p.s. And yes, I do agree with Canada's definition of Kach as a terrorist entity. Even if I wasn't sure, I figure CSIS and the other intelligence agencies know more than I do. If Canada ever defines the IDF as a terrorist entity, I'll happily condemn them. Sadly you will continue to only describe things as terrorism if it fits your political crusade.
The term terrorism is used mostly to justify committing more war crimes, like the US and Israel do, calling people 'terrorists' to justify assassinations, drone attacks and bombings.
Your use of the term is a good example, you used to refuse to use the term on states or armies, saying its not terrorism or at best its state terrorism.
But in order to justify more warmongering, you decided that its now ok to label countries, armies and leaders as terrorism.
So now you're stuck, since clearly the label fits Israel much better than it does Iran.
Just as you're stuck now that B'teselem has labelled Israel apartheid, its so bad that in the week or two since the report has come out you have totally refused to address it.
When it was the UN, you declared it a report by dictators, even though you now cheer for alliances with those same countries as the US sells them weapons in exchange for diplomacy.
When it was South Africa, you said it doesn't count.
But now that its Israel's leading human rights organization declaring their own country apartheid, you can't even discuss it.