Sexy Friends Toronto

Oakville teacher wears huge prosthetic breasts to shop class

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
22,311
8,687
113
I don’t think they support her; I think they are afraid of being sued by her.

I’m sure the board wishes she would just go away; which is probably what will happen at the end of this year.
Watching the meeting on you tube last night, every member of the HDSB seemed quite irritated---LOL Knowing how "woke" the HDSB is; they'll probably allow her to teach again in September 2023??
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
Pretty much, yes.

The parents/community can have “input” but the HDSB makes the final decision.

I also saw an article earlier in this thread that the HDSB is bringing in an outside consultant to review the dress code policy. This sounds like another stalling tactic to me; they are just going to keep stringing the trustees along until the end of the semester. I’m not saying I agree with this but it looks to me like that’s what they’re doing.
Yes, the consultant will tell Boobs to blunt the pokies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
22,311
8,687
113
Pretty much, yes.

The parents/community can have “input” but the HDSB makes the final decision. I assume that the HDSB would usually do what the trustees ask them to but in this instance they are saying no and the trustees are furious.

I also saw an article earlier in this thread that the HDSB is bringing in an outside consultant to review the dress code policy. This sounds like another stalling tactic to me; they are just going to keep stringing the trustees along until the end of the semester. I’m not saying I agree with this but it looks to me like that’s what they’re doing.
Like I just posted, they'll probably allow her to teach again in September 2023??
 

Frank Fingers

Active member
Jun 6, 2009
383
33
28
The Halton school board should’ve cracked down hard on this dude from the very beginning. But as usual, everyone is afraid of the hurting some losers feelings.

Once the NY Post showed him walking outside of school dressed as his normal male self, this attention seeking loser knew his time was up. Good riddance. I hope he’s never allowed to teach again.

I feel sorry for the students who were threatened with suspension if they took pictures of this clown. He was asking for attention from the beginning so if he’s allowed to dress/act like that, then he should deal with the consequences like the man he truly is!
 

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
7,371
3,523
113
What about this article, that I posted??

You’re right. It says right in the article that you have to be female to have gigantomastia. I can’t find any reports of it in men who are transitioning to women.

However, Lemieux claims that she was born “intersex” so then if she is partially female could she be a rare medical exception having an extreme reaction to estrogen treatment? It’s possible, no?

LOL…I am sceptical that any of this is actually true…but it can’t be ruled out, I guess?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
7,371
3,523
113
Like I just posted, they'll probably allow her to teach again in September 2023??
I recall reading somewhere that she was leaving the province at the end of this year…but I think it was based off a rumour on Reddit so who knows? I doubt she’ll be back, though, but it’s impossible to know?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
7,371
3,523
113
I don't, but you said you did.
"All the anti-trans activists and their Right Wing friends in parliament will need to find new targets for their bomb threats."
You still stand by it?
Yes. What part of what I said is not true?

Is there something you would like to get off your chest? Speak freely…we are all friends here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
7,371
3,523
113
How do you know that's true?
Because Lemieux is not there anymore so they have nothing to complain about. The problem has been removed.

Are you truly having this much difficulty understanding a simple statement? Or is there something else bothering you? Maybe you will feel better if you turn yourself in to the police?
 

mellowjello

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2017
2,680
1,190
113
Because Lemieux is not there anymore so they have nothing to complain about. The problem has been removed.

Are you truly having this much difficulty understanding a simple statement? Or is there something else bothering you? Maybe you will feel better if you turn yourself in to the police?
How do you know it's anti trans activists and right wingers?
How do you know that for certain?
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,546
88,202
113
Yes, but the HDSB had 6 months to do something. They did nothing!!
What they need to do is get Queens Park to enact a provision in the Human Rights Code to remove any arguable protections for egregiously freaky attire and presentation. So again this appears to be Duggo.

The school board doesn't get to re write provincial legislation.

