Your opinion is the law in most U.S. States.if she is to drunk to answer it is rape. just my opinion.
Your opinion is the law in most U.S. States.if she is to drunk to answer it is rape. just my opinion.
Who on earth said I believe it to be acceptable? What I do have a problem with is statements like "hard core rapist"i am really shaking my head at jtk and aardvark. you guys think this is ok?
Wow, I didn't know your words carried such weight down there, simon.Your opinion is the law in most U.S. States.
What the State presented was that she was extremely intoxicated (or in the vernacular she was trashed off her ass).I wonder if her drinks were spiked. She said she remembered nothing.
as it should be. just with man code there comes a time when a woman has been drinking that you should say "not gonna happen" as well.Your opinion is the law in most U.S. States.
Perhaps you could explain the difference between a softcore & hardcore rapist for us.Who on earth said I believe it to be acceptable? What I do have a problem with is statements like "hard core rapist"
should it have been worded the nice polite friendly rapist ? i could agree there needs to be no description in front of the word rapist. when you are called a rapist it should be implied that you are a piece of shit and be chemically castrated for the rest of your life.Who on earth said I believe it to be acceptable? What I do have a problem with is statements like "hard core rapist"
I'm for the belief that it doesn't matter if you killed 1 or 15, you're a murderer. Same is true for rapists.Who on earth said I believe it to be acceptable? What I do have a problem with is statements like "hard core rapist"
a gentle kiss and a punch in the face.Perhaps you could explain the difference between a softcore & hardcore rapist for us.
Exactly right. If she's unconscious or pretty close to it, then yeah, that would be crossing the line.as it should be. just with man code there comes a time when a woman has been drinking that you should say "not gonna happen" as well.
there comes a point in the evening even if she is not unconscious or close to it that you as a man should say this is not going to happen.Exactly right. If she's unconscious or pretty close to it, then yeah, that would be crossing the line.
Although your question is nonsensical - what the Hell is a softcore rapist. Basically: there was no previous history of either sexual harassment of, or sexual crimes against women. This particular crime although obviously involving lack of consent did not involve force or the threat thereof.Perhaps you could explain the difference between a softcore & hardcore rapist for us.
As the old saying goes never fuck a drunk, it seldom ends well.there comes a point in the evening even if she is not unconscious or close to it that you as a man should say this is not going to happen.
You said you had a problem with the words hardcore rapist. Well, what's the opposite of hardcore if not softcore?Although your question is nonsensical - what the Hell is a softcore rapist. Basically: there was no previous history of either sexual harassment of, or sexual crimes against women. This particular crime although obviously involving lack of consent did not involve force or the threat thereof.
I never said it was ok.i am really shaking my head at jtk and aardvark. you guys think this is ok?
In my mind, both cases are unacceptable. I can not debate the merits of the double standard if I do not agree there is one. Sorry. It just does not work that way. So yes, I kind of have to agree with it to debate that point. As it is now, there is a stand still.
I do not think she is at fault for being raped simply because she was drunk.
I do not think the teenage boy abused by a female teacher is lucky to have gotten the experience.
Both are 100% victims. Hopefully they will both be survivors. No double standard.
the one with the dick, that's whoOk what if one party gives consent while hammered and the other party acts on said consent when hammered.. who is to blame then when everyone is hammered?
That is not what you said at all.I also said that I think it should serve as a lesson to other 16 year old males that you can't do this kind of shit.
WTF are you going on about? She didn't turn into a nyphmo begging for it while being passed out and carried from one room to another. Sorry but you are not going to get me to say that the passed out drunk deserved what she got in anyway shape or form.Ok what if one party gives consent while hammered and the other party acts on said consent when hammered.. who is to blame then when everyone is hammered? It's not exactly earth shattering news that one's inhibitions decline when you are drunk. What is this girl turned into a total nympho when she got drunk, and then eventually passed out in the middle of an orgy... ?
Have a hard time reading?That is not what you said at all.
You said that a 16 SHOULD not attempt this type of "sex" because with pussy involved he is will be royally screwed. Not because it is wrong.
And I never said pussy was evil, you did not understand my point. My point is that the world is full of double standards and western society will come at a man full bore if there is even the slightest sexual impropriety agaisnt a female. Example: a male grabs a woman's ass on the subway - they will stop the subway, the police will be called, a manhunt will be carried out, the guy will be arrested, charged, put into the system, be registered as a sex offender, even go to jail.If I had a 16 year old son, I'd use this case as a very stern warning to him - "look son, whether you like it or not, our society is FULL of double standards and you mess with a girl, a drunk girl, or a stoned girl - and you think just because she didn't say no that you're ok to fuck around with her, look and see what can and will happen to you."