Israel at war
- Thread starter Butler1000
- Start date
None of that is relevant or in any way justifies collective punishments, carpet bombings, death or genocide. Heck, it does not even justify considering ALL Gazans as Hamas combatants or possible Hamas combatants. That is racist. That is islamophobic. That is a war crime. That is in violation of international law. That is morally bankrupt. That is genocide. That is evil.
American settlers in the west bank are some of the worst humanity can offer up. They are not any different from the Hamas.
How American citizens are leading rise of ‘settler violence’ on Palestinian lands
The Biden administration instituted a travel ban on extremist Jewish settlers who attack Palestinians but there is a glaring loophole for US citizenswww.theguardian.com
It's 100% relevant. You love dismissing out of hand, anything that will not fit your narrative. It's easier than actually debating it.
Lie. Hamas is using human shields.
Nothing justifies Oct. 7. This retribution was caused by Oct. 7.
In your imagination. It's a big lie in an attempt to stir up more Anti-Israeli rhetoric.
Nobody does.
Wanting to see Israel wiped off the map is racist.
Israel is fighting Hamas, not the Muslim people. It's kind of funny how you just now conflated Hamas with the Muslim people. That is just what you accused others of doing.
That is loser talk is what it is.
If any country in the entire world is fighting for its' very existence they will resort to whatever means are at their disposal to survive. India would nuke China in a heartbeat if they felt it was necessary to survive.
THIS IS WAR. Neither side will play fair.
Oct. 7 was not fair. It's a war crime.
Using civilians as human shields is not fair. It's a war crime.
Which side is worse or which side does it more is irrelevant. It's war. Ham ass butts are getting kicked big time. They are the big time losers.
Page 26
They reference all the reports, UN, HRW, Amnesty, B'tselem and others.
Enjoy.
Sure. There are some independent thinkers on both sides. That's why it's dumb when some people try to paint everybody on one side of the political spectrum with the same brush.
No. I think it means that thousands more Palestinians will die while Hamas refuses to surrender. Did you say that you'd be satisfied with 500,000 dying or were you looking for more? I wish Hamas would surrender tomorrow and no more Palestinians would have to die in this war.
But a Hamas defeat is inevitable. Which country is sending in reinforcements to help Hamas. Gaza is surrounded. How will Hamas get more weapons? The Hebrew writing is on the wall for them. In the end Hamas will be the ones wailing at that wall. Well, maybe just their supporters because the Hamas vermin will have been exterminated.
Because Hamas hides among civilians and Israel isn't willing to just wipe everyone out (no matter how much you claim it's a genocide)
Hillarious.
South Africa who rejected the ICC warrant against Putin now wants to use the legal infrastructure for their benifit.
Sorry but I believe in democracy and self determination so if only 5% of Palestinians and 11% of Israelis support a One State peace and much of the Palestinian leadership are VIOLENTLY opposed to it, it's a non-starter.
I support pressuring both sides to negotiate a peace that they can live with, not dictating to them something that both sides hate.
That makes absolutely no sense.
You whine about what's (understandably) happening to the Gazans but refuse to call for what is in their best interests. A Hamas surrender.
You have so much hate, blood must be pouring from your eyes. Your posts are becoming nonsensical.
Way fewer than there used to be. At the same time, Israel's Christian population is growing.
And both the PA and Hamas define their Palestine as an Islamic state ruled by Islamic Law. Not that you and Frank care what Palestinians say.
Understood, but the US needs Israel for the protection of their national interests. Aside from the radicals on either side, both parties support Israel. There are no viable alternatives in that regions.
initiating proceedings against Israel for violations of the Genocide Convention.
So, that's what I said. This motion deals with only the "Genocide" Convention.
Even though apartheid is mentioned in passing, apartheid is not part of the actual motion. They are complaining about "genocide".
The ground war will have been over for a long time before that. Covert operations to take out leaders like NyahNyah take longer. That is what Nettie's referring to. Remember, he said every last Hamas terrorist.
Look how long it took to take out Bin Laden.
Its not war, its a 75 year occupation that has escalated into apartheid and now genocide.
And its only Israelis that support terrorism, or targeting civilians.
Not Palestinians.
And you've said every last Palestinian is Hamas.
Israel has said the same thing after every massacre.
The difference is they went too far this time and this will be the end of zionism.
Of course you are gloating about genocide.
Same tactic again. It was an example to demonstrate how every single country in the world, including India, will pull out all the stops required for survival, even if they involve war crimes.
Not one country fighting for their existence would care.
Knock yourself out. Call them what you want but Israel needs to survive.
Accusations will not stop them. You can win the war of semantics, Israel will win the war of survival.
Oh. Of course not. So why is the destruction of Israel is in Hamas' charter? Talk about false narratives. There is so much BS in that post.
I did not say Israel was fighting Muslims. I said Israel is indiscriminately attacking Palestinians and to call ALL Palestinians Hamas, is Islamophobic. The fact that you even included the word Muslims, in your response when I did not use that word, is a freudian slip and shows that you agree that this is Islamophobic.
They killed 1,200 and are prepared to do it over and over and over again until all the Jews are killed. They proved that they are willing to do whatever it takes. Hamas wants Israel gone. Hezbollah wants Israel gone. Houthis want Israel gone. Iran wants Israel gone. What could be considered more of an existential threat.
Are you saying that because Israel is stronger that they should not retaliate, that they should not try to recover the hostages, they should not try to ensure the safety of their civilians looking ahead? Israel is entitled to have those objectives. It's not their fault that Hamas is using the civilians as shields.
They may commit war crimes and they may face consequences but they will survive. Just the same as any country, even India, home of the world's greatest pacifist, would do. They'd all commit atrocities if push came to shove.
All citizens of Israel, Jew or Christian or Muslim, have equal rights. It's the nation of Islam that tolerates no others. If they kill all the Jews, they'll go after Christians next, just like they've done in Bethlehem.
Last edited:
Can your lies get any more ridiculous? Find the post.
In the meantime, I don't think I got an answer. You said that Nettie is prepared to kill 500,000 Palestinians.
Would you rather see Hamas surrender to save those lives or would you rather see them keep fighting and see those half million die? We know that Israel would not accept a ceasefire, so those are the only 2 choices available. Which is your choice, oh master of Palestinian welfare and resident coward?
You are looking at the end of Israel if they die, shack.
Zionism is on its last legs already.
All Israel and you do is provide more evidence for the trial.
576,326 people signed and won this petition
Support South Africa’s case against Israel at the ICJ
www.change.org
You mean the trial that means nothing as Israel celebrates its' survival in the war/on the ground? That's not such a bad tradeoff.
