What kind of planet do you live on, buddy??They already have routed the IDF
What kind of planet do you live on, buddy??They already have routed the IDF
Ummmm, explain what you just wrote?They already have routed the IDF. Nothing will ever change that. It will be taught in military colleges around the world forever. It’s slaughter of thousands of civilians and children is testament to its incompetence.
It’s rather self evident.Ummmm, explain what you just wrote?
The one that saw the route of the IDF on Oct 7. That debacle will be taught in every military college.What kind of planet do you live on, buddy??
It’s rather self evident.
Gotta stop eating those shrooms, bud.The one that saw the route of the IDF on Oct 7. That debacle will be taught in every military college.
It will be taught as what happens when you bite off more than you can chew. I agree there was a failure by the intelligence services to see the attack. But what's going to follow is the end of Hamas.They already have routed the IDF. Nothing will ever change that. It will be taught in military colleges around the world forever. It’s slaughter of thousands of civilians and children is testament to its incompetence.
According to wiki in the ensuing battle 1,000 Hamas militants were killed, and 357 IDF soldiers were killed.The one that saw the route of the IDF on Oct 7. That debacle will be taught in every military college
www.theonion.com
Good catch. Glad you caught the most evil person around.
Yes, international pressure stopped Israel in 2008, 2011, 2014, 2018 and 2021.As far as Israel’s “war crimes” go. All the whining in the world isn’t going to stop them. Not presently, not historically
Has it?
Its more important not to post Israeli mistranslations from MEMRI.
What was mistranslated? I don’t speak ArabicIts more important not to post Israeli mistranslations from MEMRI.
You might as well go all phil and post directly from the IDF claiming everyone they killed was Hamas.
No, I'm not asking for your opinions or trying to straw man you.You want me to give an opinion on it the Court's will or won't rule that targets hit by Israel with WP are civilian or not, from a video that doesn't even show WP, and despite the fact that I've made no comments about the civilian targets?
I wish you would quit strawmanning me. I've been very clear: the only issue I had with your post was that the video shown was not WP and that the comments accompanying it stating the use of WP was a war crime were incorrect. That's the extent of what I said and it's disingenuous to try and twist my words and ask me to defend something else.





