He didn't drink anything during the podcast. He just sat here and we talked...We did three hours!"
