Israel at war

[Kautilya]

This post does nothing to prove your assertion that Israel will keep bombing Gaza after the war or a ceasefire until not a person is left. Where is your proof?

Here is my proof.

Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant says goal of Israeli offensive is the ‘elimination’ of Gaza.

www.youtube.com

Yaov Gallant:"Gaza wont return to what it was before. We will eliminate everything"

Case closed.

The old, multiple times failed IRRELEVANT argument. You pull it out any time you are cornered in a debate.

So you are saying the Christian inquisition is relevant to the current war in Gaza. This has to be interesting. Explain how? I'll wait for the pretzeled word salad next.

How do past acts justify the killing of 1,200 innocent civilians on Ocr.7?

What did you expect would happen based on Israel's past actions towards the Palestinians?

You've made this argument of yours irrelevant by invoking the argument in the quote above that.

That is an outright lie. The "past acts" in my post is clearly referring to Christian inquisition etc which I have pronounced as irrelevant, which it is, because they are unrelated events. You even quoted my post about that above.

But playing your game and going by this argument that you have just introduced, that any event, even if it is directly related is irrelevant, you would also be saying that October 7 is irrelevant to the current war in Gaza, which would make it unequivocally genocide. So you are basically admitting to genocide. Which is what we have all been saying anyway.

See? How you have pretzeled yourself yet again, for the 1,354,767th time?

Wait he claims to be an expert in logic. He has ZERO education on the topic yet is still an expert.

Don't let him drag you down to his level of intellect and then beat you with his experience there.

You claimed to be the expert in logic based on your education in logic at the UofT, while displaying none of it, if I may add. So that is an outright lie once again.

But yes buddy around with someone who posted in support of NAZISM in this very thread. You seem desperate.

 

[shack]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1798796951955313013

Where is that pic from? It can't be Gaza because every hospital there has been destroyed by Israel.

Yet another example of lying by the Hamas supporters.

 

[Kautilya]

Where is that pic from? It can't be Gaza because every hospital there has been destroyed by Israel.

How do you know that is a hospital? Talking out of your ass as usual.

 

[shack]

Here is my proof.
Yaov Gallant:"Gaza wont return to what it was before. We will eliminate everything" Case closed.
"He said that Gaza will never return to what it was before." And that is a terrorist state because it is run by the Hamas terrorists. Gaza will never return as a terrorist state. Where did he say that they will kill every single person? There never was a case and there still isn't.

But playing your game and going by this argument that you have just introduced, that any event, even if it is directly related is irrelevant, you would also be saying that October 7 is irrelevant to the current war in Gaza, which would make it unequivocally genocide. So you are basically admitting to genocide. Which is what we have all been saying anyway.

I see. So you are the TERB arbitrator of what is and isn't relevant. Who appointed you? You are the one who openly admitted that you are biased against Israel. You've disqualified yourself from any objective discussion.

The point is that every time you are painted into a corner, you claim irrelevance. You used it so often and in so many clearly improper ways that you are like to boy who cried wolf. Your words on irrelevance carry no weight.

 

[Kautilya]

He said that Gaza will never return to what it was before." And that is a terrorist state because it is run by the Hamas terrorists. Gaza will never return as a terrorist state. Where did he say that they will kill every single person? There never was a case and there still isn't.

No he said we will eliminate everything. Those were his words and those were his only words on that. Eliminate everything means, kill everything and make zero. Case closed.

I see. So you are the TERB arbitrator of what is and isn't relevant. Who appointed you? You are the one who openly admitted that you are biased against Israel. You've disqualified yourself from any objective discussion.

The point is that every time you are painted into a corner, you claim irrelevance. You used it so often and in so many clearly improper ways that you are like to boy who cried wolf. Your words on irrelevance carry no weight.

So explain how the Christian inquisition is relevant to the current war in Gaza. You said it was relevant, so you explain how it is relevant.

While saying this you also inadvertently introduced an argument, that past events even if directly related, are irrelevant. That wasn't my statement or declaration. It was yours. So going by your argument, you are admitting that the current war in Gaza has nothing to do with October 7, and amounts to genocide. That is a reasonable conclusion to make from your own statements.

You pretzeled yourself as usual.

 

[shack]

How do you know that is a hospital? Talking out of your ass as usual.

What is it. An opera house? Clearly it's a hospital. You're talking out of your biasses

 

[shack]

No he said we will eliminate everything. Those were his words and those were his only words on that. Eliminate everything means, kill everything and make zero. Case closed.

How wrong can you be. He said much more, including:

His very first words in that clip were, "Gaza won't return to what is was before." Where did he specifically use the words "there will not be a single life remaining" as you claim?

Your only case is a suitcase. Start packing.

 

[Kautilya]

How wrong can you be. He said much more, including:

His very first words in that clip were, "Gaza won't return to what is was before." Where did he specifically use the words "there will not be a single life remaining" as you claim?

