Israel at war

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

That sounds about right

A point to note, which you said in your prior post as well is that the Palestinian tag is for Jews, Christians and Muslims who lived in the region. But not for the Jewish immigrants from Europe. So if you were to accept a new Israeli identity, or apply the Palestinian identity to all Jews in present day Israel, then the issue with Palestinian identity being new does not arise.

 

[Leimonis]

A point to note, which you said in your prior post as well is that the Palestinian tag is for Jews, Christians and Muslims who lived in the region. But not for the Jewish immigrants from Europe. So if you were to accept a new Israeli identity, or apply the Palestinian identity to all Jews in present day Israel, then the issue with Palestinian identity being new does not arise.

I think on the grand scheme of things it don’t really matter at this point who is more indigenous and whose temples are more ancient.

Once again, you simply have millions of jews who don’t want to leave and millions of Palestinians and other various arabs who want them to be gone from the river to the sea.

All the talk about who came from Poland or who doesn’t have their own language or fairytales or culture is, if not hate speech, at least not helping bringing peace.

 

[danmand]

I think on the grand scheme of things it don’t really matter at this point who is more indigenous and whose temples are more ancient.

Once again, you simply have millions of jews who don’t want to leave and millions of Palestinians and other various arabs who want them to be gone from the river to the sea.

All the talk about who came from Poland or who doesn’t have their own language or fairytales or culture is, if not hate speech, at least not helping bringing peace.

Is it not equally fair to say that you simply have millions of Palestinians who don't want to leave, and millions of Israelis who want them to be gone from river to the sea.

 

[Leimonis]

Is it not equally fair to say that you simply have millions of Palestinians who don't want to leave, and millions of Israelis who want them to be gone from river to the sea.

Absolutely and manifestly wrong.
Israelis gave gaza back to Gazans almost 20 years ago. Israel forcefully removed their citizens from gaza at the time. Gazans could have built Singapore but they chose to build terror tunnels.

 

[Klatuu]

Absolutely and manifestly wrong.
Israelis gave gaza back to Gazans almost 20 years ago. Israel forcefully removed their citizens from gaza at the time. Gazans could have built Singapore but they chose to build terror tunnels.

Deflection. Poorly educated

 

[Klatuu]

That’s meaningless because it includes Jews and arabs and christians who lived in Levant.
The issue is when Palestinian arabs become different from other arabs?

Thick

 

[Frankfooter]

Who's here taking you seriously ? It's irrelevant what I post here - your opinion will never change
and I bet it was formed before Oct 7. According to you (and I took time to read on you posts from
the past) - Jewish people have no right to self determination, the land of Israel is not their ancestral
land and anything they do is criminal. That pretty much sums up your take.

Sure it was ancestral.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1843250461518057780

 

[Klatuu]

I think on the grand scheme of things it don’t really matter at this point who is more indigenous and whose temples are more ancient.

Once again, you simply have millions of jews who don’t want to leave and millions of Palestinians and other various arabs who want them to be gone from the river to the sea.

All the talk about who came from Poland or who doesn’t have their own language or fairytales or culture is, if not hate speech, at least not helping bringing peace.

Oatmeal’s response went way over your head. He provided some quality insights.

 

[Frankfooter]

Indeed, there are no hostages in Lebanon. Why would Israel attack Lebanon ? Quite a puzzling dilemma

Same reason.
You gonna declare its also ancestral land?

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1841771626519515520

 

[danmand]

Absolutely and manifestly wrong.
Israelis gave gaza back to Gazans almost 20 years ago. Israel forcefully removed their citizens from gaza at the time. Gazans could have built Singapore but they chose to build terror tunnels.

Well, the facts on the ground are that there is a genocidal ethnic cleansing going on in Gaza, and spreading to the West Bank and Lebanon.

 

[Frankfooter]

Was October 7 a thought crime?

Do the 233 settler terrorist attacks in 2023 before Oct 7 count?
Does the attack on Al Aqsa on Oct 6 count?

 

[shack]

Attempting to argue that all Jews are genocidal zionists is antisemitic hate speech.

You don't attempt it. You shout it down from the mountaintops..

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Absolutely and manifestly wrong.
Israelis gave gaza back to Gazans almost 20 years ago. Israel forcefully removed their citizens from gaza at the time. Gazans could have built Singapore but they chose to build terror tunnels.

Israel is still illegally occupying the west bank.

 

[Frankfooter]

You don't attempt it. You shout it down from the mountaintops..

Every accusation is a confession.

You've lost your people, you only speak for zionists.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1841550266874704090

 

[shack]

This is a conspiracy theory.

Based on what factual info to the contrary.

 

[Leimonis]

Israel is still illegally occupying the west bank.

Israel is not blameless. But its position is not anywhere near as radical as a call for wiping out israel “from the river to the sea”.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Based on what factual info to the contrary.

I think we discussed that in subsequent posts.

 

[danmand]

Absolutely and manifestly wrong.
Israelis gave gaza back to Gazans almost 20 years ago. Israel forcefully removed their citizens from gaza at the time. Gazans could have built Singapore but they chose to build terror tunnels.

And by the way, next you will claim that Canada gave the Millhaven Institution to the inmates.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Israel is not blameless. But its position is not anywhere near as radical as a call for wiping out israel “from the river to the sea”.

There are radical forces on both sides who use such language. Netanyahu's cabinet is made up some of those radicals on the Israeli side.

 

[shack]

See above. This article and its writer have no credibility. Its one guy maintaining a website with a few articles. None of the contributors are credentialed. Credentials are important.

So it should be easy to provide facts as how meritless the theory is.

All you've got is "shoot the messenger". Your debating skills are as weak as Geno's.