It's all identity politics in the ideological straightjacket. If you're against Boobs Lemieux, you're anti trans righty. If you want to take your son to the strip joint, you're a redneck righty, but if you put on a trans show at school, you're a good lefty. If you question climate agenda, you're anti science righty. But, if you dismiss biology and insist that men can get pregnant, you're a woke lefty. Above all- you can question Boobs Lemieux's motivations because his actions are bad optics, but "she's" hardly alone, just extra large.
Oakville teacher wears huge prosthetic breasts to shop class
- Thread starter curr3n_c1000
- Start date
You realize that you live in a fantasy world, JC. Most "lefties" on this board think that Boobs is a rightie troll. It's got SFA to do with actual trans rights. I went to the Rail and other strip joints literally 100's of times. And you call me a leftie.
Similar with the rest of the sad nonsense you just wrote.
He's still pretty blah looking. He's just not as pudgy. Who is this dude anyway?
read again- re. strip joint.
Did you take your kid with you?
It's a fully dressed little girl dancing while her mom and other women clap. What's wrong with you?read again- re. strip joint.
Last edited:
I see that Twitter is doing great.read again- re. strip joint.
Twitter is killing it.
Makes a nice change from the usual news about them.
Twitter "insiders" tell BBC that child porn, hate material and state-sponsored disinformation "thriving" under Musk
Related
www.instagram.com
Joseph Chantry on Instagram: "🤯 Repost from: @emilysavesamerica _____________ #money #cash #business #success #realestate #investing #mentor #finance #personalfinance #landlord #selfimprovement #selfhelp #personaldevelopement #book #author #winning #selfpublished #fourplex #economy #triplex #multifamily #duplex #entrepreneur #goldbullion #silverbullion #rentalproperty #passiveincome"
151K likes, 5,943 comments - your_first_million on March 6, 2023: "🤯 Repost from: @emilysavesamerica _____________ #money #cash #business #success #realestate #investing #mentor #finance #personalfinance #landlord #selfimprovement #selfhelp #personaldevelopement #book #author #winning...
www.instagram.com
Anyone who has had responsibility for these issues in the real world would be undeterred by the lack of "certainty" as to how the policy should be drafted, and whether anyone will try to test its limits. It's not possible to be "certain" how an arbitrator will react to every aspect of the policy. You won't even know who the arbitrator will be until a grievance goes forward to arbitration, and every arbitrator is likely to have slightly different views. As a result, you draft the policy to prohibit everything that could negatively affect the learning environment, and you let an arbitrator decide if the policy needs to be refined, and how. Policies are organic. They change and adapt over time and in response to legal rulings. That is no reason to shy away from the task at hand. The focus needs to be put back on education in Lemieux's classroom, in the school, and in the school board as a whole.
812 posts on a useless subject, you guys are easily titillated. Let's move to something more important.
Yes, you can't draft a perfect code that avoids all problems.
Some will just not draft a code at all because they think it is obvious teachers won't want to fuck with that kind of thing and an unspoken agreement will do. (After all, lots of people believe that over regulating something is bad.) This might bite them in the ass. Or they will draft a code and someone will use its loopholes against them. Thus drafting a code will bite them in the ass.
Pick your poison.
I didn't know you read Arabic Twitter pages that posted about pedophilia, JC.
That's my point. Again, you can't shirk your responsibility for the education of children because your draft code may get picked at by an arbitrator. That kind of dithering is not management material.
To illustrate the point by comparison to another employment decision - do you know why companies fire employees when they know they don't have just cause and are probably going to end up paying significant severance? Answer - because that employee is doing so much harm to the business, replacing them is worth the cost. Likewise here, except I think this problem ends with a policy. Lemieux won't bet his job on defying the policy. He'll cook up some form of mental health leave and file a grievance over the policy. Teachers unions have no balls (they aren't reall unions - they never had to organize anyone - statute granted them bargaining rights), so they'll go through the theatre of pursuing the grievance, and everyone will know it's theatre, including the arbitrator.
Last edited:
I don't think anyone is holding up the school board here as the paragons of management material.
I am just pointing out that the original decision not to have a dress code isn't some mysterious abdication of authority.
Crafting one in the middle of potential lawsuits is even more fraught. (Especially if there is an actual collective bargaining negotiation going on, which some people have said but I haven't verified.)
Totally agree.
Sometimes you have to make the call and take one hit to reduce the other hit.
To you, this may seem obvious, but unless you are intimately involved in their business, I don't know if I should believe your analysis.
I sure as hell don't know what their actual situation is.
They seem to think waiting this out is the better strategy.
There is a good chance they are wrong.
You are welcome to make whatever guess you want.
This isn't about this one teacher, its part of a larger campaign against LGBTQ, trans and women's rights.
GOP trolling about a ban on "transgenderism" reveals genocidal intent
Republicans are competing for attention by ratcheting up anti-LGBTQ speech. The inevitable result is violence
www.salon.com
