I'm pointing out that you lie in every post. You go crazy when somebody stands up to your bullying. You can't deal with it.You think that post was honest?
I'm pointing out that you lie in every post. You go crazy when somebody stands up to your bullying. You can't deal with it.You think that post was honest?
You're too afraid to answer.If Trudeau's prediction is right than this will lead to the end of zionism and the 75 year occupation.
So the purpose is to attack Israel and not expect retaliation well...that escalated in huge proportion...they are really dumb then? Or they just don't care about Palestinians? Which is it? I'd say both....hamas leaders will ever set foot in Gaza....they gonna get lynched by the mob....The purpose of the attack on Israel is not to invade Israel or win. There was no military objective except it was retaliation for settler violence. On the other hand, there was definitely a political objective to bring the world's focus back to the conflict, to disrupt the Israel-Saudi deal, to take hostages and get Palestinian prisoners released from prison and most importantly to disrupt the status quo and create a need for a 2 state solution (although in my opinion it will not happen).
![]()
Analysis: Why did Hamas attack now and what is next?
A number of factors led to Hamas's operation in southern Israel.www.aljazeera.com
Of course the Israelis do. They sit on the hills of Sderot and watch Gaza being bombed, while sipping tea and cheering and chanting "Baruch Hashem" or some shit like that.
That is what I said. Many of the explosions you see are the Trophy APS and the video Klatuu posted did have a damaged tank being towed away. Am sure that tank didn't blow up by itself. So yes, Hamas is unlikely to inflict significant damage on the Merkavas with their RPGs but the probability of damage isn't zero.
The Nazis thought they were winners up until 1945.Only the winners get to write history. As such, you're wasting bandwidth.
You think Israel allowing 233 settler terrorist attacks and actively stealing land in the West Bank meant they didn't expect retaliation?So the purpose is to attack Israel and not expect retaliation well...that escalated in huge proportion...they are really dumb then? Or they just don't care about Palestinians? Which is it? I'd say both....hamas leaders will ever set foot in Gaza....they gonna get lynched by the mob....
I'm pointing out that you make this accusation repeatedly then run away every time I ask you to prove it.I'm pointing out that you lie in every post. You go crazy when somebody stands up to your bullying. You can't deal with it.
Do you think getting a chance to kill 10,000 Palestinian children and starve 570,000 Palestinians is worth the end of zionism?You're too afraid to answer.
Seeing as the price Palestinians are paying in relation to the Hamas attack, do you think that the attack was worth it?
Mark agitpropThe Nazis thought they were winners up until 1945.
570,000 people are now starving.
War crimes rampant.
![]()
You mean like Kurt Weill? Great theatre tradition, buddy.Mark agitpropwhat a source
ag·it·prop
/ˈajətˌpräp/
noun
- political (originally communist) propaganda, especially in art or literature.
I will try not to go the way of agitprop ahahaYou mean like Kurt Weill? Great theatre tradition, buddy.
Here's the longer post directly from the WHO.
Read it and either do your own happy dance or realize what you've become.
I know which way you'll go.
Then the inescapable conclusion is that the tide is turning and a more accurate history is emerging and it’s not favorable to Israel.Only the winners get to write history. As such, you're wasting bandwidth.
Agitprop is still a thing in theatre, film and tv.I will try not to go the way of agitprop ahaha
Agitprop is short for agitatsiya propaganda, according to Encyclopedia Britannica. It's a two-pronged approach to political influence inspired by Marxist thinkers: The propaganda part, Soviet leader Vladimir Lenin described, pushes the social and political factors behind an idea; agitation, the encyclopedia said, is "the use of political slogans and half-truths to exploit the grievances of the public and thereby mold public opinion and mobilize public support."
![]()
Brought to you by the people who say there are no civilians in Gaza and now offer future seaside property there instead.
I will pray to allah to stop hamas from taking civilians foodAgitprop is still a thing in theatre, film and tv.
The West Wing was agitprop.
Why am I not surprised that you went there instead of discussing whether its good or bad that 570,000 people in Gaza could starve to death?
You are really quite disgusting.I will pray to allah to stop hamas from taking civilians food
100 people a day now dying of starvations.
I hope they get more food to those poor people.You are really quite disgusting.
The WFP says 577,000 people are at starvation levels, meaning about 100 people a die dying from starvation and you, like shack, joked about.
That's nazi level crap.
WFP official calls for ‘sustained’ access to Gaza amid staggering hunger
A spokesperson for the World Food Programme (WFP) says “the complexity, the magnitude and the speed” of the hunger crisis in Gaza is “unprecedented” and has been fuelled almost entirely by the fighting.
As we reported earlier, a UN-backed report has found that at least 577,000 people in Gaza are currently facing famine. The classification typically means that two out of 10,000 people are dying every day from starvation.
577,000 starving right now.I hope they get more food to those poor people.
I support a massive humanitarian aid response.577,000 starving right now.
The only way they get fed is if there is a ceasefire and a massive international human aid response.
Do you support that?





