CupidS Escorts

Israel at war

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,423
4,634
113
So what does it matter who ruled the land, or who is ruling presently? That is not a reason to say that the Palestinians do not deserve a state. They want one now and have wanted one for like 40 years or so. Before Israel's formation the majority of today's Jews or their ancestors did not even live in that region (I am talking present day Israel, not the middle east) and yet worked the political elites in the colonial UK govt. to set up state for themselves. The Palestinian demand for a state is therefore more legitimate today, than the Jewish demand 100 years ago.

And countries need contiguity, and I dont understand your comment about Bangladesh. Bangladesh is a contiguous land. Or are you referring to the time when it was East Pakistan? Look how that turned out lol.

And I am not going to choose which plan, 67 or 48, or Olmert or whatever. I will leave that to the experts. I will just make the following statements:

- Palestine has to accept Israel as a legitimate state.
- Israel has to accept Palestine as a legitimate state.
- Both countries need to be open to compromise.
- Palestine should make commitments on dropping extremism or take measures to curb extremism.
- Israels should cede land to Palestine. How much is unclear and I will leave it to the experts. But I would agree with the UN, to back to the 1948 plan and start from there.
- Palestine should be given complete and total sovereignty. Palestinian independence should be all encompassing - politically, economically and morally all encompassing. Which means, they are able to establish their own state, adopt and elect their own government, control their immigration, borders, airspace, are able to have a military of their own and adopt their own economic and foreign policy and so on.

That is what will lead to lasting peace.
Pretty much none of your points will actually happen or be agreed too. That's the reality. Religion is quite in the way. And so reason is out the window.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kautilya

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,435
1,760
113
Again, if I recall correctly, Nagasaki was a substitute target. So it was not ideal.
Any reason you ignored my first point?

In any case, the primary target was Kokura, also not particularly flat, especially to the West and South West.


Regardless, I have said I'd love to read any source you have that says the terrain was a deciding factor in target selection. I've shown my sources don't say that. Do you have any that say it was?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,682
22,197
113
You do realize that edited videos to get a certain perspective are hardly representative of the population as a whole. Israel has racists and has systemic racism towards minority Arabs but that is hardly something unique to them.

Polling is far more representative and that shows far less of a problem. On the other hand,
Israel is apartheid. That is very unique.
Why is it that Israel supporters say single videos can represent Palestinians but not the other way around?
And why is it that you don't think that's problematic?


 

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
9,652
9,397
113
Any reason you ignored my first point?

In any case, the primary target was Kokura, also not particularly flat, especially to the West and South West.


Regardless, I have said I'd love to read any source you have that says the terrain was a deciding factor in target selection. I've shown my sources don't say that. Do you have any that say it was?
I may have been wrong about how much it mattered for target selection. It did however seem to matter to how the blast wave would travel and what destruction it would cause.
I read Leslie Groves book many years ago and I guess I got the issues a bit confused.
 
Last edited:

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,682
22,197
113
Mandela was NEVER listed as aterrorist by Canada.

The IRA WERE a terrorist group but thanks to NEGOTIATIONS, they were given amnesty when they committed to peace.

Moral people including many Palestinians would love Hamas to become a purely political organization. Meanwhile Hamas is still committed to death and destruction and you're still trying to claim that Oct. 7 targeted military.
I didn't say Canada, he was on the US terrorist watch.

I love that you mention NEGOTIATIONS as if that were some secret thing nobody knows about.
Hamas has repeatedly offered to negotiate for the hostages but Israel refuses.
Israel has also refused to negotiate for peace for the last decade, preferring instead to just take more Palestinian land by force and make apartheid more and more obvious.

So why the fuck aren't you supporting NEGOTIATIONS instead of backing genocide?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: richaceg

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,435
1,760
113
Not if it is used for military purposes like housing equipment.

Hamas hiding out in hospitals make them fair game.
Under international law it's not that cut and dry. The rules of war still require a proportional proportionality analysis unless it's self-defense, but for it to be self-defense attacks have to be originating from the hospital or anticipated to originate from the hospital at the time the strike is initiated.

Your enemy is allowed to be at hospitals. They can be there tending to wounded, the can be there being tended to as wounded, they can be there visiting family, they can be there just hanging out. Even if it was a Hamas-only military field hospital, there are still parts of Geneva, Hague and Rome that apply protecting it. All hospitals are protected targets. Bring a protected target doesn't mean you can't attack them ever, but it means there are very strict conditions on when you can and "there are enemy there" is not sufficient. Certainly "there are probably some enemy there" isn't sufficient.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,423
4,634
113
Under international law it's not that cut and dry. The rules of war still require a proportional proportionality analysis unless it's self-defense, but for it to be self-defense attacks have to be originating from the hospital or anticipated to originate from the hospital at the time the strike is initiated.

