No.
Because what he didn't fit the definition of rape under New York Law when he did it.
Unless you are holding on to the deeply silly and nonsensical belief that the only way anyone can be described as a rapist is whether or not he was convicted of such in a criminal trial, that's irrelevant.
More importantly to the discussion of whether or not it is appropriate to describe Trump as a rapist is what the assault trial found he did.
So again, good on you for posting the document that supports calling him a rapist.