should trump drop out after the NABJ interview

[Skoob]

Trump charged Carroll with slander for calling him a rapist.
The ruling from that court case was on the specific issue of whether its slander or legally correct to say rump is a rapist.
It was not 'after the fact', as you well know.

Which still leaves you as a fascist who defends rape and felons.

Which still leaves you as a Marxist misinformation spreader.

Just because you keep peddling your biased narrative, doesn't mean it's tru/


As Notre Dame Law School professor Jay Tidmarsh, an expert in complex civil litigation and civil procedure, told Newsweek, "civil cases do not speak of 'guilt' or 'innocence'" but instead "use the language 'liable' or 'not liable,'" as reporting of the jury's verdict repeated.
"So it is accurate to say that Donald Trump was liable for battery and defamation, but not that he was found guilty of battery and defamation."

"Therefore, in order for Ms. Carroll to prevail on the statute of limitations, she needed to prove [by a preponderance of the evidence] that she was the victim of rape or sexual abuse or forcible touching.

"Any one of the three would have sufficed. The jury found two of the three applied, but not rape."

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-was-donald-trump-found-guilty-rape-1799935



Mother Jones? A publication that is anti-Trump and you use that as your source of non-partisan facts? That's funny. Lol!

 

[Skoob]

How's that working for you?

How's what working for me Mr. Riddles?

 

[Frankfooter]

Which still leaves you as a Marxist misinformation spreader.

Just because you keep peddling your biased narrative, doesn't mean it's tru/


As Notre Dame Law School professor Jay Tidmarsh, an expert in complex civil litigation and civil procedure, told Newsweek, "civil cases do not speak of 'guilt' or 'innocence'" but instead "use the language 'liable' or 'not liable,'" as reporting of the jury's verdict repeated.
"So it is accurate to say that Donald Trump was liable for battery and defamation, but not that he was found guilty of battery and defamation."

"Therefore, in order for Ms. Carroll to prevail on the statute of limitations, she needed to prove [by a preponderance of the evidence] that she was the victim of rape or sexual abuse or forcible touching.

"Any one of the three would have sufficed. The jury found two of the three applied, but not rape."

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-was-donald-trump-found-guilty-rape-1799935



Mother Jones? A publication that is anti-Trump and you use that as your source of non-partisan facts? That's funny. Lol!

Mother Jones reported the judge's ruling, skoob.
Deal with it.

You're a fascist defending rape, felony, apartheid and genocide.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1801963426870165819

 

[Insidious Von]

If The King of Kings wants to become American Caesar he's going to need to up his game. JD Vance isn't helping him.

Although this is consistent with the GOP platform. They have nothing to offer Americans except for hate.

 

[Skoob]

Mother Jones reported the judge's ruling, skoob.
Deal with it.

You're a fascist defending rape, felony, apartheid and genocide.

Mother Jones is a biased rag.

You're a Marxist homophobe supporting terrorists and being racist to foreign students by accusing them of being part of organized crime with zero proof.
All wrapped in a conspiracy-theory misinformation spreading gift wrap.

 

[The Oracle]

Yes her black Jamaican father would be very disappointed in her.
Same with her HBCU (black) college from which she graduated..

I've seen where her father claims to be mixed Irish and Hindu. His Irish ancestors owned slaves in Jamaica.

 

[Frankfooter]

Mother Jones is a biased rag.

You're a Marxist homophobe supporting terrorists and being racist to foreign students by accusing them of being part of organized crime with zero proof.
All wrapped in a conspiracy-theory misinformation spreading gift wrap.

They reported the judge's ruling, skoob.
Deal with it.

You get whiny when you're called out.

Now you've got the UK, where all the policies you back in place, taking part in the kind of race riots you seem to be arguing for here.
While rump and you are doubling down in your own racism.

Mixed-race voters say Donald Trump’s attacks on Kamala Harris’ race are painfully familiar

Trump questioned Harris’ heritage and accused her of using Blackness for political gain last week, prompting criticism, even from those who aren’t enthusiastic about Harris.

www.yahoo.com

Bombshell poll reveals huge shift in race between Kamala and Trump

There has been a major shift in the presidential race with President Biden's exit and Kamala Harris becoming the Democratic presidential nominee set to take on Donald Trump.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[wigglee]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818791022282838021

Now you're going after the journalist.... I thought you'd be against cancel culture, but I guess I was wrong.

 

[NotADcotor]

Mother Jones is a biased rag.

You're a Marxist homophobe supporting terrorists and being racist to foreign students by accusing them of being part of organized crime with zero proof.
All wrapped in a conspiracy-theory misinformation spreading gift wrap.

Hey hey, you forgot that he also supports rape, felony, apartheid and genocide. Don't remember his supporting felony but based on track record if it's committed against a Jew or in favor of committing rape, apartheid and genocide against Jews I am sure he would be down. I mean he just LOVES rape apartheid and genocide as long as it's in his hate monger eyes the right people. River to Sea, words have meaning.

