You have obviously not read my posts on this and other threads. Hamas are the de facto government of Gaza. The settlers are criminals and do not represent the government in any way. Hamas embeds itself in schools, hospitals, mosques and anywhere else there are crows if civilians including children.Saying non-racist things in other threads, and showing absolutely no empathy for Palestinian lives even after 10,000+ people, half of them children have died, exposes you toguy5252. You need to introspect.
Why don't we come to a mid ground agreement ?
Hamas are terrorists for attacking unsuspecting civilians. Setter extremists are terrorists for attacking unsuspecting civilians.
But Hamas are BETTER terrorists. Whereas settlers are domestic terrorists. Happy?
Israel at war
- Thread starter Butler1000
- Start date
Arab citizens of Israel - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Its not an apartheid state because over 2 million arab Muslims live peaceably within the borders with the same rights as Jews. If it was an Apartheid state that would not be the case.
What they are are the remnants of a failed war who are generally hated throughout the Arab world for having tried to overthrow govts, supported the Iraq invasion of Kuwait, were involved in the assassination of Anwar Sadat, and despite being Sunni align themselves with Shia Muslims in Iran. Thats why govts in the region won't help them. And why Israel is going to win.
Yeah. You're missing the part where you're supposed to say "I condemn Hamas' attack on Israeli civilians as a terrorist attack." If you've said anything close to that, I'll apologize. Your generalized sweeping statements of violence, terrorism, both sides mean nothing. That's just your dancing.
That's what's missing. And that's why multiplying zero as many times as you want is still zero.
It is just as obvious as if he did. Only deniers would dare to pretend otherwise and to think that other people are stupid enough to believe them when they say they thought it meant something else.
Sort of like those 2012 Israeli posters saying it was Israel vs the savages.
Still pretty much the same, by the way.
You know how you make people angry enough to turn to terrorism?
There really needs to be a ceasefire, not more death.
Not that I disagree with everything you, but everything you say sounds like justification for the Oct. 7 attack that triggered this current round of violence.
Going after military positions and military leaders is not a war crime. Using human shields to hide behind IS a war crime.
Read the full report linked below.
The state sends IDF forces out to back up settler terrorism and aid in colonization of what could have been Palestine.
You know all this.
B'tselem:
The state legitimizes this reality in two complementary ways:
A. Legalizing land takeover
B. Legitimizing physical violence against Palestinians
Israel’s apartheid against Palestinians: a cruel system of domination and a crime against humanity
Israeli authorities must be held accountable for committing the crime of apartheid against Palestinians, Amnesty International said today in a damning new report. The investigation details how Israel enforces a system of oppression and domination against the Palestinian people wherever it has...www.amnesty.org
What to Know About the Arab Citizens of Israel
Arabs represent one-fifth of Israel’s population. Systemic discrimination, outbreaks of communal violence, and the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict continue to strain their ties with Israel’s Jew…
www.cfr.org
This one is a much more balanced take on things.
That's their interpretation.
Official government policy is documented. I'll accept copies of those Israeli government documents.
So is lying about Hamas hiding everywhere to justify targeting civilians.
That's a war crime too.
But so is ethnic cleansing.
You think this plan, as reported by CBC, is real?
That's like saying you'd only take proof that Jeffrey Dahmer was a mass murderer from his own statements.
Like the one with the plan to ethnically cleanse Gaza?
Or more like Plan Dalet?
Was there an official guidebook and policy paper for Auschwitz that you think they should use as a model?
Cuz all genocides had guidebooks and policy papers they referred to during the killngs.
Or do you need something official like this?
Ah, you want the magic word 'terrorist' applied instead of the legal term 'war crime'.
Of course.
Because if you're just accused of war crimes, which are actual crimes with laws against them, then you only face the law.
But if you use the magic word 'terrorist' right wing racists say that means you can kill anyone and everyone near them or who knows them.
You want me to say the word that you think justifies genocide.
It doesn't.
There will come a time when this is done and people will ask did you stand with humanity or did you back genocide.
No magic word can excuse your support of killing children.
That's on you, buddy.
Yes, they are documenting the genocide that you are backing.
You think its wrong document the war crimes?
Lying is a war crime? LOL.
Using children as human shields is definitely criminal.
Than embracing war crimes?
Yes.
Don't.
I don't object to military action or to countering Hamas.
I object to your belief that the best way to do that is war crimes.
See.
This is the exact "Something must be done, this is something" logic.
Here you are saying that anything short of a foolproof peace plan requires war crimes.
It's an insane position to take, even for you with your long track record of "If I don't get 100% of what I think is best, I should accept nothing and support things that will make it worse" as an approach.
