Saudi Arabia financed a dry run of 9/11 in 1999

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,833
113
...
Over the last few years there has been very little Palestinian 'terrorism',
And it is so obviously hypocritical that in the same thread you condemn Saudi funding of terror you attempt to whitewash the almost continual terrorism they fund against Israel.


Even you, when trying to show how evil Palestinians are
And as usual you can't win an argument with actual facts so you outright lie about other people's views. Palestinians aren't evil. Hamas, Fatah's armed wing, and several other Palestinian groups sure as hell are terrorists groups though. That's not my opinion but the official stance of Canada.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,818
22,892
113
And it is so obviously hypocritical that in the same thread you condemn Saudi funding of terror you attempt to whitewash the almost continual terrorism they fund against Israel.
So you think Saudi are funding terrorism in Palestine as well as funding the 9/11 attacks yet still think Afghanistan was the correct target because they rented them training space?
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,833
113
Once you average in the West Bank and Gaza to Israel's rating its about the same.
...
You are obviously a failure at math too. Israel is 80% free and that includes 1.5 million Arab citizens of Israel. The Palestinian territories are between 12 and 27% free depending on how you want to average. Any way you want to average it it is way above Iran and Saudi.

Saudi Arabia is rated worse than Hamas run Gaza. The fact that even Gaza is rated as more free than Saudi Arabia speaks volumes.

p.s. You might want to read those reports to see how much blame they place on Hamas or the PA - something you have never been willing to do.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,833
113
So you think Saudi are funding terrorism in Palestine as well as funding the 9/11 attacks yet still think Afghanistan was the correct target because they rented them training space?
I think Saudi and Iranian funding of terrorism deserves sanctions. Western governments are continually sanctioning groups that raise money for terrorist organizations like Hamas.

Meanwhile the actual guys who planned 9/11 were located in Afghanistan with full support of their government. Do you really think the US should have invaded Saudi Arabia to punish guys who had fled from the Saudi authorities? I know you don't want to look at it but AQ and their leadership are/were actively hunted in Saudi Arabia.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,818
22,892
113
You are obviously a failure at math too. Israel is 80% free and that includes 1.5 million Arab citizens of Israel. The Palestinian territories are between 12 and 27% free depending on how you want to average. Any way you want to average it it is way above Iran and Saudi.
Lets check your math.
The number of Jewish citizens is now equal or less then the number of Palestinian 'refugee's' and Arab 'citizens' living under Israeli rule.
http://forward.com/news/breaking-ne...-pass-jews-by-2017-in-israel-and-territories/

So when you weight that 80% with 20% (average of your two numbers) you end up with a freedom index of 50% for those living under Israeli rule.
Not so shining any more.

Not that Freedom Houses metrics are that unbiased in any event, but even by your best choice Israel is not looking great.

And again, neither Saudi Arabia or Iran currently runs an apartheid rule or runs anything like the Gaza strip, which Save the Children just declared 'unliveable'.
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2...onditions-gaza-unlivable-one-million-children
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,818
22,892
113
I think Saudi and Iranian funding of terrorism deserves sanctions. Western governments are continually sanctioning groups that raise money for terrorist organizations like Hamas.
I'd agree and Israel should be put on that list as well for apartheid.

Meanwhile the actual guys who planned 9/11 were located in Afghanistan with full support of their government. Do you really think the US should have invaded Saudi Arabia to punish guys who had fled from the Saudi authorities? I know you don't want to look at it but AQ and their leadership are/were actively hunted in Saudi Arabia.
According to the news reports the Saudi government financed and helped organize the dry run on 9/11. That's way more active support then letting AQ train in the backwaters of Afghanistan.
Bin Laden was hated by some Saudis and supported by others.

Even at worst the Afghanis just let AQ train on their land, funding the dry run of 9/11 is way more active a role.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,833
113
I'd agree ...
Funny. You've spent a lot of time making excuses for Iran and Hamas.

And as you showed, Saudi Arabia ranks even lower than Hamas' Gaza and Iran barely better. Those are the two countries you continually try and defend because it furthers your crusade against Israel.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,833
113
...

Even at worst the Afghanis just let AQ train on their land, funding the dry run of 9/11 is way more active a role.
So you think that going after the actual attackers is wrong and suggest going after the country where the attackers had fled prosecution from? Interesting.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,818
22,892
113
So you think that going after the actual attackers is wrong and suggest going after the country where the attackers had fled prosecution from? Interesting.
They didn't go after the actual attackers, they went after the country that they happened to be staying in instead.
Are you suggesting the Taliban knew what AQ's 9/11 plans were?

