Oakville teacher wears huge prosthetic breasts to shop class

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
22,314
8,687
113
The one thing that the board could have done is transferred them to a different school or assigned them to special needs students or some class where they'd be out of the spotlight.
Which makes me think that the drag thing only happened occasionally or else the right wing anger threads would be flooded with discussions about different outfits they wore each day.
The board has been very quiet about the entire thing, good on them. They've also kept it so that the right wing took months to figure out who the teacher was, if they were still working and what their name was.
Good on the board.
The board did transfer him to other schools. Same results. Busty Lemieux is a total scam artist!!
 

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
22,314
8,687
113
Most people now think that this guy is a troll and is no more trans than you or me. I am guessing that 1 way around it is to characterize tittyman as pulling a scam and trying to obtain an order that he visit a tittydoctor to see if those big bags are real.
That's what I suggested upthread. The board should sue him civilly, and order discoveries. Therefore Busty will be ordered, to be examined by a doctor.
 

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
22,314
8,687
113
If tittyman is unionized - and of course he is, as a teacher - the board will have to pay massive damages, reinstate him to his job with back pay and then publicly apologize and grovel while he shakes his immense fake boobs and mocks them.
What if it's found out that Busty Lemieux was lying. Would the board still have to pay damages??
 

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
7,371
3,523
113
What if it's found out that Busty Lemieux was lying. Would the board still have to pay damages??
We don’t know whether Lemieux’s medical leave has anything to do with her boobs. She was off work since November with a foot injury and this may be the reason that she is still off now. If that’s the case and her medical leave has nothing to do with her boobs then it doesn’t matter if she’s lying.

So I think it depends on why she is off on medical leave. If she is claiming that her gigantomastia is the cause of her inability to work then she would need a doctor’s note confirming this; but we already know that she does not have a note because that’s what she told the NY Post. Thus, I doubt that’s the reason she is off.

Thus, my guess is that her medical leave is based on either:
1. The foot injury;
or
2. Adjustment difficulties related to her transition (ie a mental health issue) and if this is the reason then it doesn’t matter if she has real giant boobs or not because if she believes that she has non-existent boobs that would be consistent with an adjustment disorder/mental health issue.

Either way, I don’t anticipate a doctor will be inspecting Lemieux’ boobs any time soon and, if I was going to bet on the cause of the medical leave my money would be on the foot injury.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,700
60,776
113
I dunno…was there not a suggestion out there that as long as the nipples were not visibly poking through the shirt then the rest was okay?

In my opinion, it’s not even just the boobs…her entire presentation is clownishly ridiculous. The dress code would have to specifically describe appropriate professional attire…but I have no idea how they can regulate the size of boobs (real or fake) other than insisting that clothing not be too tight or revealing and that staff are clean, well kempt, and present an appropriate professional image?

It’s a difficult question.
Dress codes are really difficult because you have two choices and both can be fucked with if someone deliberately wants to fuck with them.

One - list EVERYTHING you think needs to be there, or otherwise put some very serious limitations.
This has the problem that people mostly hate it if it is too restrictive (everyone in a uniform) and it almost always means something gets left out, because you can't think of everything. Then someone who wants to fuck with it just works to the loopholes and you have to deal with shit all over again.

Two - go for some vague general sense like "professional", "appropriate", and so on.
This has the problem that it isn't strictly defined so you can end up with fights over what is appropriate or not and why.

The simple fact is that if someone is determined to fuck with the system and dares you to crack down on them, you can't do much about it. Either crack down on them and face the backlash (either in public or the lawsuit) or ignore them and deal with them giving a fuck you to the code.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knuckle Ball

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
22,314
8,687
113
We don’t know whether Lemieux’s medical leave has anything to do with her boobs. She was off work since November with a foot injury and this may be the reason that she is still off now. If that’s the case and her medical leave has nothing to do with her boobs then it doesn’t matter if she’s lying.

So I think it depends on why she is off on medical leave. If she is claiming that her gigantomastia is the cause of her inability to work then she would need a doctor’s note confirming this; but we already know that she does not have a note because that’s what she told the NY Post. Thus, I doubt that’s the reason she is off.

Thus, my guess is that her medical leave is based on either:
1. The foot injury;
or
2. Adjustment difficulties related to her transition (ie a mental health issue) and if this is the reason then it doesn’t matter if she has real giant boobs or not because if she believes that she has non-existent boobs that would be consistent with an adjustment disorder/mental health issue.

Either way, I don’t anticipate a doctor will be inspecting Lemieux’ boobs any time soon and, if I was going to bet on the cause of the medical leave my money would be on the foot injury.
I really doubt it's the foot injury---LOL Busty Lemieux is just a scam artist!! The HDSB is so tired of this controversy, that they just told him to stay home. The stupid HDSB should have taken Howard Levitt's advice. Howard Levitt is the best employment lawyer in Canada, and get's paid over $1000/hr.

Also, Busty seemed to be walking pretty good, in that recent New York post video.


 
Last edited:

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
7,371
3,523
113
Dress codes are really difficult because you have two choices and both can be fucked with if someone deliberately wants to fuck with them.

