That's hate speech, you're back to slandering an entire people.
Israel at war
- Thread starter Butler1000
- Start date
But as we discussed the Palestinian label and identity predates the conflict, or even Israel's formation.
Simply that Palestinians would live on their own terms without Israeli control.
Not really.
Before the Brits took over in 1919, the Palestinians were just generic Arab underlings of the Ottoman Turks, just like the Syrian, Lebanese, Iraqi and Jordanian Arabs. It was the Brits who named and created Palestine - which then included Jordan. The Brits did that, just so they could draw a line on the map and separate British "Palestine" from French "Syria". Both were artificial concepts.
Not these people. Geno has no credibility and is TERB's ongoing joke. In just the last week, these people have spoken out, in some form, against Geno's lies, racism and hate speech:
Whynot888
Bucksnort
Leimonis
GerryB
Mitchell
Phil C. McNasty
Andreiboris
Mandrill
GoodboyT
SchlongConnery
NotADcotor
richaceg
Gameboy27
BasketcaseButler1000canada-man
wyzemc2
princekwekua
Uwauwa
Vinson
jSanchez
Conil
Me
He claims there's only 4 people against him. This is just from a few threads and only the last 7 days.
There are many more than just this list.
Geno's only reason for being here is to foment discord by spewing hate speech. He provides nothing of benefit to TERB.
They were called Mandatory Palestine as that label existed from ancient times. The label applied to all religions of people there including Jews. After 1948 it has applied only to Muslims and Christians. Even if you consider the origins of the identity to be 1964 when the PLO was formed, its still been 3 generations of people?
It was a name on a map in a textbook in the UK.
That's why the British used it. It had no reality for the inhabitants.
Most of those are you, Shazi. Your computer skills are pretty shitty.
7pm at the Israeli embassy tonight for a protest.
You gonna show up or are you scheduled to change your depends then?
Think you can get 35,000 from terb to show up?
As I said, even if that identity was conjured up only in 64', it is very real today. For any way forward, that is all that matters.
The people have been indigeneous for 1000s of years. You may say they have adopted a new identity only for 3 generations or argue that their identity is atleast as old as their ancestry. Does the distinction matter for the future when it is accepted by even the parties in conflict that the other identity exists?
The Palestine pound (Arabic: جُنَيْه فِلَسْطَينِيّ, junayh filastini; Hebrew: פוּנְט פַּלֶשְׂתִינָאִי (א״י), romanized: funt palestina'i (eretz-yisra'eli) or Hebrew: לירה (א״י), romanized: lira eretz-yisra'elit; Sign: £P[1][2][improper synthesis?]) was the currency of the British Mandate of Palestine from 1 November 1927 to 14 May 1948, and of the State of Israel between 15 May 1948 and 23 June 1952, when it was replaced with the Israeli pound.
Mandatory Palestine passports were travel documents issued by British authorities in Mandatory Palestine to residents between 1925 and 1948. The first brown-covered passport appeared around 1927, following the issue of the Palestinian Citizenship Order, 1925. From 1926 to 1935 alone approximately 70,000 of such travel documents were issued.[1]
| Mandatory Palestine passport |
|---|
 The front cover of a Mandatory Palestine passport |
Immaterial to the zionist declaration that they were going to colonize Palestine.
Your opinion is worthless.
Charges have been submitted to the ICC and ICJ over Israel's killing of between 100,000 to 300,000 Palestinians.
I apologize, I should have clarified. I personally consider the label to predate Israel's formation. But if you protest, I will agree, as I did with Leimonis, for the sake of our discussion that the identity was conceived with the formation of the PLO in 1964. I dont see either position as weakening the fact that today the Palestinian identity is very real.
