Even if they were, which I'm sure you'll provide evidence to, they are clearly unarmed in the photos. Is it legal to use detainees or POWs as human shields, or is that a war crime? Awaiting your answer.
Last edited:
Israeli terrorist attack on Lebanon kills 9, injures thousands
- Thread starter Frankfooter
- Start date
The answer was provided earlier, as I said.
Its right here, but I know you can't figure out links with your DOS system.
I'm not sure if your mind looks like this:
Or this:
I am sure some civilians have been killed which is very sad. That, however, happens routinely in most, if not all, armed conflicts.
The real question is: was there more civilians killed than was reasonable, all things considered? And for all we know, there was less.
The numbers have been reported as being 70% women and children for almost a year.
This was in Feb, you can't look at this photo and say Israel was only targeting militants.
As we'll find out at the ICC and ICJ eventually.
Killing is illegal but that's what happens in war.
It's much more acceptable for Israel to use a terrorist opponent than Hamas using their very own people who aren't even soldiers to save theirr cowardly skin. That's the type of sickness you support. They will sacrifice their own families. Human life means nothing to them.
You're the coward that can't even answer a simple question; is it legal to use unarmed detainees and/or POWs as human shields, or is it a war crime? I await your answer, SShazi.
First you need to answer a question I've asked multiple times prior to your query yet have received no reply.
Which country in the area does more to further American interests than Israel. Which country in the area is more like an American style democracy than Israel?
Back to you supporter of claiming that taking human hostages is not a war crime. You are in no position to infer that you are on some sort of a moral high ground.
You were shown pictures of your IDF heroes using human shields and all you could come up with was, but, but, but, Hamas! You can't even answer if you think it's legal or a war crime to use unarmed detainees/POWs as human shields. The world will be a better place when you and your antiquated views cease to exist, SShazi.
No. I came up with Hamas using Palestinians (their own people) as human shields is much different than Hamas terrorists being used as shields.
Do you consider those as being equivalent? Or are terrorist lives more important than civilian?
ISIS has done more than Israel, Shazi.
All Israel has done is destroy the US cred, waste billions funding genocide and put the government at risk of war crime charges.
Can’t follow your own bouncing ball. Worried about your cognitive decline.
Last edited:
Ah, Shazi logic.
You don't accept the legal definition of human shields, like this example.
Only this way.
I see that after a year of killing , you still are in denial regarding the genocide. Netanyahoo is your hero..... sad.
So no proof they were terrorists. The world will be a much better place without you or your ancient, obsolete ideas. Thanks for confirming that, SSnazi, oh I mean SShazi.