One - list EVERYTHING you think needs to be there, or otherwise put some very serious limitations.
This has the problem that people mostly hate it if it is too restrictive (everyone in a uniform) and it almost always means something gets left out, because you can't think of everything. Then someone who wants to fuck with it just works to the loopholes and you have to deal with shit all over again.

Two - go for some vague general sense like "professional", "appropriate", and so on.
This has the problem that it isn't strictly defined so you can end up with fights over what is appropriate or not and why.

The simple fact is that if someone is determined to fuck with the system and dares you to crack down on them, you can't do much about it. Either crack down on them and face the backlash (either in public or the lawsuit) or ignore them and deal with them giving a fuck you to the code.
This problem traces back to the fact that somehow the HDSB has no dress code policy whatsoever at this time; and they can’t simply impose one in the midst of collective bargaining.

I don’t think Lemieux could pass any dress code of any sort in any organization anywhere; but if an organization has nothing whatsoever in place then this is what can happen.
 

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
7,371
3,523
113
I really doubt it's the foot injury---LOL Busty Lemieux is just a scam artist!! The HDSB is so tired of this controversy, that they just told him to stay home. The stupid HDSB should have taken Howard Levitt's advice. Howard Levitt is the best employment lawyer in Canada, and get's paid over $1000/hr.

Also, Busty seemed to be walking pretty good, in that recent New York post video.


LOL…You just want to know if the boobs are real. Like…we all know they’re probably not; but…hypothetically speaking…what if they actually are REAL???

I wanna know too…not gonna lie.
😳
 

mellowjello

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2017
2,680
1,190
113
Who?
Who has characterized that?

People have certainly characterized the whipped up media panic as anti-trans.
Is this all you have to contribute at this point?
You're not reading posts closely enough, I guess because pointing fingers and making baseless accusations
takes up most of your time.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,700
60,776
113
This problem traces back to the fact that somehow the HDSB has no dress code policy whatsoever at this time; and they can’t simply impose one in the midst of collective bargaining.

I don’t think Lemieux could pass any dress code of any sort in any organization anywhere; but if an organization has nothing whatsoever in place then this is what can happen.
I hadn't realized they were in the middle of collective bargaining. I can see how that made them extra cautious in dealing with anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,700
60,776
113
Is this all you have to contribute at this point?
You're not reading posts closely enough, I guess because pointing fingers and making baseless accusations
takes up most of your time.
Dude.
Who has said actions against this person would be anti-Trans?

We've said the right wing freakout about it is anti-Trans. Because it is.

But has anyone said that firing this person for any reason would be anti-Trans?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
Dude.
Who has said actions against this person would be anti-Trans?

We've said the right wing freakout about it is anti-Trans. Because it is.

But has anyone said that firing this person for any reason would be anti-Trans?
And you know who else is really freaking out about LGBTQ and trans?

Exposed: Dallas Humber, Narrator Of Neo-Nazi ‘Terrorgram,’ Promoter Of Mass Shootings
Her propaganda canonized white supremacist murderers as "saints." She may have helped inspire a shooting at a gay bar. Now she's been unmasked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

mellowjello

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2017
2,680
1,190
113
The one thing that the board could have done is transferred them to a different school or assigned them to special needs students or some class where they'd be out of the spotlight.
Which makes me think that the drag thing only happened occasionally or else the right wing anger threads would be flooded with discussions about different outfits they wore each day.
The board has been very quiet about the entire thing, good on them. They've also kept it so that the right wing took months to figure out who the teacher was, if they were still working and what their name was.
Good on the board.
Your obsession with right wingers is off the charts, you think you've got it all figured out down to the specific motivations.
Your obsession with this right vs. left model is blinding you to anything else that might give you a broader perspective.
You can't see it, the same way some far right dude is closed off.
The only thing you both have in common is you think you know it all, if someone doesn't agree with you,
it's an assault by the other camp.
 

mellowjello

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2017
2,680
1,190
113
We've said the right wing freakout about it is anti-Trans. Because it is.
No, and that looks like a real back pedal.
You've been accusing anyone freaking out about this as being right wing and anti Trans.
So back to a question I've put out a number of times and gets ignored, are there no non right wingers out there freaking
out about this? If so, are they anti Trans?
How do you come to a conclusion about who's left or right based on where they stand on this issue specifically?
 
Last edited:

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
Your obsession with right wingers is off the charts, you think you've got it all figured out down to the specific motivations.
Your obsession with this right vs. left model is blinding you to anything else that might give you a broader perspective.
You can't see it, the same way some far right dude is closed off.
The only thing you both have in common is you think you know it all, if someone doesn't agree with you,
it's an assault by the other camp.
The way you seem to think you know it all and know me?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,700
60,776
113
No, and that looks like a real back pedal.
You've been accusing anyone freaking out about this as being right wing and anti Trans.
Show me.

So back to a question I've put out a number of times and gets ignored, are there no non right wingers out there freaking
out about this? If so, are they anti Trans?
How do you come to a conclusion about who's left or right based on where they stand on this issue specifically?
I have no idea what non-right wingers are freaking out about this. You keep showing right wing media freaking out about it.

Are there non-right wingers who think this person is being unprofessional and that there should be a sensible dress code that is broadly inclusive?
I'm sure there are.
I think that's a perfectly reasonable position to take.
It's also not a freak out.
 
Toronto Escorts