should trump drop out after the NABJ interview

[richaceg]

When a judge says rump raped Carroll and has to pay $85 million for slandering his rape victim you just cheer it on.
You really do love rapists, don't you?
Why do you want a rapist to lead the country?
Do you think he's going to change the laws to let you rape too?

for injuries and pain inflicted....Donnie got a little too rough with E. Jean....E. Jean forgot the safe word...Rape without jail time? probably not rape then... you want documentation from the verdict that it wasn't rape? I can give you that if you want...
Meanwhile...
Kamala tells Pro-Palestinian protesters to pound sand...which I mean...I can't blame her for hijacking her rally.

 

[Skoob]

When a judge says rump raped Carroll and has to pay $85 million for slandering his rape victim you just cheer it on.
You really do love rapists, don't you?
Why do you want a rapist to lead the country?
Do you think he's going to change the laws to let you rape too?

Never convicted of rape despite your fantasy thoughts.

Coming from someone who supports homophobes and terrorists you should be the last person attacking others.

 

[dirtydaveiii]

The worst was when he mocked an handicapped journalist. There he showed us how low he can go. And his crowd of monkey found it funny...

I would say the worst is when he insulted decorated war hero John McCain and called the military suckers and losers. What's even worse is the cuckolded republican party still stood behind him

 

[dirtydaveiii]

The better question is why are the libs on here now supporting her when they didn't want her to run after Biden "stepped aside" and preferred other candidates?
I guess they have no choice.

The better question even yet is why would any Canadian want to see Trump get back in when there is no question he will hurt our economy with more illegal trade wars?

 

[Valcazar]

A judge ruled that rump raped Carroll and another judge ruled that it is legally correct to say rump is a rapist.

I don't believe that is correct.

A jury found that the evidence showed Trump sexually assaulted Carroll and penetrated her.
They also found that they could not conclude he used his penis.

No judge "ruled" there. In fact, even in a criminal case, it wouldn't be the judge ruling.

That same judge did find that the jury's conclusion means you can't sue someone for defamation for calling Trump a rapist, since he only isn't one according to the strict definition of "rape" in New York State Law as it applied at the time.
The conduct he was found to have done qualifies as "rape" in common parlance and in numerous jurisdictions.
In fact, it would qualify as "rape" in New York State next month.

 

[Valcazar]

Yes. Excellent.
That is the trial the judge was referring to.
That decision is what makes it that you can't defame Trump by calling him a rapist, since that jury verdict supports it.

 

[richaceg]

Yes. Excellent.
That is the trial the judge was referring to.
That decision is what makes it that you can't defame Trump by calling him a rapist, since that jury verdict supports it.

document that says...he didn't rape...clear as day...this was rough sex gone wrong....e jean is happy with her $$$ lets put it that way.

 

[Valcazar]

document that says...he didn't rape...clear as day...this was rough sex gone wrong....e jean is happy with her $$$ lets put it that way.

That document is the verdict from the assault trial.
That they found him guilty on count 2 is why you can call him a rapist.

Did you even read the judge's decision I posted?

Unless you are saying you believe the New York Penal code definition of rape is the valid and correct one and would also object to anyone else being called a rapist who doesn't fulfill that exact definition?

Then, while I think that's a terrible definition, at least you would be consistent.

 

[richaceg]

That document is the verdict from the assault trial.
That they found him guilty on count 2 is why you can call him a rapist.

Did you even read the judge's decision I posted?

Unless you are saying you believe the New York Penal code definition of rape is the valid and correct one and would also object to anyone else being called a rapist who doesn't fulfill that exact definition?

Then, while I think that's a terrible definition, at least you would be consistent.

was he convicted of rape?

 

[Valcazar]

was he convicted of rape?

No.
Because what he didn't fit the definition of rape under New York Law when he did it.
Unless you are holding on to the deeply silly and nonsensical belief that the only way anyone can be described as a rapist is whether or not he was convicted of such in a criminal trial, that's irrelevant.

More importantly to the discussion of whether or not it is appropriate to describe Trump as a rapist is what the assault trial found he did.
So again, good on you for posting the document that supports calling him a rapist.

 

[squeezer]

document that says...he didn't rape...clear as day...this was rough sex gone wrong....e jean is happy with her $$$ lets put it that way.

Serious question,

would you let Trump put his little finger from one of his little hands in your ass in a change room for that kind of $$$$$$$$$$

 

[richaceg]

Serious question,

would you let Trump put his little finger from one of his little hands in your ass in a change room for that kind of $$$$$$$$$$

I dont kiss and tell....

 

[richaceg]

No.
Because what he didn't fit the definition of rape under New York Law when he did it.
Unless you are holding on to the deeply silly and nonsensical belief that the only way anyone can be described as a rapist is whether or not he was convicted of such in a criminal trial, that's irrelevant.

More importantly to the discussion of whether or not it is appropriate to describe Trump as a rapist is what the assault trial found he did.
So again, good on you for posting the document that supports calling him a rapist.

We can keep grasping at a single straw...you on the other side....like you said... he wasn't convicted...you can call him a rapist..hiding behind the keyboard... I got my answer....it was NO..

 

[Valcazar]

We can keep grasping at a single straw...you on the other side....like you said... he wasn't convicted...you can call him a rapist..hiding behind the keyboard... I got my answer....it was NO..

So you realize how seriously weird and weak your position is in terms of normal humans with normal human language.

Got it.

 

[Frankfooter]

for injuries and pain inflicted....Donnie got a little too rough with E. Jean....E. Jean forgot the safe word...Rape without jail time? probably not rape then... you want documentation from the verdict that it wasn't rape? I can give you that if you want...
Meanwhile...
Kamala tells Pro-Palestinian protesters to pound sand...which I mean...I can't blame her for hijacking her rally.

$85 million?
The judge said rape.

 

[richaceg]

$85 million?
The judge said rape.

Jury of his peers said no.

 

[Skoob]

The better question even yet is why would any Canadian want to see Trump get back in when there is no question he will hurt our economy with more illegal trade wars?

No question? Meaning you have verified information and proof about that?

Or is this just more doom & gloom prophecy as usual?

 

[Frankfooter]

Jury of his peers said no.

You run with that.
How many women do you think will vote for a rapist?

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654544896802406402

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1808620629635313813

 

[richaceg]

You run with that.
How many women do you think will vote for a rapist?

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1654544896802406402

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1808620629635313813

Let me guess.. you think zero?

 

[Frankfooter]

Let me guess.. you think zero?

How many of these women do you think there are?

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1818363482410258927