Bottom line: Sweden (no lockdown) is the winner. UK, Spain, Italy, Belgium are the losersBottom line: Sweden (no lockdown) is the loser. Denmark (lockdown) is the winner

Bottom line: Sweden (no lockdown) is the winner. UK, Spain, Italy, Belgium are the losersBottom line: Sweden (no lockdown) is the loser. Denmark (lockdown) is the winner
That doesnt explain why explain why Spain, Belgium and UK have less elderly people and yet a higher death rate than SwedenThe only thing that is a failure is your comprehension skills
Comprehension:
noun
The action or capability of understanding something
Those are not the only differences, now go re read and understand what they are and come back.
Why am I not surprised that you can't figure out the number of elderly people in Italy Vs Sweden is significantly higher. One has got to be completely clueless if one views it as only a 3% difference and one can not see the significant difference in population which is a significant contributing factor.
Like I said you must have lived an extremely uninformed life in Europe if these important and known facts were and still are unbeknownst to you.
Here it is for you.
Population over 65 years old
-----Sweden--------------------------------Italy
-----2,000,000+---------------------------13,500,000+
Italy has more elderly people than Sweden has population
Now go and try to do the math to understand the significant difference in age between the 2 countries
You're not looking at the whole graph from when the pandemic first started, smartypants. Try againThe only thing that is a failure is your comprehension skills
Comprehension:
noun
The action or capability of understanding something
Those are not the only differences, now go re read and understand what they are and come back.
Why am I not surprised that you can't figure out the number of elderly people in Italy Vs Sweden is significantly higher. One has got to be completely clueless if one views it as only a 3% difference and one can not see the significant difference in population which is a significant contributing factor.
Like I said you must have lived an extremely uninformed life in Europe if these important and known facts were and still are unbeknownst to you.
Here it is for you.
Population over 65 years old
-----Sweden--------------------------------Italy
-----2,000,000+---------------------------13,500,000+
Italy has more elderly people than Sweden has population
Now go and try to do the math to understand the significant difference in age between the 2 countries.
The fact that you look at the above numbers and still view it as a downward trend is absolutely ingenious on your part and mind boggling to others.
Here is a hint, Your drawn line across the graph needs be a lot shorter.
Again let me repeat this for you the number of cases in Sweden has risen sharply from September 1st. Which means an upward trend
Sweden 7 day average:
September 1st----------162
October 20th-------------818
I already explained that to you, when you have almost no deaths that means virtually all new infections are young people. The more young people you infect, the faster you build up herd immunity because they dont tend to get sick (or get sick a lot less), therefore they are out in bars, schools, restaurants......etc on a daily basis infecting even more young people.You still haven't been able to logically explain that meanwhile the rate of transmission in both Sweden and Denmark is very similar you view Denmark to be in a 2nd wave yet you view Sweden's number of cases on a downward trend?
Please also do explain how you originally thought the reduced number of deaths was proof of herd immunity?
That doesnt explain why explain why Spain, Belgium and UK have less elderly people and yet a higher death rate than Sweden
![]()
You're not looking at the whole graph from when the pandemic first started, smartypants. Try again![]()
The fact that you consistently fail to read and understand yet you reply back with more nonsense. Also the fact that instead of comparing Sweden to it's Nordic bordering neighbours Denmark, Finland, Norway who they have more similarities with you keep comparing them to others is self explanatory.I already explained that to you, when you have almost no deaths that means virtually all new infections are young people. The more young people you infect, the faster you build up herd immunity because they dont tend to get sick (or get sick a lot less), therefore they are out in bars, schools, restaurants......etc on a daily basis infecting even more young people.
But you need a certain level of intellect to understand this, and its clear you dont have that
No its not self explanatory. You just enjoy pulling shit out of your ass and passing it on as factsThe fact that you consistently fail to read and understand yet you reply back with more nonsense. Also the fact that instead of comparing Sweden to it's Nordic bordering neighbours Denmark, Finland, Norway who they have more similarities with you keep comparing them to others is self explanatory
I did. They're still bullshitNow like I said in the previous post "Those are not the only differences, now go re read and understand what they are and come back."
Here's another hint. The 2nd Swedish wave is considerably smaller than the first one.Looking at the Sweden graph one would have to be completely oblivious to the numbers and unaware of how graphs and trends work to assume the numbers are still in a downward trend.