I suggest that going after the country that funded 9/11, where the attackers of 9/11 came from and were backed, would have been more effective then going after the country where they trained.
AQ just left Afghanistan and went to Pakistan and now Afghanistan is f*cked and Saudi Arabia is still funding terrorism.

Your plan sure didn't work out very well.

Meanwhile we keep finding tidbits like this:
According to the report, at least $15,000 went directly from Prince Bandar’s bank account in Washington to the family of a Saudi expatriate, suspected of being a Saudi government spy, who organized a support network in California for two of the 9/11 hijackers while they were living in San Diego in the year before the attacks.
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usne...government-funded-dry-run-of-plane-hijackings

That's the Saudi royal family funding 9/11 directly.
No wonder this case is likely going to court and 9/11 victim families suing Saudi Arabia.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,833
113
They didn't go after the actual attackers, they went after the country that they happened to be staying in instead....
They did both. And under the Taliban, Afghanistan's level of freedoms were even worse than Saudi Arabia.

I really can't believe that you are arguing they should have attacked Saudi Arabia. How would that benefit anyone?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,818
22,892
113
They did both. And under the Taliban, Afghanistan's level of freedoms were even worse than Saudi Arabia.

I really can't believe that you are arguing they should have attacked Saudi Arabia. How would that benefit anyone?
How did attacking Afghanistan benefit anyone?
I'm not saying they should have attacked Saudi Arabia, all the middle east 'interventions' have just made the world more fucked up and less safe.
But attacking Afghanistan when the evidence shows that the Saudi's were backing 9/11 was really stupid.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,833
113
How did attacking Afghanistan benefit anyone?....
It shut down Al Queda's main base of operation. It also got rid of the Taliban government which means that women now have some level of human rights. I'm sure that many in Afghanistan see the removal of the Taliban as a significant benefit.

And despite your attempt to blame everything on the US, the world was a fucked up and unsafe place already.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,818
22,892
113
It shut down Al Queda's main base of operation.
Failure
https://www.vox.com/world/2017/9/11/16288824/al-qaeda-isis-911

It also got rid of the Taliban government which means that women now have some level of human rights.
Total failure.
Afghanistan's human rights are no better, the present puppet government barely runs Kabul.

I'm sure that many in Afghanistan see the removal of the Taliban as a significant benefit.
The Afghan gov't calls US policy a failure and wants to go into peace talks with the Taliban.
16 years later.

By every metric you suggested, the attack on Afghanistan was misguided failure.

And still Saudi is funding terrorists.
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
It shut down Al Queda's main base of operation. It also got rid of the Taliban government which means that women now have some level of human rights. I'm sure that many in Afghanistan see the removal of the Taliban as a significant benefit.

And despite your attempt to blame everything on the US, the world was a fucked up and unsafe place already.
Of coarse that is all correct,... and accomplished without attacking Afghanistan.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
27,654
8,419
113
Room 112
Israel's human rights record is worse then either Saudi or Iran, based on their 70 year occupation and poor treatment of half of their population.
It's asinine comments like this that make it impossible to have a constructive debate with you.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Lets check your math.
The number of Jewish citizens is now equal or less then the number of Palestinian 'refugee's' and Arab 'citizens' living under Israeli rule.
http://forward.com/news/breaking-ne...-pass-jews-by-2017-in-israel-and-territories/

So when you weight that 80% with 20% (average of your two numbers) you end up with a freedom index of 50% for those living under Israeli rule.
Not so shining any more.

Not that Freedom Houses metrics are that unbiased in any event, but even by your best choice Israel is not looking great.

And again, neither Saudi Arabia or Iran currently runs an apartheid rule or runs anything like the Gaza strip, which Save the Children just declared 'unliveable'.
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2...onditions-gaza-unlivable-one-million-children
The State of Palestine is not part of Israel, it's occupied and by definition that means it's not Israel. You yourself called it occupied in your own post. Within the occupied territories the Palestinians have self rule and the basic freedom issues relate to that self rule: Hamas murdering political enemies, Fatah refusing to hold elections, etc.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,875
6,833
113
Ok, what has Iran or Saudi Arabia done that's a worse crime then apartheid?
We can start with their military intervention in Yemen. Then we can discuss how Saudi Arabia treats religious minorities and women, how the give extended prison terms to people who criticize their government, and enslaves migrant workers. Saudi Arabia actually has Muslims only roads and cities where only Muslims are allowed by law. You like Human Rights Watch so take a look. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2017/country-chapters/saudi-arabia

Even Hamas run Gaza ranks as more free than Saudi Arabia.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts