Wait, you didnt say a cough or a sneeze, you said a "breath".
So you just agreed with me that exhaled breath can infect others, thereby making masks useless.
Thanks bro!!
Some masks better than others
- Thread starter Phil C. McNasty
- Start date
So you just agreed with me that exhaled breath can infect others, thereby making masks useless.
Thanks bro!!
And wearing a mask while doing so would greatly reduce the amount of particulate matter.And shack agrees with me too. This is awesome!!
Go take a cold shower! You need it!!!Wait, you didnt say a cough or a sneeze, you said a "breath".
So you just agreed with me that exhaled breath can infect others, thereby making masks useless.
Thanks bro!!
The mask will stop much of the infected particles and both people wearing masks pretty much seals the deal.
ps....don't forget to wash your ass during the cold showers so the ladies stop complaining after your visits!
I dont wash my ass for 2 weeks, then when I see an SP and she asks for my Terb handle I tell hers its squeezer
They would only help if you're coughing or sneezing large droplets.
But even thats debatable because droplets come out of your mouth or nose at 37 degrees C (body temperature).
A small droplet will evaporate within 30 to 60 seconds studies have shown.
That droplet will then evaporate into the air and still contaminate the air around you.
It doesnt just disappear, it has to go somewhere
LMAO, that's a good one, I'll give you that one but just remember, there is only one Squeezer and the ladies will know you're an imposter with a dirty ass!!!!!
On the second note,I will disagree with you as usual. If both individuals are wearing masks the chance of transmitting the virus is reduced a lot, not 100% but definitely helps not too mention should also diminish the viral load.
Last edited:
That would depend on how contagious coronavirus is, and too little is known about this virus at this time.
If even a tiny amount of microscopic droplets is enough to infect someone then it doesnt matter much because you breathe out 12 times in 1 minute, which should be more than enough to infect someone who's standing beside you in a grocery store
Again you show how little knowledge you have about the virus and how it works, just because a person is standing next to someone at a grocery store does not mean one will get infected. There are so many other factors that are extremely important to the exposure of COVID-19, duration of time, distance, viral load taken in.......It most certainly does reduce their exposure to the virus if they are wearing a mask.
For e.g. if there are two people one with mask and the other without, standing next to another person with COVID, being the same distance apart, for the same duration of time, exposed to the same amount of COVID-19, the one without a mask is exposed to more of the virus.
There is a lot more known about the Coronavirus than you know that is for sure..........and you are confusing the two.
e.g. masks work regardless of how many times you claim they don't. Any use of mask is better than no use of mask and that's a fact.
Not that I expect you to understand any of the above.
Last edited:
Not unless that mask is tightly sealed and doesnt allow for much air to escape.
Not that I expect you to understand that though
WOW Thank you for that ingenious post .
But quite different than your previous non factual posts downplaying masks.
You are all missing the real point: All Lives Aren't Equal. We all know that women of childbearing age are way more valuable than men of similar age. One man can impregnate as many women as presented to him. Whereas women have a finite number of children they can bear.WOW Thank you for that ingenious post .
But quite different than your previous non factual posts downplaying masks.
So with all this hysteria about masks saving lives, whose lives are we trying to save and whose do we not? Do we really think the lives of people over 65 are worth more than people's lives under 25? Do we think senior citizens are the future of humanity? Should we try to protect Boomers from looming death while traumatizing and stunting the growth of people under 25? I say, fuck the Boomers. We need to start living again. Heck, there will even be a glut of available real estate if this happens.
Last edited:
To be safe staying at home i'd have to also kick irresponsible "young, dumb & full of cum" covidiots out to the street or dog house to live.
Hopefully the C-19 police will pick them up & lock them in solitary quarantine somewhere where they cannot harm other members of civilized society.
Acting responsibly does not equate to living in fear but living sensibly, cautiously & longer than fools.
Enjoy your "lives" in the dog house!
Or, in your case, solitary confinement at Alcatraz.
Says the guy in fear re all kinds of imaginary conspiracy nut-job notions.