 

[Frankfooter]

Hey hey, you forgot that he also supports rape, felony, apartheid and genocide. Don't remember his supporting felony but based on track record if it's committed against a Jew or in favor of committing rape, apartheid and genocide against Jews I am sure he would be down. I mean he just LOVES rape apartheid and genocide as long as it's in his hate monger eyes the right people. River to Sea, words have meaning.

Drunk posting just looks so bad the next day.

 

[Skoob]

They reported the judge's ruling, skoob.
Deal with it.

You get whiny when you're called out.

Now you've got the UK, where all the policies you back in place, taking part in the kind of race riots you seem to be arguing for here.
While rump and you are doubling down in your own racism.

Trump was never charged with rape. You are desperate.

The last person who should be accusing others of being racists is you.

 

[silentkisser]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818720069381402684

It came out that the hold up was because Trump didn't want to go out there if they were going to fact check him. So, he lied about an audio issue (which there was a minor one that was fixed in a few minutes), and sulked for like 27 minutes before he went out there...

 

[silentkisser]

@squeezer .....LMAO

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818727737479028919

This idiot thinks journalists are licensed??? It should also be pointed out, which Fox does all the time, is that she's on an opinion show.

 

[silentkisser]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818718503891046606

WATCH: While speaking at the National association of Black Journalists convention in Chicago just now, President Trump called out Kamala Harris
@KamalaHarris
for lying about being black: “She happened to turn Black... She was Indian all the way and all of a sudden she made a turn and she became a Black woman”, Trump said. Just like I have been telling all of you! President Trump even shared the same image I posted on X!

Dude, you really need to lay off the Loomer stuff. i mean, we all know you're a troll, but you don't need to show us you're a mental midget as well.

And....I wonder if Laura Loomer realizes that Kamala Harris didn't write the headlines.....

 

[silentkisser]

Mother Jones is a biased rag.

You're a Marxist homophobe supporting terrorists and being racist to foreign students by accusing them of being part of organized crime with zero proof.
All wrapped in a conspiracy-theory misinformation spreading gift wrap.

Yet you say nothing when @mitchell76 posts crap from the Daily Caller or News Max. In fact, I'm sure you've probably liked some of those posts.

 

[Skoob]

Yet you say nothing when @mitchell76 posts crap from the Daily Caller or News Max. In fact, I'm sure you've probably liked some of those posts.

I have indeed liked some of Mitch's posts as have many on here. He shares posts by several sources.

But for the other poster in question, you are rushing to the defense of someone who was caught, and admitted to posting false information to backup his arguments as early as a week ago. Not just passing along info, but using it to spread a false narrative. He was called out and said he was wrong. Kudos for admitting that, but it happens all the time. One grows weary pointing it out constantly.

That's the difference.

 

[silentkisser]

I have indeed liked some of Mitch's posts as have many on here. He shares posts by several sources.

But for the other poster in question, you are rushing to the defense of someone who was caught, and admitted to posting false information to backup his arguments as early as a week ago. Not just passing along info, but using it to spread a false narrative. He was called out and said he was wrong. Kudos for admitting that, but it happens all the time. One grows weary pointing it out constantly.

That's the difference.

But...and here is the important point...How many of Mitch's posts come from centrist sources? How many of them are just angry idiots like Laura Loomer screaming into the void? Trying to generate outrage and ire to profit off of views? That isn't the comeback that you think it is. Now, Mitch doesn't write out bullshit, he just posts it. Stuff that is verifiably false and/or twisted. It is heavy on opinion (usually wrong), and light on facts.

 

[Skoob]

But...and here is the important point...How many of Mitch's posts come from centrist sources? How many of them are just angry idiots like Laura Loomer screaming into the void? Trying to generate outrage and ire to profit off of views? That isn't the comeback that you think it is. Now, Mitch doesn't write out bullshit, he just posts it. Stuff that is verifiably false and/or twisted. It is heavy on opinion (usually wrong), and light on facts.

Simply sharing something from sources is different than sharing something from sources to add to your argument and being proven wrong due to fake info.

For example, if you just share a post you found that is funny, fake, satirical, interesting, etc that's fine. You are simply resharing what was already shared.

But if we're debating a topic, and then you add a post to backup your narrative which is then proven to be fake, that's different...it's deceptive.

Just like someone saying they are not homophobic, then using posts from known homophobes to back up their argument. That's more hypocritical than sharing fake info.

 

[Frankfooter]

Trump was never charged with rape. You are desperate.

The last person who should be accusing others of being racists is you.

The judge says he committed rape.
So why do you back rapists?

 

[Frankfooter]

Simply sharing something from sources is different than sharing something from sources to add to your argument and being proven wrong due to fake info.

For example, if you just share a post you found that is funny, fake, satirical, interesting, etc that's fine. You are simply resharing what was already shared.

But if we're debating a topic, and then you add a post to backup your narrative which is then proven to be fake, that's different...it's deceptive.

Just like someone saying they are not homophobic, then using posts from known homophobes to back up their argument. That's more hypocritical than sharing fake info.

Is that like supporting a rapist or felon?
Why do you think that's not hypocritical?
How about posts supporting apartheid or genocide?