I dunno…was there not a suggestion out there that as long as the nipples were not visibly poking through the shirt then the rest was okay?
In my opinion, it’s not even just the boobs…her entire presentation is clownishly ridiculous. The dress code would have to specifically describe appropriate professional attire…but I have no idea how they can regulate the size of boobs (real or fake) other than insisting that clothing not be too tight or revealing and that staff are clean, well kempt, and present an appropriate professional image?
It’s a difficult question.
Dress codes are really difficult because you have two choices and both can be fucked with if someone deliberately wants to fuck with them.
One - list EVERYTHING you think needs to be there, or otherwise put some very serious limitations.
This has the problem that people mostly hate it if it is too restrictive (everyone in a uniform) and it almost always means something gets left out, because you can't think of everything. Then someone who wants to fuck with it just works to the loopholes and you have to deal with shit all over again.
Two - go for some vague general sense like "professional", "appropriate", and so on.
This has the problem that it isn't strictly defined so you can end up with fights over what is appropriate or not and why.
The simple fact is that if someone is determined to fuck with the system and dares you to crack down on them, you can't do much about it. Either crack down on them and face the backlash (either in public or the lawsuit) or ignore them and deal with them giving a fuck you to the code.