Enjoy your non obstructed breathing all alone in Alcatraz! Your food tray will be shoved through a hole under the door.
Alcatraz?? Seriously! Never realized the high number of cranky grandpa's on this site. Last prisoner left in 1963. 57 years ago!
Arguably the world considers younger lives less valuable than old ones. Just considering the tens of millions of abortions in recent decades. And all the hungry, starving, or starved to death children.
Who has more value, a 70 year old with a lifetime full of knowledge & wisdom to enlighten the younger, or a toddler. Often the old people are our leaders in government, the sciences, arts, etc. They have a lot to give. What does a child or teen have to offer besides being a burden on society in need of care, training, feeding, etc. If they die how hard is it to fuck and make some more.
Moreover it's not just the old that are at risk of death and other C-19 problems:
"I was infected with coronavirus in March, six months on I’m still unwell
Charlie Russell, 27, is one of an estimated 600,000 people with post-Covid illness, a condition that may give an insight into ME
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...m-still-unwell
Many kids & young people's lives have already been saved due to the worldwide lockdowns.
Because motor vehicle accident deaths are the #1 leading worldwide cause of death in such.
"Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for U.S. teens."
https://www.google.com/search?q=lead...hrome&ie=UTF-8
"Each year, 1.35 million people are killed on roadways around the world.4
"...Road traffic injuries are estimated to be the eighth leading cause of death globally for all age groups and the leading cause of death for children and young people 5–29 years of age. More people now die in road traffic crashes than from HIV/AIDS.4"
https://www.cdc.gov/injury/features/...nd%20cyclists.
What is obviously clear is due to the lockdowns & safety measures:
1) serious vehicular accidents & deaths are way way down
2) flu deaths & serious complications have decreased tremendously
3) C-19 ill health & deaths are far less due to the lockdowns
4) likewise probably other communicable diseases (e.g. tuberculosis, HIV) have been greatly reduced by the extreme safety measures in place
5) street crimes have probably been highly reduced.
6) families have been able to spend more time together enjoying each others company while free from the slavery of that 4 letter word "work" that the vast majority hate. Giving more time for quality of life activities like sex & various entertainments.
7) abortions (child murder) are probably down.
http://www.therxforum.com/showthread...1#post13211637
I'd suggest it's time to reopen Alcatraz & create many new Alcatraz's worldwide!
I'll suggest employing many thousands of the unemployed as C-19 rule enforcement officers. Get people back to work & kill the virus at the same time via enforcement. Kill two birds with one stone. Maybe even start with $1000 fines for first offences, or arrest & jail the covidiots. Hotels could be used for jailing purposes if the "accommodations" become full elsewhere. That could put hotel staff back to work rather than receiving free government payouts for doing nothing.
This is by far one of the most ridiculous and nonsensicle posts I've read, and it explains so much about you, it also has absolutely nothing to do with if masks work.
Bravo to you for reaching new high standards of ignorant and selfish post.
No one should even attempt to ignorantly argue how we should be making policies that are geared towards the free spirited nature of the younger generation while at the same time fully ignoring the health of the elderly as well as others who are in high risk health categories. But here you are.
We live in a country that has a good quality of life and that comes with respect for the elderly's health and providing a good quality of life for them as well as those who are in a higher health risk category.
If you want to be able to afford real estate get a better job or work more rather than wanting the elderly to die so there might be the possibility of an influx of real estate. Again as I've said people like you have these views out of ignorance, or out of selfish wants, and at times it's a combination of both which it is in your case.
Trying to ignorantly question which group of people we should gear our policies toward, when the smallest act of putting on a mask by all for the greater good of our communities is so easy to do and would be significantly better for our economy in the long run (I can't explain that yet to you when you still haven't understood the basics of putting on a mask is important in fighting the Coronavirus) is as ignorant as it gets. But hey posts like yours are on par with the "Stable Genius" crowd.
Really makes you wonder why they picked Guantanamo Bay for a terrorist prison instead of retrofitting a perfectly good prison - that was actually empty on an island. Would have created more local jobs too. Local jobs for young people.
