Who actually invited this guy and was in charge of this stunt? Was it the speaker? If so who vetted him? Did the background checks and verified the story of his past?
The Poles killed the Ukrainians. The Ukrainians killed the Poles. Eastern Europe in 44-45 was a lot like the Serbs and Croats in the 1990's. The Reds killed them both.Poland is taking steps to extradite this Parliament Hill nazi. Why? The division he was in was responsible for HORRIFIC crimes against the Poles. hundreds of thousand of innocent civilians. Men women and children were slaughtered by them.
Notty, NONE of the guys in this thread who are now bashing the Libs would have figured it out either. In fact, none of them has even bothered to do any basic reading on the topic and none of them can discuss the issue even after I have flagged reading areas for them.After the speaker said the guy fought for Ukraine against the Russians in WWII let the record show the Con
's were equally brainless in putting 2 and 2 together, also applauded the Waffen SS criminal.
Clue # 1 - there was no Ukraine in WWII
Clue#2 - Who were the Russians fighting in WWII.
DOOH!!!
Actually, Mitch, no. As usual.Tasha Kheiriddin: Trudeau's handling of Rota affair has very real implications for Ukraine
Putin’s propaganda about 'denazifying Ukraine' just got a major boost from Canadanationalpost.com
Nah.Poland is taking steps to extradite this Parliament Hill nazi. Why? The division he was in was responsible for HORRIFIC crimes against the Poles. hundreds of thousand of innocent civilians. Men women and children were slaughtered by them.
it only means dick all to all 'Suck Trudeau" bros.committed war crimes EIGHTY YEARS AGO means dick all to anyone except the "Fuck Trudeau!" bros. It was 80 years ago.
Okay, buddy. I guess that means we shouldn't be in NATO with Germany either or trade with Japan, right?it only means dick all to all 'Suck Trudeau" bros.
to normal people war crimes are war crimes regardless how long ago it happened
Seriously, dude....You may be right. It isn't intuitive to immediately deduce that Hunka could have possibly fought for the Nazis.
But the responsibility still lies with Trudeau as the guy running point regardless of who invited the guy. It's the way leadership works.
WTF does NATO have to do with anything?Okay, buddy. I guess that means we shouldn't be in NATO with Germany either or trade with Japan, right?
And how about those French fuckers and the Fort William massacre of 1755?!?!?!?
He keeps on saying how it was deeply embarrassing for the house and for Canada.Not the history. But the responsibility of vetting the guest. I mean, even if the speakers office acted independently, the responsibility for failing to properly vet this guest, and representing Canada in a bad way to another world leader, eventually falls on the leader of the government. Which is Trudeau. He is trying to distance himself, was absent from parliament etc., which makes him look even worse. It would have looked better if he had showed up, and apologized and the speaker also apologized and resigned.
You totally missed what I just wrote. Sad.WTF does NATO have to do with anything?
the guy is a war criminal.
Well, if the incident was so minor, then why was Rota forced to resign??Actually, Mitch, no. As usual.
The fact that a dude fought with a unit in 44-45 that allegedly committed war crimes EIGHTY YEARS AGO means dick all to anyone except the "Fuck Trudeau!" bros. It was 80 years ago.
do not make this thread about you as usual pleaseYou totally missed what I just wrote. Sad.
Trudeau nuthuggers are going to nuthug...It's who they are.it only means dick all to all 'Suck Trudeau" bros.
to normal people war crimes are war crimes regardless how long ago it happened
Fark!