Leafs '22/'23 Thread

HumbleJoe

Well-known member
Dec 1, 2021
1,241
1,641
113
Yes, but Marner has been continually useless in the playoffs. The Leafs have to trade Marner ASAP, while he still has two yrs, remaining on his contract. Hopefully, the Leafs can trade Marner by July 1/2023, before Marner's no-move clause, kicks in.
Two separate issues. Should they trade Marner? Yes. If they decide not to trade him, will he re-sign with a pay cut? Fuck no.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,023
11,221
113
Sebastian Aho and Mitch Marner became RFA in the same year.

"Sebastian Aho signed a 5 year, $42,295,000 contract with the Carolina Hurricanes on Jul. 1, 2019. The contract has a cap hit of $8,460,250."

marner.JPG
 

smuddan

Well-known member
Mar 7, 2007
2,304
302
83
Just had a chance to watch Shanahan’s explanation of the timeline of the contract extension talks with the Dubas camp and reading between the lines, here’s what I suspect what actually happened :

- After the first round win Shanahan was going to offer Dubas a contract extension ;

- he and Dubas‘ agent had reached some kind of agreement on what the numbers were going to be, X amount if the Leafs should lose to the Panthers and Y amount should the Leafs advance further; the Y amount would be substantially higher;

- after the Leafs got eliminated Dubas’ agent must have received indications from another club that they’re willing to offer him an amount close to the Y amount that the Leafs would have offered should the Leafs advance past the Panthers;

- Shanahan was reluctant to budge;

- Dubas tried to force his hand by coming out with the “family pressure “ bullshit and Shanny was pissed and decided not to offer any extension at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

tml

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2011
5,428
3,145
113
- after the Leafs got eliminated Dubas’ agent must have received indications from another club that they’re willing to offer him an amount close to the Y amount that the Leafs would have offered should the Leafs advance past the Panthers;
However, Dubas said in his press conference that if he didn't re-sign with the Leafs we wouldn't see him working for another team. That would make another teams offer moot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

smuddan

Well-known member
Mar 7, 2007
2,304
302
83
However, Dubas said in his press conference that if he didn't re-sign with the Leafs we wouldn't see him working for another team. That would make another teams offer moot.
You really believe that? He’s only 37 and he’s not going to work for another team but the the Leafs ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
22,259
8,861
113
However, Dubas said in his press conference that if he didn't re-sign with the Leafs we wouldn't see him working for another team. That would make another teams offer moot.
All the pundits are saying, that whoever Dubas' agent is, should be fired. What I heard is that Shanahan and Dubas, had agreed to a contract. Then Dubas' agent, at the last minute, asked MLSE for more money. This pissed Shanny off, and as a result, Dubas was fired!!
 

smuddan

Well-known member
Mar 7, 2007
2,304
302
83
Maybe he did that hoping to get fired. What is his severance package?

However, he probably damaged his prospects with other teams.
The Leafs don’t need to ”fire” him. He’s a contractor and his contract expires on June 30, 2023.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

saxon

Well-known member
Dec 2, 2009
4,760
522
113
There’s a lot of teams looking for new coaches and GM’s, Leafs might not get the one they want.
 

maurice93

Well-known member
Mar 29, 2006
5,956
966
113
The Leafs don’t need to ”fire” him. He’s a contractor and his contract expires on June 30, 2023.
It's likely that he is considered an employee... with an employee contract that had a fixed end date on the contract.

Either way there is no need for a severance package, so we reach the same conclusion. He just needs to be paid out to the end of his current contract.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: roadhog and tml

maurice93

Well-known member
Mar 29, 2006
5,956
966
113
I think a competent employment lawyer will opine that Dubas was an employee and not an independent contractor.
Employees vs Independent Contractors (tslawyers.ca)
I'm sure they would. Dubas is likely an employee in my view. However that is largely irrelevant here.
You do realize that an employees' employment contract can have a fixed end date right?
In Dubas case the contract was the end of June 2023, and I am sure the Leafs will pay him until then. He is not entitled to a cent after that.
 
Last edited:

maurice93

Well-known member
Mar 29, 2006
5,956
966
113
So, even though Dubas was "fired" on May 19th (and relieved of his duties?), the Leafs still have to pay him until June 30th? Could Dubas sue for reputation damages? As an employee, if he was fired without cause, the usual severance is one month pay per year (9 months in Dubas' case).
Independent contractors vs. employees | Canada (osler.com)
Most employees don't have a specified term of their contract (nor specific severance terms) in their agreement, which is why common law comes in to dictate what their severance terms should be once they are terminated.

Dubas, like all GM's had a fixed contract date, which I am sure had the severance terms dictated within it.... common practice for NHL is to pay until the end of the contract.

Its not unlike most executives -- most have specific severance terms in their agreement, and a number have fixed end dates of the current contract as well, which are then renegotiated at the end of the term.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,697
10,105
113
Toronto
- he and Dubas‘ agent had reached some kind of agreement on what the numbers were going to be, X amount if the Leafs should lose to the Panthers and Y amount should the Leafs advance further; the Y amount would be substantially higher;
So another team was negotiating with the Keefe camp while he was under contract to the Leafs? Isn't that improper?
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts