Because no one was able to verify anything about it when it all came out in 2016 and there are lots of reasons to suspect it is false.
Unless new information about it comes out, no one is going to cover it.
should trump drop out after the NABJ interview
- Thread starter Frankfooter
- Start date
Unless new information about it comes out, no one is going to cover it.
She says she retracted the charges after death threats.
Given all that has been revealed about Epstein it doesn't seem that far fetched.
What information do you think made it look false?
Or at least after the pussy grabbing comments. That he did not (and won't now) is an enduring stain on American politics...
Hopefully the GOP doesn't panic and remove him.
He's done.
I'm getting fed up with heretics slagging The King of Kings. How many deserts must The Messiah walk through before The Football is rightfully returned to him. Let no unbeliever take it from him. Should that happen it will be The End of Days!
A megalomaniac with creeping dementia, what could go wrong?
A megalomaniac with creeping dementia, what could go wrong?
You won’t understand that, he himself was convicted of false charges as a result of political witch hunt. Can’t blame him for being sceptical
lol, piggy backing on pop star concerts to show Kamala can pull large Trump like crowds at rallies only goes to show that Democrats have already found a way to cheat and ruin this election. Now they are just doing everything to make it look believable.
Btw, why can’t Kamala do so that she is promising now while she is in power.
Trump is a clown but I will give him credit and predict he wouldn't touch her pussy! He does seem to have good taste in women usually. He's been a power pooner his entire life. I don't know why on earth he wanted to be Prez and under the spotlight instead of enjoying his remaining years banging hotties into the sunset.
He's the worst pooner on the planet.
He got caught hanging with the pedo rapist Epstein.
Raping Carroll in a change room in a department store.
Caught on tape with the 'pussy grabbing' quote.
Twice with $140k payouts to women he screwed.
Getting caught trying to declare a payoff as an election expense.
Oh god, it was years ago.
I remember no reporters being able to follow up on it.
The one or two that actually talked to her came back thinking she may not really exist.
The details in the filings don't match the descriptions of Epstein's behavior that came out from the various investigations that did go forward, etc.
But that's not even the point.
You asked why people aren't covering it.
They covered it when she filed the three lawsuits and withdrew each of them.
They covered it when she called a press conference then didn't show up.
And since then, she has done nothing.
There has been nothing new since 2016.
Like I said, people aren't going to report on it unless some new information comes out.
If it does, and people have some new lead to pursue or information to verify, someone will probably report on and investigate that.
But outside of a coordinated propaganda effort, the news isn't going to just keep bringing up something from 8 years ago that didn't go anywhere.
Except that there was also less evidence of the Epstein/Maxwell crimes back then.
Now the Epstein court docs are out, Epstein 'killed himself' and the other cases against rump bolster her initial claims and claim that she was threatened with death.
But there is nothing new.
Her case gets brought up (usually on social media) every time there is a new revelation about Epstein or his case.
And no factual details about it have changed and nothing new has been unearthed.
With nothing further there, nothing further gets reported.
Epstein has been a huge story for 5 years now.
Someone breaking new ground on this as true would be famous and win all the prizes.
But the very simple answer to your question remains simple.
Until someone finds something new about that case, the media won't be talking about it.
The Epstein story getting buried is the same story about the charges getting dropped and his suicide in prison.
That is the story.
What is the story?
Just endlessly repeating the word Epstein?
Endlessly repeating these particular accusations?
Yes, constant repetition by the press of something with no new information is effective propaganda.
But what is it you want other than "Why isn't the press conducting a propaganda campaign against Trump"?
Yes, this tape has been out for 8 years.
The one reporter who was allowed to interview her came away thinking she couldn't tell if the person she interviewed was the person actually making the rape accusation or whether that person even existed.
I'm still not sure what you want here.
What you would hope is that after the Jan court docs from Epstein there would be more press, more interview questions and more investigations.
This story should have had the traction of the Hunter story.
At least you are admitting this is just a complaint about propaganda with that comparison.
The difference is that the Hunter story (of late) had an actual court case attached, with things going on with that case.
This woman's story stopped having that in 2016.