Your only case is a suitcase. Start packing.

No. He said and I quote:"Gaza wont return to what it was before. We will eliminate everything". He did not qualify, he made a blanket statement that Israel will eliminate everything. Everything includes, humans, animals, homes, hospitals, places of worship, schools, you name it. As I said, case closed.

What is it. An opera house? Clearly it's a hospital. You're talking out of your biasses

That is a hallway of a building. There is no equipment or personnel to indicate that it is a hospital.

 

[shack]

The inferiority complex of Ziontologists knows no bottom.

You are incapable of telling us what a "Ziontologist" is.

Is it someone who hates Jews but studies how to pretend that it's about Zionism.

Please provide an alternate definition but if you can't it means that you accept my definition.

Refusing to reply means that you are ceding the narrative. What is a Ziontologist according to a one-celled Jew hater.

 

[The Oracle]

No. He said and I quote:"Gaza wont return to what it was before. We will eliminate everything". He did not qualify, he made a blanket statement that Israel will eliminate everything. Everything includes, humans, animals, homes, hospitals, places of worship, schools, you name it. As I said, case closed.
That is a hallway of a building. There is no equipment or personnel to indicate that it is a hospital.

"Gaza won't return to what it was before. We will eliminate everything.”

Gallant did not say that!

What he actually said is:

'Gaza will not go back to being what it was.
Hamas will not exist.
We will eliminate everything...
There will not be a situation in which they will be able to murder our brothers, our children and our parents.'

The subtitles do not translate his second sentence. It should read:


If you listen you will hear him say "Hamas lo yihye", and this is not translated.

 

[shack]

I know. Israel should not have even been formed and we wouldn't have this shit alright.

Idiotic.

If the Queen had Balls, she'd be the King. Israel WAS formed

No. He said and I quote:"Gaza wont return to what it was before. We will eliminate everything". He did not qualify, he made a blanket statement that Israel will eliminate everything. Everything includes, humans, animals, homes, hospitals, places of worship, schools, you name it. As I said, case closed.

A lie. He said that Gaza will not return to what it was before.

Who are you to be his interpreter? You are not able to understand your own words.

 

[Kautilya]

Idiotic.

If the Queen had Balls, she'd be the King. Israel WAS formed

Yes. And they can now live right next to the Palestinians and get off their backs or continue the oppression and suffer more violence. I think it is in everybody's interests that they work for a permanent resolution.

A lie. He said that Gaza will not return to what it was before. Who are you to be his interpreter? You are not able to understand your own words.

Moronic.

That is exactly what I said. He said "Gaza wont return to what it was before. We will eliminate everything". You are repeating the first part of what I said and calling it a lie.

"Gaza won't return to what it was before. We will eliminate everything.”

Gallant did not say that!

What he actually said is:

'Gaza will not go back to being what it was.
Hamas will not exist.
We will eliminate everything...
There will not be a situation in which they will be able to murder our brothers, our children and our parents.'

The subtitles do not translate his second sentence. It should read:


If you listen you will hear him say "Hamas lo yihye", and this is not translated.

So he did say We will eliminate everything. If he wanted to just say Hamas, he should have said We will eliminate Hamas. He said Hamas will not exist, Gaza will not be what it was before, we will eliminate everything. Which means, Hamas, civilians, animals, buildings, homes, schools etc.,

This interpretation also makes sense because according to the Israel, "There are no non-combatants in Gaza". That was their President's quote.

 

[Klatuu]

You are incapable of telling us what a "Ziontologist" is.

Is it someone who hates Jews but studies how to pretend that it's about Zionism.

Please provide an alternate definition but if you can't it means that you accept my definition.

Refusing to reply means that you are ceding the narrative. What is a Ziontologist according to a one-celled Jew hater.

Logical fallacy

 

[Klatuu]

What is it. An opera house? Clearly it's a hospital. You're talking out of your biasses

Inane

 

[The Oracle]

.

So he did say We will eliminate everything. If he wanted to just say Hamas, he should have said We will eliminate Hamas. He said Hamas will not exist, Gaza will not be what it was before, we will eliminate everything. Which means, Hamas, civilians, animals, buildings, homes, schools etc.,

Instead of spending all your time on here why don't you go write for Haaretz,lol...

 

[Kautilya]

Instead of spending all your time on here why don't you go write for Haaretz,lol...

Yeah I will go to Haaretz and you go write for Rebel News lol.

 

[The Oracle]

Yeah I will go to Haaretz and you go write for Rebel News lol.

Unlike you I don't have the time...

 

[Kautilya]

Unlike you I don't have the time...

Well you've been here 20 years. Seems to indicate differently.

 

[whynot888]

Well you've been here 20 years. Seems to indicate differently.

Bruh, you been here just over a year and already have over 9000 post?

 

[whynot888]

2024 UJA Walk With Israel

www.walkwithisrael.com