Your enemy is allowed to be at hospitals. They can be there tending to wounded, the can be there being tended to as wounded, they can be there visiting family, they can be there just hanging out. Even if it was a Hamas-only military field hospital, there are still parts of Geneva, Hague and Rome that apply protecting it. All hospitals are protected targets. Bring a protected target doesn't mean you can't attack them ever, but it means there are very strict conditions on when you can and "there are enemy there" is not sufficient. Certainly "there are probably some enemy there" isn't sufficient.
How about their headquarters for planning attacks with tunnel entrances to the network?
 
  • Like
Reactions: xmontrealer

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,435
1,760
113
I may have been wrong about how much it mattered for target selection. It did however seem to matter to how the blast wave would travel and what destruction it would cause.
I'll be the first to admit I don't know everything and I've been wrong before. I find it difficult to operate on the assumption I'm wrong, but it's always possible. Just because my sources don't list it and I don't recall ever hearing it doesn't mean it's not true, so it's very possible you're right and it was part of the selection.

I read Leslie Groves book many years ago and I guess I got the issues a bit confused.
Or maybe it says exactly what you think it does. It's this one?


I've never read it but I've ordered a copy now. Thanks for mentioning it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leimonis

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,435
1,760
113
How about their headquarters for planning attacks with tunnel entrances to the network?
This is going up blow your mind.....

...but as a protected structure, they would still need to conduct a proportional proportionality analysis to justify it even if they had reliable intelligence from Aman supporting your hypothetical situation. If missiles come flying out the hospital windows then they can bomb it without conducting the analysis. Tunnels underneath it don't let Israel skip proportional proportionality either.

I get you don't like that answer and think it shouldn't matter. But that's what the laws of war say. They actually were written and amended specifically for situations like this to ensure that it wasn't easy to make up excuses to blow up civilians and civilian infrastructure.
 

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
9,652
9,397
113
Are you claiming they are lying?

Maybe you should support opening the death camp walls so the WHO and ICRC can come in and confirm how many children Israel has really killed.
1. believing hamas math is ridiculous
2. nobody can fully avoid collateral damage while responding to a threat
 

HungSowel

Well-known member
Mar 3, 2017
2,832
1,715
113
Aside from Israel, everyone in the Middle East is militarily and economically weak with the exception of Saudi Arabia as they run OPEC but SA is so militarily weak that they will side with Israel and the US for military protection.

There is no legitimate threat to the existence of Israel that justifies this level of retribution.

What is happening now is similar to the 2nd Iraq invasion, sense and reason go out the window and a rabid thirst for vengeance takes over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dirtyharry555

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
This is going up blow your mind.....

...but as a protected structure, they would still need to conduct a proportional proportionality analysis to justify it even if they had reliable intelligence from Aman supporting your hypothetical situation. If missiles come flying out the hospital windows then they can bomb it without conducting the analysis. Tunnels underneath it don't let Israel skip proportional proportionality either.

I get you don't like that answer and think it shouldn't matter. But that's what the laws of war say. They actually were written and amended specifically for situations like this to ensure that it wasn't easy to make up excuses to blow up civilians and civilian infrastructure.
so there is a hospital or schoo or mosque or whatever and intelligence says there is a command and control centre in that basement and rockets are being launched etc. what is a propionate response?
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,423
4,634
113
This is going up blow your mind.....

...but as a protected structure, they would still need to conduct a proportional proportionality analysis to justify it even if they had reliable intelligence from Aman supporting your hypothetical situation. If missiles come flying out the hospital windows then they can bomb it without conducting the analysis. Tunnels underneath it don't let Israel skip proportional proportionality either.

I get you don't like that answer and think it shouldn't matter. But that's what the laws of war say. They actually were written and amended specifically for situations like this to ensure that it wasn't easy to make up excuses to blow up civilians and civilian infrastructure.
Laws of War?

That implies it's civilized. And by extension normalizes it.

Both sides are choosing no quarter. Good luck sorting it out in the rubble and the fog of war. I get you don't like that answer as well. It implies your professed profession is inherently uncivilized.


It is.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
Aside from Israel, everyone in the Middle East is militarily and economically weak with the exception of Saudi Arabia as they run OPEC but SA is so militarily weak that they will side with Israel and the US for military protection.

There is no legitimate threat to the existence of Israel that justifies this level of retribution.

What is happening now is similar to the 2nd Iraq invasion, sense and reason go out the window and a rabid thirst for vengeance takes over.
Ha? Have you been living on another planet for the last 50 years? Hamas has several thousand rockets, Hezbollah has something like 150,000 rockets, Syria Yemen, Iran etc.
 

DinkleMouse

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2022
1,435
1,760
113
so there is a hospital or schoo or mosque or whatever and intelligence says there is a command and control centre in that basement and rockets are being launched etc. what is a propionate response?
If rockets are coming out of the windows, you're allowed to act in self-defense to neutralize the threat.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts