You know as well as anyone that "number of people killed" isn't the defining characteristic of genocide.
Israel at war
- Thread starter Butler1000
- Start date
The NYPD humiliating themselves like this with books and bike chains is one small thing I can enjoy about it all as a sort of dark humour.
The fact that you need to draw the line there says a lot. It's obvious why you don't want to start in 1919 when Arab leaders incited mob violence against indigenous Jewish populations or 1948 when Palestinian and Arab leadership chose rejection and war.
Yet when it comes to Israel's Jews, you have said they all should be expelled, even the ones who have dedicated their lives to fighting for Palestinian rights.
I love that you are at least attempting to discuss history. Would you like some of the gaps filled in? I know you refuse to believe Arabs can have agency or ability to make their decisions but...
I actually spent 15 minutes writing up a deep summary of the conflict but I know you won't read and instead will just scream , yell, spam tweets, and fake posts.
What hypocrisy. If you want to deal with what to do next, then there's no reason to start in 1967.
Next should be pressuring both sides to negotiate something that works for the 10 million Israelis, 5 million in West Bank and Gaza, and the millions of refugees and descendants.
And it is moronic to claim Canada's theft of land created a legitimate state but say it's illegitimate for Jews to continue being in the Middle East.
Except they have in the past and Olmert's offer in 2008 offered a completely contiguous Palestinian state.
And sorry but why would anyone offer a state before working out any details or even getting the other side to accept that state as a permanent resolution to the conflict?
'
That's a problem.
First, keeping the settlements is a war crime.
Second, if you do, all you're left with are Bantustans.
How would that be different from the de facto apartheid state there now?
That's strange because the entirety of what you typed was this:
I don't see what you claim. For sure, though, I see that you called Palestinians "lesser humans". You keep referring to genocide, so there's denying that's who you meant.
Armed Gazan gangs, some thought tied to Hamas, steal $70 million from Bank of Palestine
French daily Le Monde reports funds taken from the vaults of several branches in the Strip by groups armed with explosives, commandos who answer to 'Gaza's highest authorities'
www.timesofisrael.com
Do you think the zionists who call themselves the 'chosen people' think that slaughtering the Palestinians they refuse basic human rights to think they are on a path to righteousness, hammy? Under Israeli apartheid, Palestinians have zero human rights, do you think that makes them legally 'lesser humans' than Israeli Jews?
Do you support keeping Palestinians legally as 'lesser humans' on your own path to righteousness on this board?
Is that why you keep arguing they are not part of the 'civilized world'?
Will you stand by me and categorically state Palestinians are full humans who deserve all basic human rights, including the right to self defence and the Universal Right of Return? Or are you still here arguing they don't deserve the same right as all other humans?