Here is the hint again. Your drawn line across the graph needs be a lot shorter to distinguish when the downward trend ended. Sweden has been in an upward trend since the beginning of September.
Like I said you have a lack understanding of everything. That’s why you look at the graph and see a downward trend meanwhile Sweden has actually seen an upward trend since the beginning of SeptemberNo its not self explanatory. You just enjoy pulling shit out of your ass and passing it on as facts
I did. They're still bullshit
Here's another hint. The 2nd Swedish wave is considerably smaller than the first one.
Thats a fact. This proves that less people are getting infected
Oh I understand it perfectly. I countered your dumb argument that Italy had more elderly people, but then you fail to explain away why countries like UK and Spain have less elderly citizens, and yet they still have a higher infection rate per capita than Sweden.Like I said you have a lack understanding of everything. That’s why you look at the graph and see a downward trend meanwhile Sweden has actually seen an upward trend since the beginning of September
That’s also why you think the elderly population in Italy Vs Sweden is not a big difference and only understand it as a 3% difference and not the population, meanwhile in reality the difference is over 11,000,000 people which is larger than Sweden’s population.
It’s clear where your getting your facts from.
Now post another picture of your European passport as that in your mind gives you credence to your non factual posts.
Sorry I didn't see a passport picture in one of your recent posts so I forgot.Oh I understand it perfectly. I countered your dumb argument that Italy had more elderly people, but then you fail to explain away why countries like UK and Spain have less elderly citizens, and yet they still have a higher infection rate per capita than Sweden.
And Spain locked down, while Sweden didnt. So your argument once again falls apart.
And me living in Europe for 15 years does indeed give me a much better perspective than someone who's lived in Scarborough all their life![]()
Nah, lockdowns were a success:Bottom line: Sweden (no lockdown) is the winner. UK, Spain, Italy, Belgium are the losers
They're the winner because they're only 4th worst?Bottom line: Sweden (no lockdown) is the winner. UK, Spain, Italy, Belgium are the losers
...
Sweden just re adjusted the number of cases for the week, as per usual for them to do. Oct 21 was originally listed at 1,206 new casesp.s. Sweden's daily case count is almost as high as the first wave. Obviously your claims about herd immunity are complete bullshit.
You guys love to compare Sweden to just 3 countries as well (Denmark, Finland and Norway), but when I compare Sweden to 4 other EU countries suddenly you claim that doesnt prove anything. Thats hypocrisy at its finestThey're the winner because they're only 4th worst?
The fact that you omitted most of the countries that are doing much better says a lot.
Too small of a sample sizeIn case people want to understand this is what a downward trend really looks like
Oct 7---------831
Oct 8---------835
Oct 9---------783
Oct 10-------509
Oct 11-------161
Oct 12-------637
Oct 13-------916
Oct 14-------968
Oct 15-------904
Oct 16-------1180
Oct 17-------698
Oct 18-------321
Oct 19-------771
Oct 20-------1293
Oct 21-------1206
Of course there is also the 7 day average showing the downward trend as well
Sept 1--------162
Oct 21--------911
Thanks for the complimentThe same person who is so knowledgeable and insightful about facts
Do you have a link to an official government statistics site that backs up these claims?? Or are you just assuming all this??Nah, lockdowns were a success:
What is obviously clear is due to lockdowns:
1) serious vehicular accidents & deaths are way way down
2) flu deaths & serious complications have decreased tremendously
3) C-19 ill health & deaths are far less due to the lockdowns
4) likewise probably other communicable diseases (e.g. tuberculosis, HIV) have been greatly reduced by the extreme safety measures in place
5) street crimes have probably been highly reduced.
6) families have been able to spend more time together enjoying each others company while free from the slavery of that 4 letter word "work" that the vast majority hate. Giving more time for quality of life activities like sex & various entertainments.
7) abortions (child murder) are probably down.
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread...1#post13211637
But hardly anybody is dying. Only 4 deaths in the last week or so.p.s. Sweden's daily case count is almost as high as the first wave. Obviously your claims about herd immunity are complete bullshit.
Road deaths are down 70% – but is there a plan to keep them low?Do you have a link to an official government statistics site that backs up these claims?? Or are you just assuming all this??