Another Cyclist Murdered

Moraff

Active member
Nov 14, 2003
3,648
0
36
Are we certain the cyclist was crossing and not riding on the shoulder and got hit from behind ?
According to the video clip in the link in post #5 the cyclist was going south, the first car east and second car west.
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,776
0
0
Link in post #5 has a video clip that shows up at the top of the article (took a few seconds to show up). @ 2:49 you have the driver of the second car indicating they had the green and the cyclist crossed on the red.
Thanks. Glad to see there are still guys on this Board who can post comments without going all berserk.
 

simon482

internets icon
Feb 8, 2009
9,966
175
63
i've heard this theory espoused by others. downtown cyclists are not drivers. some are kids. some are adult non-drivers. they have no experience with the "rules of the road". so they have no idea that the driver can't stop or even see them. it's just outside their life vision. it would take a smarter man than me to study this and come up with conclusions/suggestions. when i see them ride without looking what's comin', i do wonder tho.

this poor guy might have been cycling like this for years. stands to reason if he rode to school (work), he'd be riding a beater with nothing worth stealing. lights included. and altho i sidewalk ride too, i recognize it has it's dangerous moments. leaving this accident side, i amazed this doesn't happen several times a day. people are very lucky.
if they are on the road they are part of the highway traffic act regardless of location. i would like to see the law that says things don't apply according to age and location. if they don't know the rules of the road they shouldn't be on the road. ignorance of the law is no excuse.

licensing and training and insurance for cyclists should be mandatory, just like it is for cars.
 

groggy

Banned
Mar 21, 2011
15,262
0
0
The cyclist may have mistimed the lights.
Going south is going down a steep hill into the lights and into an advance green for the opposite direction (north). Perhaps he ran the red thinking the advance green was about to go or change, though he was fatally wrong in any event.

But why did the driver of the first van hit and then run away?
 

Mervyn

New member
Dec 23, 2005
3,549
0
0
If you enter an intersection againt a red light, that's against the law, period.

Why did the driver run away ? we don't know yet, probably panicked (no excuse) we'll find out soon enough I imagine.
 

Art Mann

sapiosexual
May 10, 2010
2,900
3
0
No excuse for the driver. No excuse for the cyclist.
Unless you're predisposed to take sides.
 

Adam_hadam

Well-known member
Feb 26, 2008
1,391
535
113
Probably some oblivious driver that didnt even realize what had happened. Unrealistic? Try riding a motorcycle in this city for a couple hours and you'll find out how clueless drivers in general are
Agreed but I would extend this to all Ontarians. Driving in America is stressless compared to the jerks, dolts a-holes, soccer moms on the phone while doing their mascara and yelling at the kids in the back seat to shut up because I'm on the phone that you find here.

The worst drivers in the gta are the greasy little effs who drive their souped-up civics and generally 3 series bmw owners.

The BEST drivers in the world are GO bus drivers, you never ever hear of them getting into accidents nors incidents.
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,776
0
0
No excuse for the driver. No excuse for the cyclist.
Unless you're predisposed to take sides.
I saw a video on CP 24 this morning of a taxi and a Honda colliding with each other at the exact same corner. Appears they were both going pretty fast. Wonder how fast the SUV was going when it hit the cyclist?
 

Mervyn

New member
Dec 23, 2005
3,549
0
0
I saw a video on CP 24 this morning of a taxi and a Honda colliding with each other at the exact same corner. Appears they were both going pretty fast. Wonder how fast the SUV was going when it hit the cyclist?
I would imagine since he hit two vehicles, it would be very difficult to determine that, unless the driver's vehicle has a device which recorded after the collision... I'll let a car guy state what that is I can't for the life of me recall what those are called, or if they came with that model of car.
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,776
0
0
I would imagine since he hit two vehicles, it would be very difficult to determine that,
The first van must have hit with a lot of force because it threw the victim (maybe 150 to 200 pounds?) into the oncoming lane to be struck by a vehicle coming from the opposite direction. CSI could probably reconstruct the accident.
 

gww

not banned
Mar 2, 2004
834
0
16
Somewhere but not here.
I saw a video on CP 24 this morning of a taxi and a Honda colliding with each other at the exact same corner. Appears they were both going pretty fast. Wonder how fast the SUV was going when it hit the cyclist?
Was there a cyclist involved in this morning's accident with the taxi and honda? Or your just trying to find some plausible way to automatically blame the driver on the other accident.
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,776
0
0
Was there a cyclist involved in this morning's accident with the taxi and honda? Or your just trying to find some plausible way to automatically blame the driver on the other accident.
It would appear that corner is accident prone. Wonder what is the pattern there? Some intersections might be poorly designed or simply bad karma or maybe attract the worst drivers.
 

larry

Active member
Oct 19, 2002
2,070
4
38
That "LIVE" accident looked to me like the cabbie was going thru the red. to me, the obvious cause is distraction. a pretty lady talking with a camera-man. one moment looking way at a critical time. doesn't take much to have an accident.
 

Mervyn

New member
Dec 23, 2005
3,549
0
0
The first van must have hit with a lot of force because it threw the victim (maybe 150 to 200 pounds?) into the oncoming lane to be struck by a vehicle coming from the opposite direction. CSI could probably reconstruct the accident.
Force is not just a product of velocity, but of Mass, something a minivan has plenty of.
 

Mister K

25 Years and GOING STRONG
Nov 21, 2006
699
1
0
Southern Ontario
Cyclists are not without fault...

I'm sorry but I am getting tired of the automatic assumption when there is an accident involving a cyclist that the driver of the vehicle is/was at fault.

For every 10 cyclists that I see when driving, usually HALF are not following the rules of the road or municipal bylaws (ie riding on the sidewalk). They travel on the wrong side of the road facing traffic, ignore traffic signs, red lights, one way streets, stop signs, ride through crosswalks, cross streets in the middle, the list goes on.

So rather than prejudging what happened, I wish that everyone would wait for the accident investigation before deciding that the big bad car/van/SUV driver was obviously at fault.

Oh, and Rockslinger, even if the vehicle driver was at fault, it would be characterized as "vehicular manslaughter" not murder.
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,776
0
0
even if the vehicle driver was at fault, it would be characterized at "vehicular manslaughter" not murder.
Thanks for the clarification. I didn't remember the actual legal term at the time I posted the thread so I used the catch-all murder word. I think "vehicular another legal term.
 

gww

not banned
Mar 2, 2004
834
0
16
Somewhere but not here.
I'm sorry but I am getting tired of the automatic assumption when there is an accident involving a cyclist that the driver of the vehicle is/was at fault.

For every 10 cyclists that I see when driving, usually HALF are not following the rules of the road or municipal bylaws (ie riding on the sidewalk). They travel on the wrong side of the road facing traffic, ignore traffic signs, red lights, one way streets, stop signs, ride through crosswalks, cross streets in the middle, the list goes on.

So rather than prejudging what happened, I wish that everyone would wait for the accident investigation before deciding that the big bad car/van/SUV driver was obviously at fault.

Oh, and Rockslinger, even if the vehicle driver was at fault, it would be characterized as "vehicular manslaughter" not murder.
+10.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,761
4,840
113
I'm sorry but I am getting tired of the automatic assumption when there is an accident involving a cyclist that the driver of the vehicle is/was at fault.

For every 10 cyclists that I see when driving, usually HALF are not following the rules of the road or municipal bylaws (ie riding on the sidewalk). They travel on the wrong side of the road facing traffic, ignore traffic signs, red lights, one way streets, stop signs, ride through crosswalks, cross streets in the middle, the list goes on
Quoted for truth
 
Toronto Escorts