The Titty Teacher apparently told everyone that his own man-moobs went haywire over his "estrogen shots" and grew at an alarming rate until they sagged to his belly. Presumably it took time to research that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,546
88,202
113
I guess you're right. However, their lawyers seem to have a much different opinion than Howard Levitt. Even one of the parents brought up Levitt's NP article, in the delegation part, of last night's meeting.
Lawyers have differing opinions and Levitt may have been grandstanding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,546
88,202
113
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,328
5,428
113
And what's the dress code gonna do? All Boobs has to say is that it's a body image issue and the Board will fold. That's why he is still being paid because firing him opens up the Board to the wrongful dismissal suit and discrimination charges. They don't want to set the precedent of firing someone claiming to be trans.
Agreed. I mean, why is the board dragging their heels on this. I can only surmise they are worried about the wrongful dismissal aspect, or a human rights tribunal. Again, I still wonder if this person was facing disciplinary action or something like that, and took up the Kayla Lemiuex persona to make it that much harder for the board to axe them....

I mean, right from the get go, this whole story was odd. I highly doubt that 99% of people who are Trans or whatever, would put on something like the grotesquely huge fake tits. It just reeks of publicity seeking or thumbing the nose at rules and regulations. Is this performance art designed to show how (perceived) silly some of the accommodation rules are?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,328
5,428
113
What they need to do is get Queens Park to enact a provision in the Human Rights Code to remove any arguable protections for egregiously freaky attire and presentation. So again this appears to be Duggo.

The school board doesn't get to re write provincial legislation.

The Titty Teacher apparently told everyone that his own man-moobs went haywire over his "estrogen shots" and grew at an alarming rate until they sagged to his belly. Presumably it took time to research that.
Not a lawyer, but could this type of law survive a Supreme Court challenge? Sort of like the right for women to go topless...

And, you can't legislate against someone with giant boobs. There are women who do have massive, legit mammaries. No matter what they do, they likely can't hide those sweater blimps unless they opt for reduction surgery (and seriously, who would want tits that big? Imagine trying to run. Or buy a shirt/sweater/dress).
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,996
2,483
113
What they need to do is get Queens Park to enact a provision in the Human Rights Code to remove any arguable protections for egregiously freaky attire and presentation. So again this appears to be Duggo.

The school board doesn't get to re write provincial legislation.

The Titty Teacher apparently told everyone that his own man-moobs went haywire over his "estrogen shots" and grew at an alarming rate until they sagged to his belly. Presumably it took time to research that.
Labour arbitrators may be liberal minded for the most part, but not so much so that they wouldn't enforce a school dress code that prevented the wearing of prosthetic breasts, except to replace breasts that have been surgically altered or removed for medical reasons. This joker is not going to be able to produce a doctor to testify at an arbitration hearing that this guy needs to wear his halloween costume for his mental health. Even a liberal arbitrator is going to have disdain for the mockery this guy's behaviour presents. His behaviour is actually an obstacle for genuinely trans individuals who want to present as a credible woman that this guy is intentionally presenting a caricature, thereby sexualizing the classroom environment.

There is no need to amend the Human Rights Code. The case will be heard at arbitration, if ever at all.

The school board is ducking their responsibility here.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

mellowjello

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2017
2,680
1,190
113
Not a lawyer, but could this type of law survive a Supreme Court challenge? Sort of like the right for women to go topless...

And, you can't legislate against someone with giant boobs. There are women who do have massive, legit mammaries. No matter what they do, they likely can't hide those sweater blimps unless they opt for reduction surgery (and seriously, who would want tits that big? Imagine trying to run. Or buy a shirt/sweater/dress).
He's not a woman first of all.
Secondly, a woman wouldn't be able to function, much less walk around with tits like that, it would never be an issue to this extent.
I know women with a fraction of those tits that had to get reductions because they couldn't cope.
And there are codes against dressing provocatively.
Should I be able to just shove a massive eggplant or zucchini down the tightest jeans I could wear and parade around in a professional environment, especially around young students?

Bomb threats may seam drastic, but l applaud whoever it was, to get some semblance of sanity back in that school while the powers that be, hem and haw and split the the most minute legal hairs.

If the law can't protect me from threat of harm, I'm taking the law into my own hands. If boards won't dictate and enforce some kind of standards when it comes to this stuff, especially in a student environment, same principal applies in my opinion.
 
Toronto Escorts